One-year prognostic value of right ventricular to pulmonary arterial coupling among patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome: Insights from the ADDICT-ICCU study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.062
C. Nogarede , N. El Beze , G. Schurtz , J.C. Dib , C. Delmas , C. Bouleti , V. Roule , A. Boccara , A. Trimaille , F. Boccara , S. Toupin , J.-G. Dillinger , P. Henry , T. Pezel , C. Fauvel
{"title":"One-year prognostic value of right ventricular to pulmonary arterial coupling among patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome: Insights from the ADDICT-ICCU study","authors":"C. Nogarede ,&nbsp;N. El Beze ,&nbsp;G. Schurtz ,&nbsp;J.C. Dib ,&nbsp;C. Delmas ,&nbsp;C. Bouleti ,&nbsp;V. Roule ,&nbsp;A. Boccara ,&nbsp;A. Trimaille ,&nbsp;F. Boccara ,&nbsp;S. Toupin ,&nbsp;J.-G. Dillinger ,&nbsp;P. Henry ,&nbsp;T. Pezel ,&nbsp;C. Fauvel","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion over systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) assessed by echocardiography is a good non-invasive approach for right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling assessment. Although the prognostic value of this ratio is well known in many cardiovascular diseases, its prognostic value in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not established.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess one-year prognostic value of TAPSE/sPAP among patients hospitalised for ACS.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In the prospective multicentric ADDICT-ICCU study, all consecutive patients hospitalized for ACS over two weeks in April 2021 at 39 centres across France were included. The TAPSE/sPAP ratio was measured using the first echocardiography performed within the first 24 hours of hospitalisation. The primary composite outcome was one-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including: all-cause death or urgent hospitalisation for acute cardiovascular reason (acute heart failure, urgent myocardial revascularisation). C-tree analysis was used to find the optimal TAPSE/sPAP cut-off to predict the primary outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 772 ACS patients (age 64<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12 years, 74% males) included, 113 (15%) experienced 1-year MACE. The best cut-off for TAPSE/sPAP to predict 1-year MACE was 0.67 mm/mmHg. Patients with TAPSE/Spap<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.67 mm/mmHg were more likely older (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), with previous atrial fibrillation (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), a higher length of hospitalization in ICCU (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), a higher NTproBNP (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and a worse LVEF value (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). At one-year, all-cause death occurred in 27 (24%) patients with TAPSE/sPAP<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.67, compared to 7 (6%) with TAPSE/Spap<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.67 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), and 32 (28%) patients with TAPSE/sPAP<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.67 were hospitalised for acute cardiovascular reason against 20 (18%) with TAPSE/sPAP<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.67 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006). After adjustment for all traditional prognosticators, grouped in models, TAPSE/sPAP<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.67 mm/mmHg remained independently associated with the primary outcome: model 1 (comorbidities): HR 2.82, 95% CI [2.92–4.38], <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001, model 2 (echocardiography): HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.38, 95% CI [1,40–4,03], <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). <span><span>Fig. 1</span></span> shows that patients with TAPSE/sPAP ≤0.67 mm/mmHg had worse event-free survival for the primary outcome: HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.92, 95% CI [1.98–4.29], <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TAPSE/sPAP was independently associated with 1-year MACE in patients hospitalised for ACS, even after adjustment with traditional prognosticators, including LVEF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 1","pages":"Pages S8-S9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213624004078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion over systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) assessed by echocardiography is a good non-invasive approach for right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling assessment. Although the prognostic value of this ratio is well known in many cardiovascular diseases, its prognostic value in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not established.

Objective

To assess one-year prognostic value of TAPSE/sPAP among patients hospitalised for ACS.

Method

In the prospective multicentric ADDICT-ICCU study, all consecutive patients hospitalized for ACS over two weeks in April 2021 at 39 centres across France were included. The TAPSE/sPAP ratio was measured using the first echocardiography performed within the first 24 hours of hospitalisation. The primary composite outcome was one-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including: all-cause death or urgent hospitalisation for acute cardiovascular reason (acute heart failure, urgent myocardial revascularisation). C-tree analysis was used to find the optimal TAPSE/sPAP cut-off to predict the primary outcome.

Results

Among the 772 ACS patients (age 64 ± 12 years, 74% males) included, 113 (15%) experienced 1-year MACE. The best cut-off for TAPSE/sPAP to predict 1-year MACE was 0.67 mm/mmHg. Patients with TAPSE/Spap  0.67 mm/mmHg were more likely older (p < 0.001), with previous atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), a higher length of hospitalization in ICCU (p < 0.001), a higher NTproBNP (p = 0.001) and a worse LVEF value (p < 0.001). At one-year, all-cause death occurred in 27 (24%) patients with TAPSE/sPAP  0.67, compared to 7 (6%) with TAPSE/Spap > 0.67 (p < 0.001), and 32 (28%) patients with TAPSE/sPAP  0.67 were hospitalised for acute cardiovascular reason against 20 (18%) with TAPSE/sPAP > 0.67 (p = 0.006). After adjustment for all traditional prognosticators, grouped in models, TAPSE/sPAP < 0.67 mm/mmHg remained independently associated with the primary outcome: model 1 (comorbidities): HR 2.82, 95% CI [2.92–4.38], p < 0.001, model 2 (echocardiography): HR = 2.38, 95% CI [1,40–4,03], p < 0.001). Fig. 1 shows that patients with TAPSE/sPAP ≤0.67 mm/mmHg had worse event-free survival for the primary outcome: HR = 2.92, 95% CI [1.98–4.29], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

TAPSE/sPAP was independently associated with 1-year MACE in patients hospitalised for ACS, even after adjustment with traditional prognosticators, including LVEF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者右心室-肺动脉耦合的一年预后价值:来自addiction - iccu研究的见解
超声心动图评估三尖瓣环形平面收缩漂移超过收缩期肺动脉压(TAPSE/sPAP)是评估右心室-肺动脉(RV-PA)耦合的一种良好的无创方法。虽然这一比值在许多心血管疾病中的预后价值是众所周知的,但其在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)中的预后价值尚不确定。目的评价TAPSE/sPAP对ACS住院患者1年预后的价值。方法在这项前瞻性多中心addiction - iccu研究中,纳入了2021年4月在法国39个中心因ACS连续住院两周以上的所有患者。TAPSE/sPAP比值是在住院后24小时内进行的第一次超声心动图测量的。主要综合结局为一年主要心血管不良事件(MACE),包括:全因死亡或因急性心血管原因(急性心力衰竭、紧急心肌血运重建)而紧急住院。C-tree分析用于寻找预测主要预后的最佳TAPSE/sPAP截止值。结果772例ACS患者(年龄64±12岁,男性74%)中,113例(15%)经历了1年的MACE。TAPSE/sPAP预测1年MACE的最佳截止值为0.67 mm/mmHg。TAPSE/Spap≤0.67 mm/mmHg的患者更有可能是老年人(p <;0.001),既往有房颤(p <;0.001),重症监护病房的住院时间较长(p <;0.001), NTproBNP较高(p = 0.001), LVEF值较差(p <;0.001)。一年后,TAPSE/sPAP≤0.67的患者中有27例(24%)发生全因死亡,而TAPSE/sPAP≤0.67的患者中有7例(6%)发生全因死亡;0.67 (p <;0.001), 32例(28%)TAPSE/sPAP≤0.67患者因急性心血管原因住院,而20例(18%)TAPSE/sPAP≤0.67患者因急性心血管原因住院;0.67 (p = 0.006)。对所有传统预测因子进行调整后,按模型分组,TAPSE/sPAP <;0.67 mm/mmHg仍然与主要结局独立相关:模型1(合并症):HR 2.82, 95% CI [2.92-4.38], p <;0.001,模型2(超声心动图):HR = 2.38, 95% CI [1,40 - 4,03], p <;0.001)。图1显示,TAPSE/sPAP≤0.67 mm/mmHg的患者的主要结局无事件生存率较差:HR = 2.92, 95% CI [1.98-4.29], p <;0.001)。结论:即使在调整了包括LVEF在内的传统预后指标后,tapse /sPAP与ACS住院患者的1年MACE独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial board Transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects in 2253 children and adults: Early outcomes Clinical impact of congestion in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock Combination of a proximity catheterization laboratory and high-volume operators is associated with improved outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1