Predicting predator abundance from prey in estuaries: Insights from single and joint species distribution modeling

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2024.109083
Sally Dowd , Sarah M. Roberts , Nathan M. Bacheler , Janet A. Nye
{"title":"Predicting predator abundance from prey in estuaries: Insights from single and joint species distribution modeling","authors":"Sally Dowd ,&nbsp;Sarah M. Roberts ,&nbsp;Nathan M. Bacheler ,&nbsp;Janet A. Nye","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2024.109083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Species occurrence and abundance is determined by both abiotic and biotic factors. Yet, species distribution models (SDMs) that rely on species-environment responses to form inferences about and predictions for species of interest, often ignore the effect of prey on predator distribution. There has been recent effort to consider these effects and advance SDMs particularly through the use of spatiotemporal models. However, these models have not been tested extensively in estuarine systems. We used fisheries-independent data to understand if prey abundance helps explain red drum, southern kingfish and black drum abundance in addition to the environment in a North Carolina estuarine system. We modeled these predators of blue crabs due to the decline in blue crab populations in North Carolina, once constituting the most lucrative fishery in the state. The distribution of all three predators was best explained by abiotic variables alongside either blue crab or total prey abundance. We tested the ability of two modeling approaches, single SDMs and joint SDMs, to make inferences and predictions of predator distribution. By comparing modeling types with different combinations of abiotic variables, total prey abundance, and blue crab abundance, we found consistency in the best fit model across modeling approaches for two of the three predators. Single SDMs often outperformed joint SDMs when predicting abundance. As our joint SDM approach leveraged conditional prediction, we asked if an increase in spatial resolution and prey information improved predictive performance. Although there was a slight improvement as more observations were included, joint models still provided weak predictions. With the advance of novel modeling techniques, we must consider tradeoffs between model choice, covariate selection, spatial scale, and data types.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50497,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","volume":"313 ","pages":"Article 109083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771424004712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species occurrence and abundance is determined by both abiotic and biotic factors. Yet, species distribution models (SDMs) that rely on species-environment responses to form inferences about and predictions for species of interest, often ignore the effect of prey on predator distribution. There has been recent effort to consider these effects and advance SDMs particularly through the use of spatiotemporal models. However, these models have not been tested extensively in estuarine systems. We used fisheries-independent data to understand if prey abundance helps explain red drum, southern kingfish and black drum abundance in addition to the environment in a North Carolina estuarine system. We modeled these predators of blue crabs due to the decline in blue crab populations in North Carolina, once constituting the most lucrative fishery in the state. The distribution of all three predators was best explained by abiotic variables alongside either blue crab or total prey abundance. We tested the ability of two modeling approaches, single SDMs and joint SDMs, to make inferences and predictions of predator distribution. By comparing modeling types with different combinations of abiotic variables, total prey abundance, and blue crab abundance, we found consistency in the best fit model across modeling approaches for two of the three predators. Single SDMs often outperformed joint SDMs when predicting abundance. As our joint SDM approach leveraged conditional prediction, we asked if an increase in spatial resolution and prey information improved predictive performance. Although there was a slight improvement as more observations were included, joint models still provided weak predictions. With the advance of novel modeling techniques, we must consider tradeoffs between model choice, covariate selection, spatial scale, and data types.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从河口的猎物中预测捕食者的丰度:来自单一和联合物种分布模型的见解
物种的发生和丰度是由生物和非生物因素共同决定的。然而,依靠物种-环境反应来推断和预测目标物种的物种分布模型(SDMs)往往忽略了猎物对捕食者分布的影响。最近有一些研究努力考虑这些影响,特别是通过使用时空模型来推进sdm。然而,这些模型尚未在河口系统中进行广泛的测试。我们使用独立于渔业的数据来了解猎物丰度是否有助于解释北卡罗莱纳河口系统中的红鼓鱼、南王鱼和黑鼓鱼的丰度。由于北卡罗来纳州蓝蟹数量的减少,我们模拟了这些蓝蟹的捕食者,蓝蟹曾经是该州最赚钱的渔业。这三种捕食者的分布最好由非生物变量以及蓝蟹或总猎物丰度来解释。我们测试了单sdm和联合sdm两种建模方法对捕食者分布进行推断和预测的能力。通过比较非生物变量、总猎物丰度和蓝蟹丰度不同组合的建模类型,我们发现三种捕食者中两种建模方法的最佳拟合模型具有一致性。在预测丰度时,单个sdm通常优于联合sdm。由于我们的联合SDM方法利用了条件预测,我们想知道空间分辨率和猎物信息的增加是否会提高预测性能。虽然由于纳入了更多的观测结果,结果略有改善,但联合模型仍然提供了较弱的预测。随着新型建模技术的发展,我们必须考虑模型选择、协变量选择、空间尺度和数据类型之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science is an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. The journal provides a unique forum, unifying the multidisciplinary approaches to the study of the oceanography of estuaries, coastal zones, and continental shelf seas. It features original research papers, review papers and short communications treating such disciplines as zoology, botany, geology, sedimentology, physical oceanography.
期刊最新文献
The deterministic role of surface elevation in natural mangrove establishment and expansion: insight from Unmanned Aerial Systems A window into the ghost shark's life: eye lenses reveal a biphasic trophic strategy driven by neonatal generalism The relative contributions of baseline hydroperiod, event-driven exceedances, and tropical-cyclone extremes to marsh accretion in microtidal regimes Benthic assemblage structure under contrasting current regimes and depth strata in Nuevo Gulf, Patagonia, Argentina Human impacts suppress marine organic matter input in Dongzhai harbor mangrove sediments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1