Propensity score-matched analysis in isolated left ventricular dilation in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.096
T. Gonçalves , T. Pezel , P. Garot , S. Toupin , S. Duhamel , F. Sanguineti , T. Unterseeh , T. Hovasse , E. Gall , L. Hamzi , A. Unger , J.-G. Dillinger , P. Henry , V. Bousson , J. Garot
{"title":"Propensity score-matched analysis in isolated left ventricular dilation in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy","authors":"T. Gonçalves ,&nbsp;T. Pezel ,&nbsp;P. Garot ,&nbsp;S. Toupin ,&nbsp;S. Duhamel ,&nbsp;F. Sanguineti ,&nbsp;T. Unterseeh ,&nbsp;T. Hovasse ,&nbsp;E. Gall ,&nbsp;L. Hamzi ,&nbsp;A. Unger ,&nbsp;J.-G. Dillinger ,&nbsp;P. Henry ,&nbsp;V. Bousson ,&nbsp;J. Garot","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The presence and extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are strong prognosticators of death in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), defined as left ventricular (LV) dilation and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->50%. Although the current guidelines defined the concept of “isolated LV dilation” (ILVD) as LV dilation with preserved LVEF<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->50%, the prognostic value of the “LGE granularity” is not established in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the prognostic value of the concept of “LGE granularity” including its extent, location, and pattern for predicting all-cause death above traditional prognosticators in patients with DCM or ILVD, separately.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Between 2008 and 2021, all consecutive patients with DCM and ILVD without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or history of sustained ventricular arrhythmia referred for CMR were included in two centres. The primary outcome was all-cause death using the French National Registry of Death. A propensity score matching was performed to balance characteristics in patients with DCM vs. those with ILVD. Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of each LGE findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2752 patients analysed (age 52<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8 years, 56% male), 15% patients died after a median (inter-quartile range) follow-up of 9 (7–12) years. A total of 737 (27%) patients had LGE. In the propensity-score matched population (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1084 in DCM subgroup and <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1084 in isolated LV dilation), the LGE presence was associated with death (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.98, 95%CI: 1.97–4.50, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). In ILVD patients with LGE (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->265), the LGE extent (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.41, 95%CI: 1.09–1.83, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009), the presence of LGE in multiple areas (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.86, 95%CI: 1.73–8.61, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and the septal location (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.97, 95%CI: 1.37–6.46, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006) were strong prognosticators of death after adjustment for traditional prognosticators (<span><span>Figure 1</span></span>). Similarly, in DCM patients with LGE (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->268), the LGE extent (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.42, 95%CI: 1.07–1.89, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014), the LGE presence in multiple areas (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8.41, 95%CI: 3.32–21.3, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and the septal location (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6.65, 95%CI: 3.02–14.6, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) were strongly associated with death.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The concept of “LGE granularity” was independently associated with all-cause death after adjustment for all traditional prognosticators in both DCM and ILVD. These results suggest that CMR assessment could improve the risk stratification in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 1","pages":"Page S53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213624004418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The presence and extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are strong prognosticators of death in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), defined as left ventricular (LV) dilation and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%. Although the current guidelines defined the concept of “isolated LV dilation” (ILVD) as LV dilation with preserved LVEF  50%, the prognostic value of the “LGE granularity” is not established in this population.

Objective

To assess the prognostic value of the concept of “LGE granularity” including its extent, location, and pattern for predicting all-cause death above traditional prognosticators in patients with DCM or ILVD, separately.

Method

Between 2008 and 2021, all consecutive patients with DCM and ILVD without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or history of sustained ventricular arrhythmia referred for CMR were included in two centres. The primary outcome was all-cause death using the French National Registry of Death. A propensity score matching was performed to balance characteristics in patients with DCM vs. those with ILVD. Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of each LGE findings.

Results

Of 2752 patients analysed (age 52 ± 8 years, 56% male), 15% patients died after a median (inter-quartile range) follow-up of 9 (7–12) years. A total of 737 (27%) patients had LGE. In the propensity-score matched population (n = 1084 in DCM subgroup and n = 1084 in isolated LV dilation), the LGE presence was associated with death (HR = 2.98, 95%CI: 1.97–4.50, p < 0.001). In ILVD patients with LGE (n = 265), the LGE extent (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.09–1.83, p = 0.009), the presence of LGE in multiple areas (HR = 3.86, 95%CI: 1.73–8.61, p < 0.001) and the septal location (HR = 2.97, 95%CI: 1.37–6.46, p = 0.006) were strong prognosticators of death after adjustment for traditional prognosticators (Figure 1). Similarly, in DCM patients with LGE (n = 268), the LGE extent (HR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.07–1.89, p = 0.014), the LGE presence in multiple areas (HR = 8.41, 95%CI: 3.32–21.3, p < 0.001) and the septal location (HR = 6.65, 95%CI: 3.02–14.6, p < 0.001) were strongly associated with death.

Conclusion

The concept of “LGE granularity” was independently associated with all-cause death after adjustment for all traditional prognosticators in both DCM and ILVD. These results suggest that CMR assessment could improve the risk stratification in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非缺血性扩张型心肌病孤立性左室扩张的倾向评分匹配分析
心脏磁共振成像(CMR)评估晚期钆增强(LGE)的存在和程度是非缺血性扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者死亡的有力预测指标,DCM定义为左心室(LV)扩张和左心室射血分数(LVEF) <;50%。尽管目前的指南将“孤立性左室扩张”(ILVD)定义为LVEF≥50%的左室扩张,但“LGE粒度”在这一人群中的预后价值尚未确定。目的评估“LGE粒度”概念的预后价值,包括其范围、位置和模式,分别预测DCM或ILVD患者的全因死亡。方法2008年至2021年期间,两个中心的所有连续DCM和ILVD患者均未植入心律转复除颤器或有持续性室性心律失常病史。根据法国国家死亡登记处的数据,主要结局是全因死亡。采用倾向评分匹配来平衡DCM患者与ILVD患者的特征。采用Cox回归来确定每项LGE结果的预后价值。结果2752例患者(年龄52±8岁,56%为男性)中,15%的患者在9(7-12)年的中位(四分位间距)随访后死亡。共有737例(27%)患者发生LGE。在倾向评分匹配的人群中(DCM亚组n = 1084,孤立左室扩张组n = 1084), LGE的存在与死亡相关(HR = 2.98, 95%CI: 1.97-4.50, p <;0.001)。在合并LGE的ILVD患者中(n = 265), LGE程度(HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.09-1.83, p = 0.009), LGE多部位存在(HR = 3.86, 95%CI: 1.73-8.61, p <;0.001)和鼻中隔位置(HR = 2.97, 95%CI: 1.37-6.46, p = 0.006)是校正传统预后因子后死亡的重要预测因子(图1)。同样,在合并LGE的DCM患者(n = 268)中,LGE程度(HR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.07-1.89, p = 0.014)、LGE存在于多个区域(HR = 8.41, 95%CI: 3.32-21.3, p <;0.001)和间隔位置(HR = 6.65, 95%CI: 3.02-14.6, p <;0.001)与死亡密切相关。结论调整DCM和ILVD的所有传统预后指标后,“LGE粒度”概念与全因死亡独立相关。这些结果表明,CMR评估可以改善该人群的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Vaccination is as efficient as a cardiovascular drug! An editorial discussion of vaccination as “the new pillar in cardiovascular prevention” Geographic and demographic disparities in left–ventricular failure mortality, 1999–2020, with forecasts to 2040: A nationwide US analysis Letter in response to the article entitled “Psychoactive drug use and prognosis in patients with cancer presenting with acute cardiovascular disease” by Jaëck et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1