Field-based hyperspectral imaging for detection and spatial mapping of fusarium head blight in wheat

IF 5.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY European Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127485
Muhammad Baraa Almoujahed , Orly Enrique Apolo-Apolo , Rebecca L. Whetton , Marius Kazlauskas , Zita Kriaučiūnienė , Egidijus Šarauskis , Abdul Mounem Mouazen
{"title":"Field-based hyperspectral imaging for detection and spatial mapping of fusarium head blight in wheat","authors":"Muhammad Baraa Almoujahed ,&nbsp;Orly Enrique Apolo-Apolo ,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Whetton ,&nbsp;Marius Kazlauskas ,&nbsp;Zita Kriaučiūnienė ,&nbsp;Egidijus Šarauskis ,&nbsp;Abdul Mounem Mouazen","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fusarium head blight (FHB) poses a substantial threat to cereal crop production, significantly affecting both grain yield and quality by producing harmful mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON), which is detrimental to human and animal health. To manage this threat effectively, precise detection and mapping of FHB spatial distribution at the field level are crucial. This study aimed to detect and map FHB in four commercial winter wheat fields in Belgium and Lithuania using a push-broom hyperspectral camera (400–1000 nm), mounted on a tractor. The on-line collected hyperspectral data were first subjected to a linear regression model to segment wheat ears from the background using a linear regression model, achieving a precision of 0.99. The segmented hyperspectral data were then correlated with FHB severity, assessed by means of groundtruth captured RGB images using two dataset. The first dataset (M1) combined data from both countries, whereas the second dataset (M2) used data from the three fields in Lithuania only. The two datasets were then subjected to four machine learning (ML) modelling techniques, namely, extra trees regression (ETR), random forest regression (RFR), support vector regression (SVR), and one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN). Once validated using an independent validation set, these models were used to predict and map FHB using the on-line collected spectra in the four fields. Additionally, recursive feature elimination (RFE) and mutual information (MI) approaches to select the optimal wavebands for FHB detection were employed. Results demonstrated the capability of ETR to predict FHB severity successfully, surpassing the other ML models, achieving coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) values of 0.68 and 0.79 for M1 and M2, respectively. The residual prediction deviation (RPD) values recorded were 1.77 for M1 and 2.18 for M2, and the ration of performance to inter-quartile range (RPIQ) values were 2.89 and 3.51, respectively. Moreover, M2 showed enhanced model accuracy for the used ML models, except for SVM. The application of MI on ETR significantly improved the predictive accuracy, with R² values of 0.75 for M1 and 0.82 for M2, In contrast, the application of RFE did not result in any improvement in the models effectiveness, as evidenced by R² values of 0.65 and 0.75 for M1 and M2, respectively. A comparison between the predicted points from the on-line scanning and ground truth maps shows varying levels of spatial similarity with a kappa value reaching 0.58. These results confirm the potential of integrating hyperspectral imaging with ML models for effective detection and spatial mapping of FHB in wheat fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 127485"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124004064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) poses a substantial threat to cereal crop production, significantly affecting both grain yield and quality by producing harmful mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON), which is detrimental to human and animal health. To manage this threat effectively, precise detection and mapping of FHB spatial distribution at the field level are crucial. This study aimed to detect and map FHB in four commercial winter wheat fields in Belgium and Lithuania using a push-broom hyperspectral camera (400–1000 nm), mounted on a tractor. The on-line collected hyperspectral data were first subjected to a linear regression model to segment wheat ears from the background using a linear regression model, achieving a precision of 0.99. The segmented hyperspectral data were then correlated with FHB severity, assessed by means of groundtruth captured RGB images using two dataset. The first dataset (M1) combined data from both countries, whereas the second dataset (M2) used data from the three fields in Lithuania only. The two datasets were then subjected to four machine learning (ML) modelling techniques, namely, extra trees regression (ETR), random forest regression (RFR), support vector regression (SVR), and one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN). Once validated using an independent validation set, these models were used to predict and map FHB using the on-line collected spectra in the four fields. Additionally, recursive feature elimination (RFE) and mutual information (MI) approaches to select the optimal wavebands for FHB detection were employed. Results demonstrated the capability of ETR to predict FHB severity successfully, surpassing the other ML models, achieving coefficients of determination (R2) values of 0.68 and 0.79 for M1 and M2, respectively. The residual prediction deviation (RPD) values recorded were 1.77 for M1 and 2.18 for M2, and the ration of performance to inter-quartile range (RPIQ) values were 2.89 and 3.51, respectively. Moreover, M2 showed enhanced model accuracy for the used ML models, except for SVM. The application of MI on ETR significantly improved the predictive accuracy, with R² values of 0.75 for M1 and 0.82 for M2, In contrast, the application of RFE did not result in any improvement in the models effectiveness, as evidenced by R² values of 0.65 and 0.75 for M1 and M2, respectively. A comparison between the predicted points from the on-line scanning and ground truth maps shows varying levels of spatial similarity with a kappa value reaching 0.58. These results confirm the potential of integrating hyperspectral imaging with ML models for effective detection and spatial mapping of FHB in wheat fields.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小麦赤霉病田间高光谱成像检测与空间制图
镰刀菌头疫病(FHB)对谷物作物生产构成重大威胁,通过产生有害真菌毒素,如脱氧雪腐镰刀菌醇(DON),严重影响粮食产量和质量,对人类和动物健康有害。为了有效地管理这一威胁,在实地一级精确检测和绘制食品毒素的空间分布是至关重要的。本研究旨在使用安装在拖拉机上的推扫帚高光谱相机(400-1000 nm)在比利时和立陶宛的四个商业冬小麦地里检测和绘制FHB。首先对在线采集的高光谱数据进行线性回归模型,利用线性回归模型从背景中分割麦穗,精度达到0.99。然后将分割的高光谱数据与FHB严重程度相关联,通过使用两个数据集捕获的RGB图像来评估。第一个数据集(M1)结合了来自这两个国家的数据,而第二个数据集(M2)仅使用了来自立陶宛三个领域的数据。然后对这两个数据集进行了四种机器学习(ML)建模技术,即额外树回归(ETR)、随机森林回归(RFR)、支持向量回归(SVR)和一维卷积神经网络(1DCNN)。一旦使用独立的验证集进行验证,这些模型就可以使用在线收集的四个领域的光谱来预测和绘制FHB。此外,采用递归特征消除(RFE)和互信息(MI)方法选择FHB检测的最佳波段。结果表明,ETR能够成功预测FHB严重程度,优于其他ML模型,M1和M2的决定系数(R2)分别为0.68和0.79。M1的残差预测偏差(RPD)值为1.77,M2的残差预测偏差(RPD)值为2.18,性能与四分位数间差(RPIQ)值之比分别为2.89和3.51。此外,除了SVM之外,M2对所使用的ML模型的模型精度都有提高。MI对ETR的预测精度显著提高,M1的R²值为0.75,M2的R²值为0.82,而RFE的应用对模型的有效性没有任何改善,M1和M2的R²值分别为0.65和0.75。在线扫描预测点与地面真值图的空间相似度不同,kappa值达到0.58。这些结果证实了将高光谱成像与ML模型相结合的潜力,可以有效地检测和绘制麦田中FHB的空间图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
期刊最新文献
Late-season N diagnosis governs the performance of sensor and LCC-based N management strategies in Bt cotton How do nutrient supply and reduced tillage influence weed flora and its impact on grain maize growth under organic farming? Long-term effect of cover crops on soil C and N dynamics in no-till crop rotations of the Argentinean Rolling Pampas: Coupling observations and STICS simulations Managing species dominance in cereal-legume intercrop systems Sustainable grazing strategies for balancing soil conservation and grassland utilization under climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1