Crystallization-coalescence relationships in laser powder bed fusion: Moving beyond the “sintering window”

IF 11.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Additive manufacturing Pub Date : 2025-02-25 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2025.104668
Camden A. Chatham
{"title":"Crystallization-coalescence relationships in laser powder bed fusion: Moving beyond the “sintering window”","authors":"Camden A. Chatham","doi":"10.1016/j.addma.2025.104668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Laser-based polymer powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/P) additive manufacturing (AM) creates objects through layerwise repetition of selective consolidation of polymer powder particles. The specific molecular- and meso-scale mechanisms responsible for consolidation are important to understand to rapidly identify potential new materials for PBF-LB and correctly attribute observed failures, defects, and deviancy to either feedstock issues or process issues for quality assurance. Such understanding must draw from both material science principles and a deep comprehension of how automated hardware interacts with the feedstock during the manufacturing process. The so-called “Sintering Window” or “PBF Processing Window” is a prevalent tool claimed by many to adequately and rapidly summarize these key relationships between feedstock properties and the manufacturing process. This tool has been common parlance in PBF-LB/P research since the early days of commercialized PBF-LB/P (a.k.a., Selective Laser Sintering, SLS) in the mid 1990’s. The author argues in the present work that lack of progression beyond the rudimentary Sintering Window is hampering advancement of this AM modality as it elevates secondary factors (e.g., crystallization) above primary factors (e.g., coalescence) and does so in a manner disconnected from the real manufacturing environment. The present work outlines four issues with the overuse of the Sintering Window in fundamental research and provides alternative methodologies for reconciling the present body of fundamental polymer science with the present understanding of PBF-LB process physics. Namely, an increased emphasis on coalescing flow behavior that is ultimately arrested by crystallization at the point of physical gelation is recommended for investigating potential suitability of the typical semicrystalline polymer for PBF-LB. Six varieties of nylon-12 and one commercially available polypropylene material are used as exemplars.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7172,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 104668"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860425000326","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser-based polymer powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/P) additive manufacturing (AM) creates objects through layerwise repetition of selective consolidation of polymer powder particles. The specific molecular- and meso-scale mechanisms responsible for consolidation are important to understand to rapidly identify potential new materials for PBF-LB and correctly attribute observed failures, defects, and deviancy to either feedstock issues or process issues for quality assurance. Such understanding must draw from both material science principles and a deep comprehension of how automated hardware interacts with the feedstock during the manufacturing process. The so-called “Sintering Window” or “PBF Processing Window” is a prevalent tool claimed by many to adequately and rapidly summarize these key relationships between feedstock properties and the manufacturing process. This tool has been common parlance in PBF-LB/P research since the early days of commercialized PBF-LB/P (a.k.a., Selective Laser Sintering, SLS) in the mid 1990’s. The author argues in the present work that lack of progression beyond the rudimentary Sintering Window is hampering advancement of this AM modality as it elevates secondary factors (e.g., crystallization) above primary factors (e.g., coalescence) and does so in a manner disconnected from the real manufacturing environment. The present work outlines four issues with the overuse of the Sintering Window in fundamental research and provides alternative methodologies for reconciling the present body of fundamental polymer science with the present understanding of PBF-LB process physics. Namely, an increased emphasis on coalescing flow behavior that is ultimately arrested by crystallization at the point of physical gelation is recommended for investigating potential suitability of the typical semicrystalline polymer for PBF-LB. Six varieties of nylon-12 and one commercially available polypropylene material are used as exemplars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光粉末床熔合中的结晶-聚结关系:超越“烧结窗口”
基于激光的聚合物粉末床熔融(PBF-LB/P)增材制造(AM)通过分层重复选择性固结聚合物粉末颗粒来制造物体。为了快速识别PBF-LB的潜在新材料,并正确地将观察到的故障、缺陷和偏差归因于原料问题或工艺问题,以保证质量,了解负责固结的特定分子和中观尺度机制非常重要。这种理解必须从材料科学原理和对自动化硬件在制造过程中如何与原料相互作用的深刻理解中得出。所谓的“烧结窗口”或“PBF加工窗口”是许多人声称的一种流行的工具,可以充分和快速地总结原料属性和制造过程之间的这些关键关系。自20世纪90年代中期商业化PBF-LB/P(又名选择性激光烧结,SLS)的早期以来,这种工具一直是PBF-LB/P研究的常用说法。作者在目前的工作中认为,缺乏超出基本烧结窗口的进展阻碍了这种增材制造模式的发展,因为它将次要因素(例如结晶)提升到主要因素(例如聚结)之上,并且以与实际制造环境脱节的方式进行。目前的工作概述了在基础研究中过度使用烧结窗口的四个问题,并提供了调和现有基础聚合物科学与目前对PBF-LB过程物理的理解的替代方法。也就是说,为了研究典型的半结晶聚合物对PBF-LB的潜在适用性,建议增加对聚结流动行为的重视,这种行为最终在物理凝胶化时被结晶所阻止。以六种尼龙-12和一种市售聚丙烯材料为例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing
Additive manufacturing Materials Science-General Materials Science
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
12.70%
发文量
648
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Additive Manufacturing stands as a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to delivering high-quality research papers and reviews in the field of additive manufacturing, serving both academia and industry leaders. The journal's objective is to recognize the innovative essence of additive manufacturing and its diverse applications, providing a comprehensive overview of current developments and future prospects. The transformative potential of additive manufacturing technologies in product design and manufacturing is poised to disrupt traditional approaches. In response to this paradigm shift, a distinctive and comprehensive publication outlet was essential. Additive Manufacturing fulfills this need, offering a platform for engineers, materials scientists, and practitioners across academia and various industries to document and share innovations in these evolving technologies.
期刊最新文献
Tailoring the microstructure of a eutectic NiAl-(Cr,Mo) alloy processed by electron beam powder bed fusion The DED-Arc number: A dimensionless correlation of wire arc additive manufacturing parameters to bead shape Neural field-based shape optimization for manufacturability-aware support structure minimisation Achieving architectured microstructures in plain carbon steel through programmed phase transformation using additive manufacturing Topology optimization of non-uniform conformal lattice structures with feature size in additive manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1