Volatility spillovers and conditional correlations between oil, renewables and stock markets: A multivariate GARCH-in-mean analysis

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101639
Wenxue Wang , Peter G. Moffatt , Zheng Zhang , Muhammad Yousaf Raza
{"title":"Volatility spillovers and conditional correlations between oil, renewables and stock markets: A multivariate GARCH-in-mean analysis","authors":"Wenxue Wang ,&nbsp;Peter G. Moffatt ,&nbsp;Zheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Muhammad Yousaf Raza","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate linkages between three different markets: renewable energy (represented by a range of renewable energy ETFs); traditional energy (represented by crude oil ETF); and common stocks (represented by the S&amp;P 500 Index ETF). We use daily data from 2008 to 2021. The econometric framework adopted is the VARMA-DCC-GARCH-in-mean model. We find that this framework is ideal because it allows us to identify the impact of uncertainty in one market on returns in another market, and also volatility spillovers, that is, the phenomenon of high uncertainty in one market spreading to other markets. Our key findings are as follows. Stock-market uncertainty influences traditional energy (negatively) and renewable energy (positively) at the mean level. Stock market volatility has a positive spillover effect on both conventional and renewable energies in the short-run, but these spillover effects are negative in the long-run. Our estimates of the time-paths of dynamic conditional correlations provide evidence that the renewable market is more heavily “financialized” than the traditional energy market, and moreover that the strong financialization of renewables is robust to financial crises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101639"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate linkages between three different markets: renewable energy (represented by a range of renewable energy ETFs); traditional energy (represented by crude oil ETF); and common stocks (represented by the S&P 500 Index ETF). We use daily data from 2008 to 2021. The econometric framework adopted is the VARMA-DCC-GARCH-in-mean model. We find that this framework is ideal because it allows us to identify the impact of uncertainty in one market on returns in another market, and also volatility spillovers, that is, the phenomenon of high uncertainty in one market spreading to other markets. Our key findings are as follows. Stock-market uncertainty influences traditional energy (negatively) and renewable energy (positively) at the mean level. Stock market volatility has a positive spillover effect on both conventional and renewable energies in the short-run, but these spillover effects are negative in the long-run. Our estimates of the time-paths of dynamic conditional correlations provide evidence that the renewable market is more heavily “financialized” than the traditional energy market, and moreover that the strong financialization of renewables is robust to financial crises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石油、可再生能源和股票市场之间的波动溢出和条件相关性:一个多元garch均值分析
我们研究了三个不同市场之间的联系:可再生能源(由一系列可再生能源etf代表);传统能源(以原油ETF为代表);以及普通股(以标准普尔500指数ETF为代表)。我们使用从2008年到2021年的每日数据。采用的计量经济学框架是VARMA-DCC-GARCH-in-mean模型。我们发现这个框架是理想的,因为它使我们能够确定一个市场的不确定性对另一个市场回报的影响,以及波动性溢出效应,即一个市场的高度不确定性蔓延到其他市场的现象。我们的主要发现如下。股市的不确定性在平均水平上对传统能源(负)和可再生能源(正)产生影响。股票市场波动在短期内对传统能源和可再生能源都有正向的溢出效应,但在长期内这些溢出效应是负向的。我们对动态条件相关时间路径的估计提供了证据,表明可再生能源市场比传统能源市场更严重地“金融化”,而且可再生能源的强大金融化对金融危机具有很强的抵抗力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
An interpretive structural modeling-based hierarchical analysis of risk factors for sustainable power infrastructure public-private partnerships in developing countries Can economic complexity clean up digital trade? A quantile look at E7 sustainability Synergizing renewable energy, women empowerment, and policy for emissions reduction Tax policy, energy efficiency, and sustainable growth: empirical evidence from China Strategic retrofit decision modeling for net-zero airport energy systems: Hybrid optimization and policy simulation at Istanbul airport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1