Evaluation of spatial clustering methods for regionalisation of hydrogen ecosystems

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2024.101627
Friedrich Mendler , Barbara Koch , Björn Meißner , Christopher Voglstätter , Tom Smolinka
{"title":"Evaluation of spatial clustering methods for regionalisation of hydrogen ecosystems","authors":"Friedrich Mendler ,&nbsp;Barbara Koch ,&nbsp;Björn Meißner ,&nbsp;Christopher Voglstätter ,&nbsp;Tom Smolinka","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spatially resolved modelling of local hydrogen ecosystems can help to identify optimal sizing and locations for plants and infrastructure along the value chain. Spatial clustering to identify the subregions can lead to a better representation of important features compared to administrative units or uniform grids. Several algorithms are available for regionalisation, but an evaluation of their suitability for hydrogen ecosystems or similar applications is missing in the literature. This paper presents a holistic evaluation of different spatial algorithms based on existing and newly developed statistical indicators. Although the best algorithm depends on the focus of the regionalisation process, the method REDCAP proved to be the best overall, especially with higher intra-cluster homogeneity compared to the widely used k-means algorithm. The developed indicators and their evaluation regarding different objectives are seen to be transferable to other clustering and regionalisation applications, like energy system analysis or general supply chain analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101627"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24003365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatially resolved modelling of local hydrogen ecosystems can help to identify optimal sizing and locations for plants and infrastructure along the value chain. Spatial clustering to identify the subregions can lead to a better representation of important features compared to administrative units or uniform grids. Several algorithms are available for regionalisation, but an evaluation of their suitability for hydrogen ecosystems or similar applications is missing in the literature. This paper presents a holistic evaluation of different spatial algorithms based on existing and newly developed statistical indicators. Although the best algorithm depends on the focus of the regionalisation process, the method REDCAP proved to be the best overall, especially with higher intra-cluster homogeneity compared to the widely used k-means algorithm. The developed indicators and their evaluation regarding different objectives are seen to be transferable to other clustering and regionalisation applications, like energy system analysis or general supply chain analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氢生态系统区划的空间聚类方法评价
对当地氢生态系统进行空间解析建模可以帮助确定价值链上工厂和基础设施的最佳规模和位置。与行政单位或统一网格相比,识别子区域的空间聚类可以更好地表示重要特征。有几种算法可用于区域化,但文献中缺少对它们对氢生态系统或类似应用的适用性的评估。本文基于现有的和新开发的统计指标,对不同的空间算法进行了整体评价。虽然最佳算法取决于区域化过程的重点,但总体而言,REDCAP方法被证明是最好的,特别是与广泛使用的k-means算法相比,它具有更高的簇内均匀性。所制定的指标及其对不同目标的评价被视为可转移到其他群集和区域化应用,如能源系统分析或一般供应链分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
An interpretive structural modeling-based hierarchical analysis of risk factors for sustainable power infrastructure public-private partnerships in developing countries Can economic complexity clean up digital trade? A quantile look at E7 sustainability Synergizing renewable energy, women empowerment, and policy for emissions reduction Tax policy, energy efficiency, and sustainable growth: empirical evidence from China Strategic retrofit decision modeling for net-zero airport energy systems: Hybrid optimization and policy simulation at Istanbul airport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1