A review of consistency in climate action: The role of social interactions and institutions in cultivating positive behavioral spillover

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101475
Anandita Sabherwal , Gregg Sparkman
{"title":"A review of consistency in climate action: The role of social interactions and institutions in cultivating positive behavioral spillover","authors":"Anandita Sabherwal ,&nbsp;Gregg Sparkman","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the multifaceted problem of climate change, individuals must perform a range of individual and collective actions. To aid this process, research has sought to understand behavioral spillover — how one action impacts the likelihood of performing other actions. Recent theorizing emphasizes environmental identity, social norms, and affect and efficacy as key psychological mechanisms underlying positive spillover. Yet, spillover effects remain small and heterogenous. This review posits that driving positive spillover at the scale needed to mitigate climate change requires social and societal scaffolding. Emergent research leverages collective processes, including interpersonal and social interactions and institutional practices, to further amplify these psychological mechanisms and bolster positive behavioral spillover. For instance, workplaces can prompt the internalization of in-role pro-environmental behavior, resulting in positive spillovers to advocacy and household behaviors. Embedding psychological processes of behavioral spillover within collective processes presents a promising avenue to drive spillover between individual and collective climate actions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624001268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address the multifaceted problem of climate change, individuals must perform a range of individual and collective actions. To aid this process, research has sought to understand behavioral spillover — how one action impacts the likelihood of performing other actions. Recent theorizing emphasizes environmental identity, social norms, and affect and efficacy as key psychological mechanisms underlying positive spillover. Yet, spillover effects remain small and heterogenous. This review posits that driving positive spillover at the scale needed to mitigate climate change requires social and societal scaffolding. Emergent research leverages collective processes, including interpersonal and social interactions and institutional practices, to further amplify these psychological mechanisms and bolster positive behavioral spillover. For instance, workplaces can prompt the internalization of in-role pro-environmental behavior, resulting in positive spillovers to advocacy and household behaviors. Embedding psychological processes of behavioral spillover within collective processes presents a promising avenue to drive spillover between individual and collective climate actions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候行动一致性研究综述:社会互动和制度在培养积极行为溢出中的作用
为了解决气候变化的多方面问题,个人必须采取一系列个人和集体行动。为了帮助这个过程,研究试图理解行为溢出——一个行为如何影响执行其他行为的可能性。最近的理论强调环境认同、社会规范、影响和功效是积极溢出的关键心理机制。然而,溢出效应仍然很小,而且存在异质性。本综述认为,在缓解气候变化所需的规模上推动积极溢出效应需要社会和社会支撑。新兴研究利用集体过程,包括人际和社会互动以及制度实践,进一步放大这些心理机制,支持积极的行为溢出。例如,工作场所可以促进角色内亲环境行为的内化,从而对宣传和家庭行为产生积极的溢出效应。将行为溢出的心理过程嵌入到集体过程中,为推动个人和集体气候行动之间的溢出提供了一条有希望的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
What episodic memory reveals about the default mode network Understanding the association between loneliness and social media: a revised theoretical model The default mode network in a hierarchical generative model of the brain Using cognitive load tasks to constrain hypotheses about the role of the default mode network in social cognition: uncertainty reduction as a unifying framework Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1