Accuracy in identification of pre-eclampsia patients at emergency department triage: A quantitative descriptive study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101583
Lisa Wolf , Angelique Russell , Deena Brecher , Claire Simon
{"title":"Accuracy in identification of pre-eclampsia patients at emergency department triage: A quantitative descriptive study","authors":"Lisa Wolf ,&nbsp;Angelique Russell ,&nbsp;Deena Brecher ,&nbsp;Claire Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To describe the accuracy of triage decision-making in a sample of US emergency departments regarding the identification of preeclampsia in both pregnant and postpartum patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A quantitative correlative retrospective approach using a large data set to verify the impact of accurate identification of the high-risk preeclamptic patient at triage. Data were extracted from a dataset of de-identified ED records. All female-identified patients presenting to the study sites from January 1, 2022-September 30, 2023, were included. Accurate triage of patients was modeled using logistic regression to identify significance and strength of associations between ESI classification and patient disposition outcomes in high-risk patients with the specific emergency department diagnosis of preeclampsia.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final sample included over 1.3 million patients whose record contained an ICD-10 code describing suspected perinatal preeclampsia in 25 sites across four U.S. states. The percentage of high-risk perinatal presentations at triage ranged from 17.7% to 23.3% across sites; the percentage of those patients with a final (confirmed) diagnosis of preeclampsia comprised 881 patients of 243,872 high-risk presentations. Of the 881 patients with preeclampsia, 80.1% (711) were under triaged. Women in the preeclampsia cohort were 66% more likely to be in a maternal care desert and 59% were Hispanic or non-white.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While high risk pregnancy and postpartum presentations are 18.5% of the obstetric population presenting to emergency departments, they are under triaged 50% of the time; when a very high risk, low volume presentation such as preeclampsia is present, those patients are under triaged 80% of the time. Given the documented inadequacy of education related to obstetric emergencies, and growing maternal care deserts, these findings suggest a concerning situation for patients seeking pregnancy-related care in emergency departments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25000138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

To describe the accuracy of triage decision-making in a sample of US emergency departments regarding the identification of preeclampsia in both pregnant and postpartum patients.

Methods

A quantitative correlative retrospective approach using a large data set to verify the impact of accurate identification of the high-risk preeclamptic patient at triage. Data were extracted from a dataset of de-identified ED records. All female-identified patients presenting to the study sites from January 1, 2022-September 30, 2023, were included. Accurate triage of patients was modeled using logistic regression to identify significance and strength of associations between ESI classification and patient disposition outcomes in high-risk patients with the specific emergency department diagnosis of preeclampsia.

Results

The final sample included over 1.3 million patients whose record contained an ICD-10 code describing suspected perinatal preeclampsia in 25 sites across four U.S. states. The percentage of high-risk perinatal presentations at triage ranged from 17.7% to 23.3% across sites; the percentage of those patients with a final (confirmed) diagnosis of preeclampsia comprised 881 patients of 243,872 high-risk presentations. Of the 881 patients with preeclampsia, 80.1% (711) were under triaged. Women in the preeclampsia cohort were 66% more likely to be in a maternal care desert and 59% were Hispanic or non-white.

Conclusions

While high risk pregnancy and postpartum presentations are 18.5% of the obstetric population presenting to emergency departments, they are under triaged 50% of the time; when a very high risk, low volume presentation such as preeclampsia is present, those patients are under triaged 80% of the time. Given the documented inadequacy of education related to obstetric emergencies, and growing maternal care deserts, these findings suggest a concerning situation for patients seeking pregnancy-related care in emergency departments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Major disaster, profound impact: A qualitative examination of emergency department nurses’ experiences during the 2023 Turkey Maraş earthquake Interventions to retain emergency department nurses: A scoping review Comment on “Telenursing as a tool in emergencies and disasters: A systematic review” Nurses’ perceptions of clinical leadership in the emergency department: A qualitative descriptive study Risk Factors and Preventive Measures of Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma Patients using Trauma Embolic Scoring System: A retrospective chart review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1