Addressing decarbonization strategies through a game theory perspective

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108137
Elizabeth A. Moore , Karan Bhuwalka , Andy Zhu , Yijia Chen , Panya Tang , Jennifer D. Russell , Randolph Kirchain , Richard Roth
{"title":"Addressing decarbonization strategies through a game theory perspective","authors":"Elizabeth A. Moore ,&nbsp;Karan Bhuwalka ,&nbsp;Andy Zhu ,&nbsp;Yijia Chen ,&nbsp;Panya Tang ,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Russell ,&nbsp;Randolph Kirchain ,&nbsp;Richard Roth","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global demand for metals is rapidly increasing due to population growth, technological innovation, and economic growth. To meet this demand, mining firms adopt various strategies, which often lead to increased carbon emissions. Decarbonization efforts could be supported by economic policies that encourage lower emissions. Since mining industries consist of individual stakeholders, policies should consider their competitive behavior rather than the industry-as-a-whole. A game theory framework applied to an oligopoly scenario of four mining firms reveals that firms, acting individually, tend to expand production more than if they considered the industry-as-a-whole. This leads to environmental consequences, price depression, and reduced profitability. This game theory perspective helps identify economic policies that could guide firms toward mining the least damaging ore.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 108137"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925000163","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global demand for metals is rapidly increasing due to population growth, technological innovation, and economic growth. To meet this demand, mining firms adopt various strategies, which often lead to increased carbon emissions. Decarbonization efforts could be supported by economic policies that encourage lower emissions. Since mining industries consist of individual stakeholders, policies should consider their competitive behavior rather than the industry-as-a-whole. A game theory framework applied to an oligopoly scenario of four mining firms reveals that firms, acting individually, tend to expand production more than if they considered the industry-as-a-whole. This leads to environmental consequences, price depression, and reduced profitability. This game theory perspective helps identify economic policies that could guide firms toward mining the least damaging ore.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从博弈论的角度探讨脱碳策略
由于人口增长、技术创新和经济增长,全球对金属的需求正在迅速增加。为了满足这种需求,矿业公司采取了各种策略,这往往导致碳排放增加。鼓励低排放的经济政策可以支持脱碳工作。由于采矿业由个别利益相关者组成,政策应考虑他们的竞争行为,而不是整个行业。一个应用于四家矿业公司寡头垄断情景的博弈论框架表明,单独行动的公司倾向于扩大生产,而不是将整个行业视为一个整体。这将导致环境问题、价格低迷和盈利能力下降。这种博弈论的观点有助于确定可以引导企业开采危害最小的矿石的经济政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electricity generated from waste coal in the United States The impacts of input data on visual-language models (VLM) in automated solid waste recognition Unveiling potential water and land resource pressures under the electrolytic hydrogen boom in China Sustainable food waste valorization pathways through co-treatment with wastewater: A bench-scale study One-step conversion into Al2O3 coated Si nanowire anode from photovoltaic silicon waste wafers through electrothermal shock for excellent capacity retention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1