Evaluating global progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 7 over space and time by a more comprehensive energy sustainability index

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2024.101626
Qi Zhao , Xi Lu , Rachael Marie Fleming
{"title":"Evaluating global progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 7 over space and time by a more comprehensive energy sustainability index","authors":"Qi Zhao ,&nbsp;Xi Lu ,&nbsp;Rachael Marie Fleming","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantifying progress towards achieving the 7th Sustainable Development Goal (SDG7) is essential for tracking global efforts on sustainable energy transition as well as guiding policy development. However, there is a lack of comprehensive assessment frameworks with consideration of temporal-and-regional dynamics. Targeting this research gap, we developed an Energy Sustainability Index (ESI) with 5 dimensions and 12 indicators to measure the progress of SDG7 in 140 countries around the world from 2011 to 2020, with a particular emphasis on its geographical inequality. Results show that while the global average ESI score has increased by 6.7 % from 2011 to 2020, this growth was largely dependent on the rapid development of a few emerging economies, with the growth rate in the rest of the world still lagging. In addition, most of the regions have failed to balance development across the 5 dimensions of the ESI, causing a regression in some dimensions, notably energy reliability. Analysis of inter-population inequality shows that although global inequality in energy development declined by 14.3 % in the period of 2011–2020, the extreme low scores of the Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) remained virtually unchanged, implying that energy development in LDCs needs more attention. This study provides a new paradigm for further exploration in the spatial and temporal characteristics of energy sustainability and highlights the urgency of promoting SDG7 globally in a holistic and synergistic approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101626"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24003353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying progress towards achieving the 7th Sustainable Development Goal (SDG7) is essential for tracking global efforts on sustainable energy transition as well as guiding policy development. However, there is a lack of comprehensive assessment frameworks with consideration of temporal-and-regional dynamics. Targeting this research gap, we developed an Energy Sustainability Index (ESI) with 5 dimensions and 12 indicators to measure the progress of SDG7 in 140 countries around the world from 2011 to 2020, with a particular emphasis on its geographical inequality. Results show that while the global average ESI score has increased by 6.7 % from 2011 to 2020, this growth was largely dependent on the rapid development of a few emerging economies, with the growth rate in the rest of the world still lagging. In addition, most of the regions have failed to balance development across the 5 dimensions of the ESI, causing a regression in some dimensions, notably energy reliability. Analysis of inter-population inequality shows that although global inequality in energy development declined by 14.3 % in the period of 2011–2020, the extreme low scores of the Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) remained virtually unchanged, implying that energy development in LDCs needs more attention. This study provides a new paradigm for further exploration in the spatial and temporal characteristics of energy sustainability and highlights the urgency of promoting SDG7 globally in a holistic and synergistic approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过更全面的能源可持续性指数评估全球在实现可持续发展目标7方面的时空进展
量化实现第七个可持续发展目标的进展,对于跟踪全球在可持续能源转型方面的努力以及指导政策制定至关重要。然而,缺乏考虑到时间和区域动态的综合评估框架。针对这一研究差距,我们开发了一个包含5个维度和12个指标的能源可持续发展指数(ESI),以衡量2011年至2020年全球140个国家的可持续发展七国集团的进展,并特别强调其地理不平等。结果表明,虽然2011年至2020年全球ESI平均得分增长了6.7%,但这种增长在很大程度上依赖于少数新兴经济体的快速发展,而世界其他地区的增长速度仍然滞后。此外,大部分地区未能在ESI的5个维度上实现平衡发展,导致某些维度的回归,特别是能源可靠性。对人口间不平等的分析表明,尽管全球能源发展不平等在2011-2020年期间下降了14.3%,但最不发达国家(LDCs)的极低得分几乎没有变化,这意味着最不发达国家的能源发展需要得到更多关注。该研究为进一步探索能源可持续性的时空特征提供了新的范式,并强调了以整体和协同的方式在全球范围内推动SDG7的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
An interpretive structural modeling-based hierarchical analysis of risk factors for sustainable power infrastructure public-private partnerships in developing countries Can economic complexity clean up digital trade? A quantile look at E7 sustainability Synergizing renewable energy, women empowerment, and policy for emissions reduction Tax policy, energy efficiency, and sustainable growth: empirical evidence from China Strategic retrofit decision modeling for net-zero airport energy systems: Hybrid optimization and policy simulation at Istanbul airport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1