{"title":"New Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” in comparison with Buy-back and Production Sharing Agreement","authors":"Mohammad Ali Bahmaei , Ehsan Afshar","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” as a risk service contract, contains some important improvements and features in order to attract foreign investments and know-how to the long-standing oil industry of Iran. However, the views of international oil companies (“IOC”) towards contractual regimes in the oil sector show that they are often not eager to enter into the risk service-prone contracts and therefore, IPC is another alternative and a new opportunity for IOCs to invest in the oil industry in Iran, as compared with Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and modern concessions.</div><div>According to the current laws and regulations, adopting PSA in Iran's oil industry is not strictly forbidden from legal point of view. Therefore, using a well-designed PSA, at least for some high risk and cost regions, may ensure the balance of interests between National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”) and foreign oil companies, without disrupting the existing IPC's framework. Thus, through JCPOA and removal of the sanctions, the Iranian authorities in the oil industry should be prepared to take more flexible and favorable attitude towards the petroleum contracts in Iran for the benefit of the country in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101599"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24003080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” as a risk service contract, contains some important improvements and features in order to attract foreign investments and know-how to the long-standing oil industry of Iran. However, the views of international oil companies (“IOC”) towards contractual regimes in the oil sector show that they are often not eager to enter into the risk service-prone contracts and therefore, IPC is another alternative and a new opportunity for IOCs to invest in the oil industry in Iran, as compared with Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and modern concessions.
According to the current laws and regulations, adopting PSA in Iran's oil industry is not strictly forbidden from legal point of view. Therefore, using a well-designed PSA, at least for some high risk and cost regions, may ensure the balance of interests between National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”) and foreign oil companies, without disrupting the existing IPC's framework. Thus, through JCPOA and removal of the sanctions, the Iranian authorities in the oil industry should be prepared to take more flexible and favorable attitude towards the petroleum contracts in Iran for the benefit of the country in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations.
期刊介绍:
Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs.
Energy Strategy Reviews publishes:
• Analyses
• Methodologies
• Case Studies
• Reviews
And by invitation:
• Report Reviews
• Viewpoints