New Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” in comparison with Buy-back and Production Sharing Agreement

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2024.101599
Mohammad Ali Bahmaei , Ehsan Afshar
{"title":"New Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” in comparison with Buy-back and Production Sharing Agreement","authors":"Mohammad Ali Bahmaei ,&nbsp;Ehsan Afshar","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” as a risk service contract, contains some important improvements and features in order to attract foreign investments and know-how to the long-standing oil industry of Iran. However, the views of international oil companies (“IOC”) towards contractual regimes in the oil sector show that they are often not eager to enter into the risk service-prone contracts and therefore, IPC is another alternative and a new opportunity for IOCs to invest in the oil industry in Iran, as compared with Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and modern concessions.</div><div>According to the current laws and regulations, adopting PSA in Iran's oil industry is not strictly forbidden from legal point of view. Therefore, using a well-designed PSA, at least for some high risk and cost regions, may ensure the balance of interests between National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”) and foreign oil companies, without disrupting the existing IPC's framework. Thus, through JCPOA and removal of the sanctions, the Iranian authorities in the oil industry should be prepared to take more flexible and favorable attitude towards the petroleum contracts in Iran for the benefit of the country in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101599"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24003080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Iran's Petroleum Contract “IPC” as a risk service contract, contains some important improvements and features in order to attract foreign investments and know-how to the long-standing oil industry of Iran. However, the views of international oil companies (“IOC”) towards contractual regimes in the oil sector show that they are often not eager to enter into the risk service-prone contracts and therefore, IPC is another alternative and a new opportunity for IOCs to invest in the oil industry in Iran, as compared with Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and modern concessions.
According to the current laws and regulations, adopting PSA in Iran's oil industry is not strictly forbidden from legal point of view. Therefore, using a well-designed PSA, at least for some high risk and cost regions, may ensure the balance of interests between National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”) and foreign oil companies, without disrupting the existing IPC's framework. Thus, through JCPOA and removal of the sanctions, the Iranian authorities in the oil industry should be prepared to take more flexible and favorable attitude towards the petroleum contracts in Iran for the benefit of the country in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新伊朗石油合同“IPC”与回购和生产分成协议的比较
伊朗石油合同“IPC”作为一项风险服务合同,包含了一些重要的改进和特点,以吸引外国投资和伊朗长期存在的石油工业的专业知识。然而,国际石油公司(IOC)对石油行业合同制度的看法表明,他们通常不急于签订风险服务倾向的合同,因此,与产量分成协议(PSA)和现代特许权相比,IPC是国际石油公司投资伊朗石油行业的另一种选择和新机会。根据目前的法律法规,从法律的角度来看,伊朗石油行业采用PSA并不是严格禁止的。因此,至少在一些高风险和高成本地区,使用设计良好的PSA可以确保伊朗国家石油公司(“NIOC”)和外国石油公司之间的利益平衡,而不会破坏现有的IPC框架。因此,通过全面协议和解除制裁,伊朗石油业当局应做好准备,在遵守相关法律法规的前提下,对伊朗的石油合同采取更加灵活和有利的态度,以维护伊朗的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
An interpretive structural modeling-based hierarchical analysis of risk factors for sustainable power infrastructure public-private partnerships in developing countries Can economic complexity clean up digital trade? A quantile look at E7 sustainability Synergizing renewable energy, women empowerment, and policy for emissions reduction Tax policy, energy efficiency, and sustainable growth: empirical evidence from China Strategic retrofit decision modeling for net-zero airport energy systems: Hybrid optimization and policy simulation at Istanbul airport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1