Characteristics and outcome of critical care patients undergoing tracheostomy in a medical intensive care setting: A retrospective single center analysis of 1570 procedures in 12 years

IF 1.4 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101519
Tim Schroeder, Jens Nee, Sarah Kamel, Christian Storm, Carl Hinrichs, Florian Marcy , Bettina Schueler
{"title":"Characteristics and outcome of critical care patients undergoing tracheostomy in a medical intensive care setting: A retrospective single center analysis of 1570 procedures in 12 years","authors":"Tim Schroeder,&nbsp;Jens Nee,&nbsp;Sarah Kamel,&nbsp;Christian Storm,&nbsp;Carl Hinrichs,&nbsp;Florian Marcy ,&nbsp;Bettina Schueler","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tracheostomy is often indicated for patients requiring prolonged ventilation, as it can facilitate weaning from the ventilator, reduce work of breathing and allow cessation of sedation. Optimal timing and mode of tracheostomy is still under debate.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the technique, timing, and clinical outcomes of tracheostomy in a large single-center cohort of medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive patients undergoing tracheostomy between 2006 and 2018 in a medical ICU. Patients received either a percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy or surgical tracheostomy. Data collected included patient demographics, APACHE-II scores, ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stays, tracheostomy technique, and timing of tracheostomy relative to intubation and initiation of mechanical ventilation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1570 tracheostomies were analyzed, comprising 1323 (84.2 %) dilatational tracheostomies and 247 (15.8 %) surgical tracheostomies. The type of tracheostomy did not significantly affect length of stays or length of mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analysis based on tracheostomy timing revealed that early tracheostomy (&lt;7 days post-intubation) was associated with shorter length of mechanical ventilation (p &lt; 0.001), reduced length of stays (p &lt; 0.001), and lower mortality (p = 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis identified early tracheostomy as an independent predictor of reduced mortality, while tracheostomy type had no significant effect on mortality outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Early tracheostomy, within seven days of intubation, was associated with improved survival, shorter length of mechanical ventilation, and reduced ICU stays, independent of the tracheostomy technique in our retrospective cohort in medical ICU patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844025000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracheostomy is often indicated for patients requiring prolonged ventilation, as it can facilitate weaning from the ventilator, reduce work of breathing and allow cessation of sedation. Optimal timing and mode of tracheostomy is still under debate.

Objective

To evaluate the technique, timing, and clinical outcomes of tracheostomy in a large single-center cohort of medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive patients undergoing tracheostomy between 2006 and 2018 in a medical ICU. Patients received either a percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy or surgical tracheostomy. Data collected included patient demographics, APACHE-II scores, ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stays, tracheostomy technique, and timing of tracheostomy relative to intubation and initiation of mechanical ventilation.

Results

A total of 1570 tracheostomies were analyzed, comprising 1323 (84.2 %) dilatational tracheostomies and 247 (15.8 %) surgical tracheostomies. The type of tracheostomy did not significantly affect length of stays or length of mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analysis based on tracheostomy timing revealed that early tracheostomy (<7 days post-intubation) was associated with shorter length of mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), reduced length of stays (p < 0.001), and lower mortality (p = 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis identified early tracheostomy as an independent predictor of reduced mortality, while tracheostomy type had no significant effect on mortality outcomes.

Conclusion

Early tracheostomy, within seven days of intubation, was associated with improved survival, shorter length of mechanical ventilation, and reduced ICU stays, independent of the tracheostomy technique in our retrospective cohort in medical ICU patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Challenges in laryngeal mask ventilation: Case of a vocal cord polyp Identifying and analyzing extremely productive authors in intensive care medicine: A scientometric analysis Recent advances in the development of invasive ventilator liberation Incision depth in surgical airway management using computed tomography of the neck to minimize complications Characteristics and outcome of critical care patients undergoing tracheostomy in a medical intensive care setting: A retrospective single center analysis of 1570 procedures in 12 years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1