Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma post-avelumab maintenance approval: insights from The US Oncology Network

H. Li , S. Sura , A. Babcock , L. Herms , J. Guo , P. Conkling , S. Franco , P. Singhal , R. Mamtani , M. Bupathi
{"title":"Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma post-avelumab maintenance approval: insights from The US Oncology Network","authors":"H. Li ,&nbsp;S. Sura ,&nbsp;A. Babcock ,&nbsp;L. Herms ,&nbsp;J. Guo ,&nbsp;P. Conkling ,&nbsp;S. Franco ,&nbsp;P. Singhal ,&nbsp;R. Mamtani ,&nbsp;M. Bupathi","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody–drug conjugates into the metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) treatment landscape has advanced therapeutic strategies beyond platinum-based chemotherapy (PBT). We evaluated real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) among mUC patients during the period between maintenance avelumab (maintA) and enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab approvals in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study utilized structured and chart review data from iKnowMed, a United States community oncology electronic health record database, to identify adult mUC patients initiating first-line (1L) anticancer treatment (index date) between April 2020 and September 2022. Patients were followed from the index date until March 2023, the last patient visit, or death, whichever occurred first. Descriptive statistics were used to report treatment patterns. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to assess OS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 597 patients initiated 1L treatments (ICI monotherapy: 47.9%, PBT: 40.7%, other: 11.4%). The median age at diagnosis was 74 years, and 76.9% were male. Among patients receiving 1L PBT, 39.5% received maintA. Among those who were not on prior treatment at the end of the follow-up, 32.7% and 11.3% of 1L-treated patients received second-line and third-line treatment. The median OS from the index date for 1L-treated patients was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval 10.4-14.2 months).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite the approval of maintenance therapy, prognoses for mUC patients remained poor. ICI monotherapy continues to be a common option in 1L. Many 1L patients did not have an opportunity to receive subsequent treatment, highlighting the continuing unmet need for mUC patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody–drug conjugates into the metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) treatment landscape has advanced therapeutic strategies beyond platinum-based chemotherapy (PBT). We evaluated real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) among mUC patients during the period between maintenance avelumab (maintA) and enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab approvals in the United States.

Materials and methods

This retrospective cohort study utilized structured and chart review data from iKnowMed, a United States community oncology electronic health record database, to identify adult mUC patients initiating first-line (1L) anticancer treatment (index date) between April 2020 and September 2022. Patients were followed from the index date until March 2023, the last patient visit, or death, whichever occurred first. Descriptive statistics were used to report treatment patterns. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to assess OS.

Results

A total of 597 patients initiated 1L treatments (ICI monotherapy: 47.9%, PBT: 40.7%, other: 11.4%). The median age at diagnosis was 74 years, and 76.9% were male. Among patients receiving 1L PBT, 39.5% received maintA. Among those who were not on prior treatment at the end of the follow-up, 32.7% and 11.3% of 1L-treated patients received second-line and third-line treatment. The median OS from the index date for 1L-treated patients was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval 10.4-14.2 months).

Conclusions

Despite the approval of maintenance therapy, prognoses for mUC patients remained poor. ICI monotherapy continues to be a common option in 1L. Many 1L patients did not have an opportunity to receive subsequent treatment, highlighting the continuing unmet need for mUC patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转移性尿路上皮癌患者在avelumab维持批准后不断变化的治疗模式和结果:来自美国肿瘤网络的见解
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和抗体-药物偶联物加入转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)治疗领域,使治疗策略超越了基于铂的化疗(PBT)。我们评估了在美国维持性avelumab (maintA)和enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab批准期间mUC患者的实际治疗模式和总生存期(OS)。材料和方法本回顾性队列研究利用美国社区肿瘤学电子健康记录数据库iKnowMed的结构化和图表回顾数据,确定在2020年4月至2022年9月期间开始一线(1L)抗癌治疗的成年mUC患者(索引日期)。患者从索引日期开始随访至2023年3月,即患者最后一次就诊或死亡,以先发生者为准。描述性统计用于报告治疗模式。采用Kaplan-Meier法评价OS。结果597例患者接受了1L治疗,其中ICI单药占47.9%,PBT占40.7%,其他占11.4%。诊断时的中位年龄为74岁,76.9%为男性。在接受1L PBT治疗的患者中,39.5%接受了maintA治疗。在随访结束时未接受治疗的患者中,接受1l治疗的患者中有32.7%和11.3%接受了二线和三线治疗。从指标日期起,l治疗患者的中位OS为11.8个月(95%置信区间为10.4-14.2个月)。结论尽管维持治疗获得批准,但mUC患者的预后仍然很差。ICI单药治疗仍然是1L的常见选择。许多1L患者没有机会接受后续治疗,突出了mUC患者的持续未满足需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AI assistance in tumor multidisciplinary teams Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis: a narrative review Predictors of acute lymphopenia after radiotherapy for prostate cancer including pelvic node irradiation: results of a real-world prospective multi-centric study How to bring generative AI to oncology practice Predicting efficacy in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with immunotherapy using explainable machine learning approaches: the SamUR-AI trial on behalf of the Meet-URO group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1