{"title":"Exploring the impact of social network structures on toxicity in online mental health communities","authors":"Ezgi Akar","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how structural social capital influences online toxicity within mental health communities. Using social network analysis and regression models, we analyze both direct and interaction effects of network centralities—degree, closeness, eigenvector, and betweenness—on toxicity in the r/MentalHealth subreddit. From a dataset of 90,626 posts, we constructed a network of 7562 users interconnected through 12,699,868 relationships. Our findings highlight the nuanced relationship between network positioning and toxic behavior. Users with a higher degree centrality, reflecting broad connectivity, exhibit lower toxicity levels, indicating that well-connected individuals contribute positively to community dynamics. Conversely, higher eigenvector, closeness, and betweenness centralities are associated with increased toxicity, suggesting that influential users, those centrally located, and those acting as bridges between network segments are more likely to engage in toxic behavior. Interaction effects further reveal complexities: for instance, well-connected and influential users tend to mitigate toxicity, while those who combine influence with proximity amplify it. These insights underscore the dual role of network structures in moderating or exacerbating harmful interactions. The study offers actionable strategies for fostering healthier online environments by leveraging network centralities to design targeted interventions and reduce toxicity in online mental health communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108542"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224004102","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines how structural social capital influences online toxicity within mental health communities. Using social network analysis and regression models, we analyze both direct and interaction effects of network centralities—degree, closeness, eigenvector, and betweenness—on toxicity in the r/MentalHealth subreddit. From a dataset of 90,626 posts, we constructed a network of 7562 users interconnected through 12,699,868 relationships. Our findings highlight the nuanced relationship between network positioning and toxic behavior. Users with a higher degree centrality, reflecting broad connectivity, exhibit lower toxicity levels, indicating that well-connected individuals contribute positively to community dynamics. Conversely, higher eigenvector, closeness, and betweenness centralities are associated with increased toxicity, suggesting that influential users, those centrally located, and those acting as bridges between network segments are more likely to engage in toxic behavior. Interaction effects further reveal complexities: for instance, well-connected and influential users tend to mitigate toxicity, while those who combine influence with proximity amplify it. These insights underscore the dual role of network structures in moderating or exacerbating harmful interactions. The study offers actionable strategies for fostering healthier online environments by leveraging network centralities to design targeted interventions and reduce toxicity in online mental health communities.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.