Exploring the impact of social network structures on toxicity in online mental health communities

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108542
Ezgi Akar
{"title":"Exploring the impact of social network structures on toxicity in online mental health communities","authors":"Ezgi Akar","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how structural social capital influences online toxicity within mental health communities. Using social network analysis and regression models, we analyze both direct and interaction effects of network centralities—degree, closeness, eigenvector, and betweenness—on toxicity in the r/MentalHealth subreddit. From a dataset of 90,626 posts, we constructed a network of 7562 users interconnected through 12,699,868 relationships. Our findings highlight the nuanced relationship between network positioning and toxic behavior. Users with a higher degree centrality, reflecting broad connectivity, exhibit lower toxicity levels, indicating that well-connected individuals contribute positively to community dynamics. Conversely, higher eigenvector, closeness, and betweenness centralities are associated with increased toxicity, suggesting that influential users, those centrally located, and those acting as bridges between network segments are more likely to engage in toxic behavior. Interaction effects further reveal complexities: for instance, well-connected and influential users tend to mitigate toxicity, while those who combine influence with proximity amplify it. These insights underscore the dual role of network structures in moderating or exacerbating harmful interactions. The study offers actionable strategies for fostering healthier online environments by leveraging network centralities to design targeted interventions and reduce toxicity in online mental health communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108542"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224004102","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how structural social capital influences online toxicity within mental health communities. Using social network analysis and regression models, we analyze both direct and interaction effects of network centralities—degree, closeness, eigenvector, and betweenness—on toxicity in the r/MentalHealth subreddit. From a dataset of 90,626 posts, we constructed a network of 7562 users interconnected through 12,699,868 relationships. Our findings highlight the nuanced relationship between network positioning and toxic behavior. Users with a higher degree centrality, reflecting broad connectivity, exhibit lower toxicity levels, indicating that well-connected individuals contribute positively to community dynamics. Conversely, higher eigenvector, closeness, and betweenness centralities are associated with increased toxicity, suggesting that influential users, those centrally located, and those acting as bridges between network segments are more likely to engage in toxic behavior. Interaction effects further reveal complexities: for instance, well-connected and influential users tend to mitigate toxicity, while those who combine influence with proximity amplify it. These insights underscore the dual role of network structures in moderating or exacerbating harmful interactions. The study offers actionable strategies for fostering healthier online environments by leveraging network centralities to design targeted interventions and reduce toxicity in online mental health communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索社会网络结构对在线心理健康社区毒性的影响
本研究探讨了结构性社会资本如何影响心理健康社区的网络毒性。利用社会网络分析和回归模型,我们分析了网络中心性——程度、亲密度、特征向量和间性——对reddit r/MentalHealth版块毒性的直接影响和交互影响。从90,626个帖子的数据集中,我们构建了一个由7562个用户组成的网络,通过12,699,868个关系相互连接。我们的发现强调了网络定位和有毒行为之间的微妙关系。中心性较高的用户,反映了广泛的连通性,表现出较低的毒性水平,表明关系良好的个人对社区动态做出了积极的贡献。相反,较高的特征向量、接近度和中间度中心性与毒性增加有关,这表明有影响力的用户、位于中心位置的用户以及在网络段之间充当桥梁的用户更有可能参与毒性行为。互动效应进一步揭示了复杂性:例如,关系良好且有影响力的用户倾向于减轻毒性,而那些将影响力与接近结合起来的用户则会放大毒性。这些见解强调了网络结构在缓和或加剧有害互动方面的双重作用。该研究提供了可操作的策略,通过利用网络中心来设计有针对性的干预措施并减少在线心理健康社区的毒性,从而促进更健康的在线环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Can AI reflect public opinion? Evidence from replicating Hainmueller and Hopkins’ immigration experiment with LLMs Not seeing eye to eye: The effects of perceptual conflicts during social interactions in mixed reality The influence of cyber descriptive norms on immoral online behavior: The moderating role of moral conviction1 Engaging with cybercriminals: phases and influence strategies in ransomware negotiations When algorithms remember what employees forget: Reversing the common view that artificial intelligence (AI) workplace advisors lack context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1