Knowledge sourcing by multi-locational firms in Chinese cities: Mining and integrating local knowledge stocks in private and state-owned firms

IF 4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Applied Geography Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103487
Yiou Zhang , David L. Rigby
{"title":"Knowledge sourcing by multi-locational firms in Chinese cities: Mining and integrating local knowledge stocks in private and state-owned firms","authors":"Yiou Zhang ,&nbsp;David L. Rigby","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A linked firm-patent dataset is generated for a sample of approximately 400 domestic, multi-locational firms operating in China over the period 2001-15. Analysis focuses on the character of technologies produced within the different R&amp;D plants of these firms. We show that most multi-unit firms produce different kinds of knowledge within their R&amp;D units and that the likelihood of technology differences increases with the number of R&amp;D plants within each firm. Evidence of a geography of knowledge sourcing is presented that rests on the technological similarity between the patents produced within a firm's R&amp;D plants and those produced in the cities where those plants are located. We also find that the average complexity of patents generated by firms is positively related to the number of R&amp;D units that they operate. That these benefits emerge for multi-locational firms operating within a single country suggests that the constraints on knowledge diffusion operate at a relatively disaggregate spatial scale. Finally, our results indicate that collaboration between headquarters and non-headquarters R&amp;D units within firms has a differential impact on the complexity of knowledge produced and that state versus private ownership of firms influences the nature and impact of intra-firm collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103487"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622824002923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A linked firm-patent dataset is generated for a sample of approximately 400 domestic, multi-locational firms operating in China over the period 2001-15. Analysis focuses on the character of technologies produced within the different R&D plants of these firms. We show that most multi-unit firms produce different kinds of knowledge within their R&D units and that the likelihood of technology differences increases with the number of R&D plants within each firm. Evidence of a geography of knowledge sourcing is presented that rests on the technological similarity between the patents produced within a firm's R&D plants and those produced in the cities where those plants are located. We also find that the average complexity of patents generated by firms is positively related to the number of R&D units that they operate. That these benefits emerge for multi-locational firms operating within a single country suggests that the constraints on knowledge diffusion operate at a relatively disaggregate spatial scale. Finally, our results indicate that collaboration between headquarters and non-headquarters R&D units within firms has a differential impact on the complexity of knowledge produced and that state versus private ownership of firms influences the nature and impact of intra-firm collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The role of geographical location for work-life balance satisfaction: Insights from Italian coworking spaces Characteristics and spatial-temporal dynamics in agronomic landscape: Case study of Guangrong watershed, Northeast China Understanding multi-scale educational and hukou segregation in urban China: A multilevel modeling approach Knowledge sourcing by multi-locational firms in Chinese cities: Mining and integrating local knowledge stocks in private and state-owned firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1