Children's trust in Google's ability to answer questions about the past, present, and future

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108496
Lauren N. Girouard-Hallam , Judith H. Danovitch
{"title":"Children's trust in Google's ability to answer questions about the past, present, and future","authors":"Lauren N. Girouard-Hallam ,&nbsp;Judith H. Danovitch","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Across two studies, 164 7- to 10-year-old children (80 girls, 84 boys) were asked to evaluate both Google's and a person's ability to answer questions about past, present, and future events and to choose which of the two informants would provide the better answer. Google search is a powerful tool for finding the answers to questions, and many children use Google search to learn more about the world around them. Google not only provides access to information about past events or general knowledge information, but it can also provide access to information about current events, i.e., events in progress that may change or develop as time passes, such as breaking news, sports scores, or election results, and predictions about future events. Cross-classified multilevel modeling revealed that all participants had a consistent preference for Google when the target question concerned past events, and that their trust in Google increased with age for questions about current events. Children were more skeptical about both informants' ability to answer questions that required future prediction, but still expressed a preference for Google in these questions. Finally, children's justifications for why they chose Google suggested that children turn to the search engine because they believe that it has access to a wide array of information. Children therefore place high levels of trust in Google search, but their trust is nuanced by the kind of information being sought.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108496"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224003649","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across two studies, 164 7- to 10-year-old children (80 girls, 84 boys) were asked to evaluate both Google's and a person's ability to answer questions about past, present, and future events and to choose which of the two informants would provide the better answer. Google search is a powerful tool for finding the answers to questions, and many children use Google search to learn more about the world around them. Google not only provides access to information about past events or general knowledge information, but it can also provide access to information about current events, i.e., events in progress that may change or develop as time passes, such as breaking news, sports scores, or election results, and predictions about future events. Cross-classified multilevel modeling revealed that all participants had a consistent preference for Google when the target question concerned past events, and that their trust in Google increased with age for questions about current events. Children were more skeptical about both informants' ability to answer questions that required future prediction, but still expressed a preference for Google in these questions. Finally, children's justifications for why they chose Google suggested that children turn to the search engine because they believe that it has access to a wide array of information. Children therefore place high levels of trust in Google search, but their trust is nuanced by the kind of information being sought.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孩子们相信爸爸有能力回答关于过去、现在和未来的问题
在两项研究中,164名7岁到10岁的儿童(80名女孩,84名男孩)被要求评估孩子和一个人回答关于过去、现在和未来事件的能力,并选择哪一个能提供更好的答案。谷歌搜索是寻找问题答案的强大工具,许多孩子使用谷歌搜索来更多地了解他们周围的世界。谷歌不仅提供对过去事件信息或一般知识信息的访问,而且还提供对当前事件信息的访问,即可能随着时间的推移而改变或发展的正在进行的事件,如突发新闻、体育比分或选举结果,以及对未来事件的预测。交叉分类多层次模型显示,当目标问题涉及过去事件时,所有参与者对谷歌的偏好一致,并且对于当前事件的问题,他们对谷歌的信任随着年龄的增长而增加。孩子们更怀疑两名举报人回答需要预测未来的问题的能力,但在这些问题中仍然表现出对谷歌的偏好。最后,孩子们对他们为什么选择b谷歌的理由表明,孩子们转向搜索引擎是因为他们相信它可以访问广泛的信息。因此,孩子们对谷歌搜索的信任程度很高,但他们的信任随着所寻找的信息的种类而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Disclosures and literacy as determinants of AI-influencer recognition and well-being Deepfaking the past: Memory and perceived truth of resurrected historical figures Knowledge sharing in networked communities of practice: Computational network analysis of organizing dynamics in online crowdsourcing communities Can AI reflect public opinion? Evidence from replicating Hainmueller and Hopkins’ immigration experiment with LLMs Not seeing eye to eye: The effects of perceptual conflicts during social interactions in mixed reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1