From social media to policy: Public insights on transport communication and services in Queensland

Shane Mathews , Jenny Hou , Tan Yigitcanlar , Fahimeh Golbabaei , Nayomi Kankanamge , Adam Downie , Alexander Paz
{"title":"From social media to policy: Public insights on transport communication and services in Queensland","authors":"Shane Mathews ,&nbsp;Jenny Hou ,&nbsp;Tan Yigitcanlar ,&nbsp;Fahimeh Golbabaei ,&nbsp;Nayomi Kankanamge ,&nbsp;Adam Downie ,&nbsp;Alexander Paz","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study seeks to understand public opinion related to transport communication and services by delving into citizens’ insights highlighted in online posts. Public perceptions of transport communication and services is fundamental to developing more efficient, inclusive, and user-centered transportation. The objective was to reveal how Queenslanders perceive transportation communication and associated services within the broader digital discourse. It explores the accessibility of current communication platforms and channels employed by the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (Australia), with focus on public perceptions of transportation communication and services. A Netnography approach was used to analyze public comments from social and digital media to decipher prevailing sentiments and topics. Seven key themes in public discussions were identified: energy, disability, government funding, expansion of transport infrastructure, digital technology, health and safety, and quality of service. Among these ‘digital technology’ and ‘quality of service’ are directly related to communication, representing the use of digital tools to provide access to key transport-related information and the level of satisfaction with public transportation services. Despite generally positive attitudes towards transportation in Queensland, the study highlights a significant opportunity to enhance communication strategies and services to improve overall user experience, making transportation systems more user-friendly and accessible. The findings offer a consolidated understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of current transportation services and communication strategies across Queensland from the public’s perspective. Hence, transportation authorities can make informed decisions that reflect community priorities, needs, and desires, leading to improved service provision and develop effective and sustainable transportation solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101324"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259019822500003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study seeks to understand public opinion related to transport communication and services by delving into citizens’ insights highlighted in online posts. Public perceptions of transport communication and services is fundamental to developing more efficient, inclusive, and user-centered transportation. The objective was to reveal how Queenslanders perceive transportation communication and associated services within the broader digital discourse. It explores the accessibility of current communication platforms and channels employed by the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (Australia), with focus on public perceptions of transportation communication and services. A Netnography approach was used to analyze public comments from social and digital media to decipher prevailing sentiments and topics. Seven key themes in public discussions were identified: energy, disability, government funding, expansion of transport infrastructure, digital technology, health and safety, and quality of service. Among these ‘digital technology’ and ‘quality of service’ are directly related to communication, representing the use of digital tools to provide access to key transport-related information and the level of satisfaction with public transportation services. Despite generally positive attitudes towards transportation in Queensland, the study highlights a significant opportunity to enhance communication strategies and services to improve overall user experience, making transportation systems more user-friendly and accessible. The findings offer a consolidated understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of current transportation services and communication strategies across Queensland from the public’s perspective. Hence, transportation authorities can make informed decisions that reflect community priorities, needs, and desires, leading to improved service provision and develop effective and sustainable transportation solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sensitivities of weighting methods in the sustainability assessment of public transport in Latin American cities Citizen-centric design in mHealth: Concept mapping for active transportation promotion Using computer vision and street-level videos for pedestrian-vehicle tracking and behaviour analysis Public transit of the future: Enhancing well-being through designing human-centered public transportation spaces Data linkage between health and compensation systems improves the profiling of transport-related injuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1