Controversias en la revascularización y el estudio de viabilidad miocárdica en el síndrome coronario crónico

Q4 Medicine REC: CardioClinics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rccl.2024.09.003
Luis Carlos Maestre-Luque , Rafael González-Manzanares , Clara Fernández-Cordón , Felipe Díez-Delhoyo
{"title":"Controversias en la revascularización y el estudio de viabilidad miocárdica en el síndrome coronario crónico","authors":"Luis Carlos Maestre-Luque ,&nbsp;Rafael González-Manzanares ,&nbsp;Clara Fernández-Cordón ,&nbsp;Felipe Díez-Delhoyo","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The broad spectrum of patients with chronic coronary syndrome and the controversies in diagnosis and treatment pose a major challenge in clinical decision making. Concerning the diagnosis, the utility of myocardial viability study has been questioned by recent clinical trials. Regarding the therapeutic approach, in patients with simple coronary disease, percutaneous revascularization has proved its utility in anginal symptoms relieve, but the evidence regarding a prognostic benefit is contradictory. In complex coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting surgery has reported better results than percutaneous intervention. Besides, surgical revascularization has demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events over medical treatment in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. In this review we critically analyse the current evidence on viability study and myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 12-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153224001110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The broad spectrum of patients with chronic coronary syndrome and the controversies in diagnosis and treatment pose a major challenge in clinical decision making. Concerning the diagnosis, the utility of myocardial viability study has been questioned by recent clinical trials. Regarding the therapeutic approach, in patients with simple coronary disease, percutaneous revascularization has proved its utility in anginal symptoms relieve, but the evidence regarding a prognostic benefit is contradictory. In complex coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting surgery has reported better results than percutaneous intervention. Besides, surgical revascularization has demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events over medical treatment in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. In this review we critically analyse the current evidence on viability study and myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REC: CardioClinics
REC: CardioClinics Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Leiomiomatosis intravenosa con extensión intracardiaca y a la arteria pulmonar Hipertensión pulmonar por posible enfermedad relacionada con IgG4 Frecuencia y distribución geográfica de la prescripción de inhibidores de PCSK9 en Colombia entre 2019 y 2021 Indicación potencialmente alta de semaglutida en prevención secundaria en una región con alta prevalencia de obesidad Perforación coronaria espontánea complicada con un hemotórax masivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1