Innovation and zombie firms: Empirical evidence from Italy

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105172
Andrea Ascani , Lakshmi Balachandran Nair
{"title":"Innovation and zombie firms: Empirical evidence from Italy","authors":"Andrea Ascani ,&nbsp;Lakshmi Balachandran Nair","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Zombie firms are businesses that cannot repay debt from current profits over an extended period and yet continue to operate and avoid failure. This article specifically investigates whether and under what circumstances the presence of zombies in an industry constitutes a barrier to the innovativeness of non-zombies in the same sector. Conceptually, non-zombie firms may face tougher access to finance and fiercer market competition when zombies are in business, and this could reduce their innovative efforts. By analysing matched patent-firm data from Bureau van Dijk ORBIS Intellectual Property on 426,130 Italian firms from 2012 to 2018, we find evidence in favour of this negative intra-industry spillover. Nonetheless, this general relationship is subject to various contingencies. Specifically, zombies are detrimental to healthy firms that (i) depend on external sources of finance, (ii) operate in highly competitive markets, (iii) are more exposed to the erosion of their market shares, and (iv) do not possess a pre-existing strong knowledge base. Our findings have relevant policy and managerial implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 3","pages":"Article 105172"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325000010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zombie firms are businesses that cannot repay debt from current profits over an extended period and yet continue to operate and avoid failure. This article specifically investigates whether and under what circumstances the presence of zombies in an industry constitutes a barrier to the innovativeness of non-zombies in the same sector. Conceptually, non-zombie firms may face tougher access to finance and fiercer market competition when zombies are in business, and this could reduce their innovative efforts. By analysing matched patent-firm data from Bureau van Dijk ORBIS Intellectual Property on 426,130 Italian firms from 2012 to 2018, we find evidence in favour of this negative intra-industry spillover. Nonetheless, this general relationship is subject to various contingencies. Specifically, zombies are detrimental to healthy firms that (i) depend on external sources of finance, (ii) operate in highly competitive markets, (iii) are more exposed to the erosion of their market shares, and (iv) do not possess a pre-existing strong knowledge base. Our findings have relevant policy and managerial implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新与僵尸企业:来自意大利的经验证据
僵尸企业是指在很长一段时间内无法用当期利润偿还债务,但仍能继续运营并避免倒闭的企业。本文专门研究了在何种情况下,一个行业中的僵尸企业是否会阻碍非僵尸企业的创新。从概念上讲,当僵尸企业存在时,非僵尸企业可能面临更困难的融资渠道和更激烈的市场竞争,这可能会减少它们的创新努力。通过分析2012年至2018年van Dijk ORBIS知识产权局对426,130家意大利公司的匹配专利企业数据,我们发现了支持这种负面行业内溢出效应的证据。然而,这种一般关系受到各种偶然事件的影响。具体而言,僵尸企业不利于健康的企业(一)依赖外部资金来源,(二)在竞争激烈的市场中经营,(三)市场份额更容易受到侵蚀,以及(四)不具备预先存在的强大知识基础。我们的研究结果具有相关的政策和管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Institutional and capability enablers of firm-level emissions abatement under the EU Emissions Trading System Non-technological strategic alliances and public support for innovation: What are, if any, their links? Editorial Board The evolution of decentralized exchange: Risks, benefits, and oversight Do weak intellectual property rights regimes affect foreign multinational firms' technology exploration? The moderating role of function-related and location-related experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1