The “conflict avoidance theory of inflammation-induced anxiety” (CATIA): A psychoneuroimmunologic hypothesis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Medical hypotheses Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111580
P.A. Nelles , N. Singewald , B. Sperner-Unterweger , K. Hüfner
{"title":"The “conflict avoidance theory of inflammation-induced anxiety” (CATIA): A psychoneuroimmunologic hypothesis","authors":"P.A. Nelles ,&nbsp;N. Singewald ,&nbsp;B. Sperner-Unterweger ,&nbsp;K. Hüfner","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anxiety and inflammation are complex, interconnected physiological processes. The “Conflict Avoidance Theory of Inflammation-Induced Anxiety” (CATIA) hypothesizes that inflammation-induced anxiety confers an evolutionary advantage by promoting harm-avoidance and recovery-promoting behaviour. Inflammatory cytokines act as signalling molecules to anxiety-related brain regions, primarily limbic structures such as the amygdala, thus influencing decision-making and behaviour. This is archieved by priming these structures for exaggerated fear-responses counteracting conflict engagement, when adaptive physiological readiness is impaired.</div><div>This adaptive mechanism prioritizes recovery and survival during illness or injury. However, in modern contexts, inflammation driven by lifestyle factors or chronic conditions may perpetuate anxiety symptoms, contributing to psychiatric disorders like generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Understanding the psychoneuroimmunologic underpinnings of CATIA may inform screening, prevention, and treatment strategies for anxiety-associated disorders.</div><div>Therefore, we propose clinical applications particularly for clearly defined vulnerable populations affected by inflammation-induced anxiety. These vulnerable populations could be detected using a “screening &amp; scoring system”, and personalized treatment options could then be applied according to a defined algorithm. Although the literature widely supports the theoretical background of CATIA, the hypothesis is thus far untested and needs further investigation. We outline specific suggestions how this could be achieved in a clinical context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 111580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987725000192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anxiety and inflammation are complex, interconnected physiological processes. The “Conflict Avoidance Theory of Inflammation-Induced Anxiety” (CATIA) hypothesizes that inflammation-induced anxiety confers an evolutionary advantage by promoting harm-avoidance and recovery-promoting behaviour. Inflammatory cytokines act as signalling molecules to anxiety-related brain regions, primarily limbic structures such as the amygdala, thus influencing decision-making and behaviour. This is archieved by priming these structures for exaggerated fear-responses counteracting conflict engagement, when adaptive physiological readiness is impaired.
This adaptive mechanism prioritizes recovery and survival during illness or injury. However, in modern contexts, inflammation driven by lifestyle factors or chronic conditions may perpetuate anxiety symptoms, contributing to psychiatric disorders like generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Understanding the psychoneuroimmunologic underpinnings of CATIA may inform screening, prevention, and treatment strategies for anxiety-associated disorders.
Therefore, we propose clinical applications particularly for clearly defined vulnerable populations affected by inflammation-induced anxiety. These vulnerable populations could be detected using a “screening & scoring system”, and personalized treatment options could then be applied according to a defined algorithm. Although the literature widely supports the theoretical background of CATIA, the hypothesis is thus far untested and needs further investigation. We outline specific suggestions how this could be achieved in a clinical context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical hypotheses
Medical hypotheses 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
167
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exploring dual applications of gliptins: A potential host-targeted strategy for diabetes and COVID-19 co-morbidity Circadian rhythm as a key target for endogenous testosterone restoration in aging men Correspondence to ’A quantum mechanical explanation for auditory-visual hallucinations by Liam Greenacre’ Using the V127 prion variant for prion disease gene therapy: A hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1