Multimode residual monitoring of particle concentration in flue gas from Fluid Catalytic Cracking regenerator

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Control Engineering Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106227
Chunmeng Zhu , Nan Liu , Mengxuan Zhang , Zeng Li , Yuhui Li , Xiaogang Shi , Xingying Lan
{"title":"Multimode residual monitoring of particle concentration in flue gas from Fluid Catalytic Cracking regenerator","authors":"Chunmeng Zhu ,&nbsp;Nan Liu ,&nbsp;Mengxuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Zeng Li ,&nbsp;Yuhui Li ,&nbsp;Xiaogang Shi ,&nbsp;Xingying Lan","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reactor-regenerator system Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) highly relies on stable catalyst cycling. However, the FCC unit usually operates in multiple modes to accommodate feedstock properties, catalyst characteristics, and variations in operating parameters. Multiple operating modes exhibit different flow and separation performances within the unit, resulting in different statistical characteristics of the particle size distribution and the amount of catalyst loss under normal conditions. It brings significant challenges for process monitoring methods to accurately predict catalyst loss for multiple modes and to enhance distinguishability between transition and anomaly modes due to complex non-stationary characteristics. In this work, a Multimode Fusion Residual monitoring model using the Long Short-Term Memory encoder–decoder (MFR-LSTM) is proposed to analyze the catalyst loss in a 2.8 million t/a FCC unit. The MFR-LSTM integrates a multimode prediction module and an adaptive attention module to extract mode-specific characteristics and temporal dependencies across modes to approximate the first principles of physical/chemical relationships among different features under normal catalyst loss status. In addition, it captures the evolution from normal to fault conditions by monitoring residual variations with an adaptive threshold. Results show that the MFR-LSTM model outperforms the single model in both the stable and transition modes, with an improvement in the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of approximately 20% and 15%, respectively, demonstrating acceptable stability performance. Furthermore, the generalization performance of the model is confirmed with multiple particle size distribution in different modes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 106227"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124003861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reactor-regenerator system Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) highly relies on stable catalyst cycling. However, the FCC unit usually operates in multiple modes to accommodate feedstock properties, catalyst characteristics, and variations in operating parameters. Multiple operating modes exhibit different flow and separation performances within the unit, resulting in different statistical characteristics of the particle size distribution and the amount of catalyst loss under normal conditions. It brings significant challenges for process monitoring methods to accurately predict catalyst loss for multiple modes and to enhance distinguishability between transition and anomaly modes due to complex non-stationary characteristics. In this work, a Multimode Fusion Residual monitoring model using the Long Short-Term Memory encoder–decoder (MFR-LSTM) is proposed to analyze the catalyst loss in a 2.8 million t/a FCC unit. The MFR-LSTM integrates a multimode prediction module and an adaptive attention module to extract mode-specific characteristics and temporal dependencies across modes to approximate the first principles of physical/chemical relationships among different features under normal catalyst loss status. In addition, it captures the evolution from normal to fault conditions by monitoring residual variations with an adaptive threshold. Results show that the MFR-LSTM model outperforms the single model in both the stable and transition modes, with an improvement in the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of approximately 20% and 15%, respectively, demonstrating acceptable stability performance. Furthermore, the generalization performance of the model is confirmed with multiple particle size distribution in different modes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流体催化裂化再生器烟气中颗粒残留浓度的多模式监测
反应器-蓄热系统的催化裂化高度依赖于稳定的催化剂循环。然而,FCC装置通常在多种模式下运行,以适应原料特性、催化剂特性和操作参数的变化。不同的操作模式在装置内部表现出不同的流动和分离性能,导致正常情况下的粒度分布和催化剂损失量的统计特征不同。由于复杂的非平稳特性,如何准确预测多种模式的催化剂损失,以及如何提高过渡模式和异常模式之间的区别,给过程监测方法带来了重大挑战。本文提出了一种基于长短期记忆编码器(MFR-LSTM)的多模融合残留监测模型,用于分析280万t/a催化裂化装置的催化剂损耗。MFR-LSTM集成了一个多模式预测模块和一个自适应关注模块,以提取模式特定的特征和模式间的时间依赖性,以近似在正常催化剂损失状态下不同特征之间的物理/化学关系的第一原则。此外,它通过监测残差变化和自适应阈值来捕获从正常状态到故障状态的演变。结果表明,MFR-LSTM模型在稳定模式和过渡模式下均优于单一模型,均方根误差(RMSE)分别提高了约20%和15%,具有可接受的稳定性性能。此外,在不同模式下的多个粒径分布情况下,验证了该模型的泛化性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Control Engineering Practice
Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
12.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fixed-time sliding mode tracking control of a remotely operated vehicle based on fully actuated system theory Pre-Shift fill control of wet clutches in heavy tracked vehicles using velocity prediction and a model predictive control framework Safe reinforcement learning framework for high-obstacle climbing in heavy wheeled-legged robots Prior knowledge-augmented sparse wavelet spatio-temporal graph network for anomaly detection of electric submersible pumps Horizon-one model-predictive control with stability guarantee for a permanent magnet synchronous motor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1