Reforming plastic packaging regulation: Outcomes from stakeholder interviews and regulatory analysis

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.017
Hope Johnson , Katherine Keane , Laura McGillivray , Afshin Akhtar-Khavari , Lewis Chambers , Christopher Barner-Kowollik , Mark Lauchs , James Blinco
{"title":"Reforming plastic packaging regulation: Outcomes from stakeholder interviews and regulatory analysis","authors":"Hope Johnson ,&nbsp;Katherine Keane ,&nbsp;Laura McGillivray ,&nbsp;Afshin Akhtar-Khavari ,&nbsp;Lewis Chambers ,&nbsp;Christopher Barner-Kowollik ,&nbsp;Mark Lauchs ,&nbsp;James Blinco","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regulators worldwide are considering how to significantly improve the regulation of plastic packaging in response to the world's plastic pollution crisis and the future UN treaty on plastics. In Australia, where plastic packaging regulations have remained largely unchanged for over two decades, the government now aims to introduce comprehensive reforms. This study, which brings together a team of chemists and lawyers, seeks to understand the key reform options and the ways in which these interventions should be designed to ensure accountability and sustainability and avoid unintended consequences. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with twenty-six (26) stakeholders within the plastic packaging sector from leading government, industry and civil society bodies. A qualitative analysis was conducted of the interviews to identify common ground among stakeholders regarding reform options and to develop an understanding of the various issues regulators would need to consider when developing new regulations for plastic packaging. This qualitative component was interlinked to a regulatory analysis of both the broad trends in laws and policies for plastic packaging worldwide and Australia's existing regulatory responses to plastic packaging. Results show that stakeholders commonly agree on several regulatory interventions, but that each intervention brings a host of complexities within the current system that regulators will need to address to ensure success. This paper's findings are valuable for actors seeking to improve plastic packaging regulation within their own jurisdiction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 52-63"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003609","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulators worldwide are considering how to significantly improve the regulation of plastic packaging in response to the world's plastic pollution crisis and the future UN treaty on plastics. In Australia, where plastic packaging regulations have remained largely unchanged for over two decades, the government now aims to introduce comprehensive reforms. This study, which brings together a team of chemists and lawyers, seeks to understand the key reform options and the ways in which these interventions should be designed to ensure accountability and sustainability and avoid unintended consequences. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with twenty-six (26) stakeholders within the plastic packaging sector from leading government, industry and civil society bodies. A qualitative analysis was conducted of the interviews to identify common ground among stakeholders regarding reform options and to develop an understanding of the various issues regulators would need to consider when developing new regulations for plastic packaging. This qualitative component was interlinked to a regulatory analysis of both the broad trends in laws and policies for plastic packaging worldwide and Australia's existing regulatory responses to plastic packaging. Results show that stakeholders commonly agree on several regulatory interventions, but that each intervention brings a host of complexities within the current system that regulators will need to address to ensure success. This paper's findings are valuable for actors seeking to improve plastic packaging regulation within their own jurisdiction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改革塑料包装法规:利益相关者访谈和监管分析的结果
世界各地的监管机构正在考虑如何显著改善塑料包装的监管,以应对世界塑料污染危机和未来的联合国塑料条约。在澳大利亚,塑料包装法规20多年来基本保持不变,政府现在的目标是引入全面的改革。这项研究汇集了一个由化学家和律师组成的团队,旨在了解关键的改革方案以及这些干预措施的设计方式,以确保问责制和可持续性,并避免意想不到的后果。与来自主要政府、工业和民间社会机构的塑料包装部门的二十六(26)名利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈进行了定性分析,以确定利益相关者之间关于改革方案的共同点,并了解监管机构在制定塑料包装新法规时需要考虑的各种问题。这一定性组成部分与对全球塑料包装法律和政策的广泛趋势以及澳大利亚对塑料包装的现有监管反应的监管分析相互关联。结果表明,利益相关者普遍同意几种监管干预措施,但每种干预措施都会给当前系统带来许多复杂性,监管机构需要解决这些复杂性以确保成功。本文的研究结果对于寻求在自己的管辖范围内改善塑料包装监管的行为者是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
Trade-off or synergy: How is the carbon footprint of agricultural food products linked to other environmental impacts? Environmental life cycle assessment of novel PV systems for desert conditions A dynamic social-life cycle assessment based framework for social risk assessment Resource efficiency for closed-loop circularity of building insulation materials in Europe “Made in Germany”? Labour, wages and carbon footprints of consumption and production of the motor vehicles industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1