Post-growth economics as a guide for systemic change: Theoretical and methodological foundations

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108521
Elena Hofferberth
{"title":"Post-growth economics as a guide for systemic change: Theoretical and methodological foundations","authors":"Elena Hofferberth","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing contemporary social-ecological crises requires systemic change. Post-Growth Economics (PGE) has emerged as a paradigm to address this challenge. To strengthen the theoretical and methodological foundations of PGE and overcome some of the cleavages between Marxist (and other) analyses and critiques of capitalism and De-/Post-Growth, this article develops a theoretical framework of 21<sup>st</sup> century capitalism and elaborates on the implications for De-/Post-Growth. For that purpose, it synthesises insights from within and outside PGE, drawing on heterodox schools of economic thought whose potential has so far not been fully harnessed by PGE scholars, most notably Marxist Political Economy. One central result is that the renunciation of economic growth and the reorientation of the economy towards sustainability and wellbeing necessitate a deeper transformation of the social relations of capitalism. Breaking the system's growth dependence requires the dissolution of the system's dependence on profit, wage labour, the private ownership and unequal distribution of essential resources, and money as universal equivalent. It means reconfiguring interhuman relations and relations to non-human nature. To offer transformative solutions at the current historical juncture, PGE would benefit from accounting more comprehensively for the distinct challenges arising from capitalism's contemporary forms, particularly financialisation and increasing rentierism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 108521"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addressing contemporary social-ecological crises requires systemic change. Post-Growth Economics (PGE) has emerged as a paradigm to address this challenge. To strengthen the theoretical and methodological foundations of PGE and overcome some of the cleavages between Marxist (and other) analyses and critiques of capitalism and De-/Post-Growth, this article develops a theoretical framework of 21st century capitalism and elaborates on the implications for De-/Post-Growth. For that purpose, it synthesises insights from within and outside PGE, drawing on heterodox schools of economic thought whose potential has so far not been fully harnessed by PGE scholars, most notably Marxist Political Economy. One central result is that the renunciation of economic growth and the reorientation of the economy towards sustainability and wellbeing necessitate a deeper transformation of the social relations of capitalism. Breaking the system's growth dependence requires the dissolution of the system's dependence on profit, wage labour, the private ownership and unequal distribution of essential resources, and money as universal equivalent. It means reconfiguring interhuman relations and relations to non-human nature. To offer transformative solutions at the current historical juncture, PGE would benefit from accounting more comprehensively for the distinct challenges arising from capitalism's contemporary forms, particularly financialisation and increasing rentierism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后增长经济学作为系统性变革的指南:理论和方法基础
解决当代社会生态危机需要系统性变革。后增长经济学(PGE)已经成为解决这一挑战的范式。为了加强PGE的理论和方法基础,并克服马克思主义(和其他)对资本主义和去增长/后增长的分析和批评之间的一些分歧,本文发展了21世纪资本主义的理论框架,并详细阐述了去增长/后增长的含义。为此,它综合了PGE内部和外部的见解,借鉴了非正统的经济思想流派,这些学派的潜力迄今尚未被PGE学者充分利用,最著名的是马克思主义政治经济学。一个核心结果是,放弃经济增长和将经济重新定位于可持续性和福祉,需要对资本主义的社会关系进行更深层次的转变。打破这一制度对增长的依赖,需要打破这一制度对利润、雇佣劳动、私有制和基本资源的不平等分配以及作为普遍等价物的货币的依赖。它意味着重新配置人与人之间的关系以及与非人性的关系。为了在当前的历史关头提供变革性的解决方案,PGE将受益于更全面地考虑资本主义当代形式所带来的独特挑战,尤其是金融化和日益加剧的食利化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Managing shade trees, balancing trade-offs: Effects of shade-tree density on economic performance of Brazilian cocoa agroforests GDP alternatives revisited: A systematic review and thematic analysis of barriers to the adoption of alternative measures of economic progress Beyond the chain: Lead firm strategies and sustainability governance in the global coffee sector Corrigendum to ‘Integrating post-growth economics into transformative adaptation: Property relations, capital, and democratic planning’ [Ecological Economics (2026) Volume 242 108895] Shades of green behaviour under heterogeneous subjective risk and social domains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1