Multitasking Moose Migration: Examining media multimodality in slow-TV nature programming

IF 4.7 Telematics and Informatics Reports Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.teler.2025.100186
Erica von Essen , Minh-Xuan A. Truong
{"title":"Multitasking Moose Migration: Examining media multimodality in slow-TV nature programming","authors":"Erica von Essen ,&nbsp;Minh-Xuan A. Truong","doi":"10.1016/j.teler.2025.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Media multitasking has become an integrated part of much media consumption. While some celebrate the practice for activating the viewer and connecting them to virtual others, perhaps discussing the show in real-time, critics point to cognitive costs and reduced productivity. A perhaps more scathing critique has been added to those multitasking while watching nature documentaries: you are already consuming nature through a screen, but now your focus is further fragmented across multiple apps. The implication is that this is not an authentic way of experiencing nature, at a time—the Digital Anthropocene—when direct nature experiences dwindle. In this study, we examine viewers’ engagement with different sorts of media and ‘real-life’, physical multitasking during a slow-TV nature documentary, The Great Moose Migration in Sweden. We ask what these tasks mean not only for one's enjoyment and relaxation, but more broadly for nature engagement in the Digital Anthropocene, and connection to others over nature as something shared. Through surveys and digital ethnography of the Great Moose Migration, our research shows how multitasking around nature contributes to a potentially transformative experience. It is a viewer experience that is at once personal through increased customization options and layering of different activities. Second, it is communal in terms of connecting diverse audiences on platforms. Our contribution is in showing that taskscapes are now becoming multi-taskscapes, which comprise both physical and digital tasks over nature. These multi-taskscapes are actively shaped by users who engage with them. This changes both the media landscape and the way we engage with nature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101213,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503025000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Media multitasking has become an integrated part of much media consumption. While some celebrate the practice for activating the viewer and connecting them to virtual others, perhaps discussing the show in real-time, critics point to cognitive costs and reduced productivity. A perhaps more scathing critique has been added to those multitasking while watching nature documentaries: you are already consuming nature through a screen, but now your focus is further fragmented across multiple apps. The implication is that this is not an authentic way of experiencing nature, at a time—the Digital Anthropocene—when direct nature experiences dwindle. In this study, we examine viewers’ engagement with different sorts of media and ‘real-life’, physical multitasking during a slow-TV nature documentary, The Great Moose Migration in Sweden. We ask what these tasks mean not only for one's enjoyment and relaxation, but more broadly for nature engagement in the Digital Anthropocene, and connection to others over nature as something shared. Through surveys and digital ethnography of the Great Moose Migration, our research shows how multitasking around nature contributes to a potentially transformative experience. It is a viewer experience that is at once personal through increased customization options and layering of different activities. Second, it is communal in terms of connecting diverse audiences on platforms. Our contribution is in showing that taskscapes are now becoming multi-taskscapes, which comprise both physical and digital tasks over nature. These multi-taskscapes are actively shaped by users who engage with them. This changes both the media landscape and the way we engage with nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多任务驼鹿迁移:在慢电视自然节目中检验媒体多模态
媒体多任务处理已经成为许多媒体消费的一个组成部分。虽然有些人称赞这种做法可以激活观众并将他们与虚拟的其他人联系起来,也许可以实时讨论节目,但批评者指出了认知成本和降低的生产力。在观看自然纪录片的同时进行多任务处理,可能会有更严厉的批评:你已经在通过屏幕消费自然,但现在你的注意力进一步分散在多个应用程序上。这意味着,在一个直接的自然体验减少的时代——数字人类世——这不是一种体验自然的真实方式。在这项研究中,我们研究了在慢速电视自然纪录片《瑞典驼鹿大迁徙》中,观众对不同类型媒体和“现实生活”的多任务处理的参与情况。我们要问的是,这些任务不仅对一个人的享受和放松意味着什么,而且更广泛地说,对数字人类世中的自然参与意味着什么,以及与他人之间的联系意味着什么。通过对驼鹿大迁徙的调查和数字人种学,我们的研究表明,围绕大自然的多任务处理如何有助于实现潜在的变革体验。这是一种通过增加自定义选项和不同活动分层而立即个性化的观看体验。其次,它是公共的,因为它连接了平台上不同的受众。我们的贡献在于展示了任务场景现在正在变成多任务场景,其中包括自然的物理和数字任务。这些多任务场景是由参与其中的用户积极塑造的。这既改变了媒体的格局,也改变了我们与自然接触的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Umbrella place branding in the digital era: Mutualities and externalities among local stakeholders KG-DNA: Knowledge graphs as network DNA for purpose-preserving intelligence in autonomous 6G networks FedDrive-Sec: A blockchain-assisted federated deep reinforcement learning framework for secure and adaptive internet of vehicles Reconciling cultural values with algorithmic profiling through Kenya’s data protection lens: A conceptual framework for inferential privacy The role of cybersecurity and trust on customers’ continuous usage of mobile money in Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1