Breath- and blood-based molecular assessment for gastroesophageal cancer

S. Vanstraelen , F. Van Herpe , J. Dekervel , P. Nafteux
{"title":"Breath- and blood-based molecular assessment for gastroesophageal cancer","authors":"S. Vanstraelen ,&nbsp;F. Van Herpe ,&nbsp;J. Dekervel ,&nbsp;P. Nafteux","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gastroesophageal cancer remains a significant health care problem characterized by diagnosis at advanced stages, rendering a significant proportion of patients ineligible for curative treatment. Conversely, early diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal cancer demonstrates markedly improved outcomes, with 5-year overall survival rates ranging from 83% to 96%. To date, gastroesophageal cancer surveillance primarily focuses on patients with Barrett’s esophagus, relying on invasive upper endoscopy. However, despite its high specificity, upper endoscopy demonstrates a suboptimal cancer yield and moderate missed rates, compromising its cost-effectiveness for screening in the general population. Moreover, screening strategies for gastroesophageal cancer are still lacking, in part owing to the invasiveness of current diagnostic methods.</div><div>To overcome these challenges, innovative minimally invasive technologies have emerged, including metabolomics of exhaled breath, and detection of circulating tumor DNA or proteomics in blood. Promising results from phase I diagnostic trials emphasize the potential of these approaches to advance early detection and monitoring of gastroesophageal cancer. As these methods further refine and consistently demonstrate adequate sensitivity and specificity, they are poised to challenge existing diagnostic modalities. This progress may prompt reconsideration of current one-size-fits-all paradigms, facilitating the evolution toward a patient-tailored management of gastroesophageal cancer.</div><div>In this article, we review the current minimally invasive breath- and blood-based diagnostic approaches for gastroesophageal cancer, elucidating the underlying biologic basis of identifiable biomarkers. As these approaches will become an integral part of future diagnostic paradigms, understanding the operational mechanisms, strengths, and limitations of these approaches is crucial for optimizing their implementation and interpretability in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819825000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastroesophageal cancer remains a significant health care problem characterized by diagnosis at advanced stages, rendering a significant proportion of patients ineligible for curative treatment. Conversely, early diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal cancer demonstrates markedly improved outcomes, with 5-year overall survival rates ranging from 83% to 96%. To date, gastroesophageal cancer surveillance primarily focuses on patients with Barrett’s esophagus, relying on invasive upper endoscopy. However, despite its high specificity, upper endoscopy demonstrates a suboptimal cancer yield and moderate missed rates, compromising its cost-effectiveness for screening in the general population. Moreover, screening strategies for gastroesophageal cancer are still lacking, in part owing to the invasiveness of current diagnostic methods.
To overcome these challenges, innovative minimally invasive technologies have emerged, including metabolomics of exhaled breath, and detection of circulating tumor DNA or proteomics in blood. Promising results from phase I diagnostic trials emphasize the potential of these approaches to advance early detection and monitoring of gastroesophageal cancer. As these methods further refine and consistently demonstrate adequate sensitivity and specificity, they are poised to challenge existing diagnostic modalities. This progress may prompt reconsideration of current one-size-fits-all paradigms, facilitating the evolution toward a patient-tailored management of gastroesophageal cancer.
In this article, we review the current minimally invasive breath- and blood-based diagnostic approaches for gastroesophageal cancer, elucidating the underlying biologic basis of identifiable biomarkers. As these approaches will become an integral part of future diagnostic paradigms, understanding the operational mechanisms, strengths, and limitations of these approaches is crucial for optimizing their implementation and interpretability in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CD147-expressed small extracellular vesicles enhance the detection of colorectal neoplasia with fecal immunochemical test Molecular analysis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real-world study from high-volume French centres (CAPANCOBIO study) A stratified two-stage tumor molecular profiling algorithm to identify clinically actionable molecular alterations in pancreatic cancer☆ Virtual reality support during systemic cancer therapy to improve anxiety/depressive symptoms and reduce toxicity in patients with gastrointestinal cancers—OncoVR Development and characterization of orthotopic patient-derived xenograft models of peritoneal metastatic mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1