Effectiveness of chain of survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries: A systematic review

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100874
Mirza Noor Ali Baig , Zafar Fatmi , Nadeem Ullah Khan , Uzma Rahim Khan , Ahmed Raheem , Junaid Abdul Razzak
{"title":"Effectiveness of chain of survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries: A systematic review","authors":"Mirza Noor Ali Baig ,&nbsp;Zafar Fatmi ,&nbsp;Nadeem Ullah Khan ,&nbsp;Uzma Rahim Khan ,&nbsp;Ahmed Raheem ,&nbsp;Junaid Abdul Razzak","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Given the critical disparities in survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries and the lack of context-specific evidence to guide resuscitation practices, we aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the chain of survival components including bystander response, emergency medical services (EMS) response, advanced life support, and post-resuscitation care on outcomes such as return of spontaneous circulation, survival to admission, survival to hospital discharge, and neurological outcomes in these settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, included observational and interventional studies on OHCA management from low, lower-middle, and upper-middle-income countries, published in English (2004–2023). PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched using predefined terms. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data using the Utstein template, and resolved conflicts with a third reviewer. Data included pre-hospital, patient, and post-resuscitation care factors, as well as short and long-term outcomes. Descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis were conducted, with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates compared across income groups using <em>t</em>-tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen (16) eligible studies were included. No study was found from low-income countries. ROSC rates ranged from 0.7% to 44%, survival to discharge from 0.6% to 14.1%, and good neurological outcomes (CPC 1–2) from 0.6% to 53.8%. While upper-middle-income countries showed slightly higher ROSC rates, differences were not statistically significant. Risk of bias was moderate to high due to selection bias, inadequate confounding control, and inconsistent reporting. These findings emphasize the need for standardized reporting and further research to improve outcomes in resource limited countries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review highlights low survival rates for OHCA in resource limited countries, with significant variability and gaps in evidence. Strengthening EMS systems, adopting context-specific strategies, and standardizing reporting are critical to improving outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Given the critical disparities in survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries and the lack of context-specific evidence to guide resuscitation practices, we aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the chain of survival components including bystander response, emergency medical services (EMS) response, advanced life support, and post-resuscitation care on outcomes such as return of spontaneous circulation, survival to admission, survival to hospital discharge, and neurological outcomes in these settings.

Methods

This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, included observational and interventional studies on OHCA management from low, lower-middle, and upper-middle-income countries, published in English (2004–2023). PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched using predefined terms. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data using the Utstein template, and resolved conflicts with a third reviewer. Data included pre-hospital, patient, and post-resuscitation care factors, as well as short and long-term outcomes. Descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis were conducted, with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates compared across income groups using t-tests.

Results

Sixteen (16) eligible studies were included. No study was found from low-income countries. ROSC rates ranged from 0.7% to 44%, survival to discharge from 0.6% to 14.1%, and good neurological outcomes (CPC 1–2) from 0.6% to 53.8%. While upper-middle-income countries showed slightly higher ROSC rates, differences were not statistically significant. Risk of bias was moderate to high due to selection bias, inadequate confounding control, and inconsistent reporting. These findings emphasize the need for standardized reporting and further research to improve outcomes in resource limited countries.

Conclusion

This review highlights low survival rates for OHCA in resource limited countries, with significant variability and gaps in evidence. Strengthening EMS systems, adopting context-specific strategies, and standardizing reporting are critical to improving outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资源有限国家院外心脏骤停(OHCA)生存链的有效性:一项系统评价
考虑到在资源有限的国家,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的存活率存在严重差异,并且缺乏具体情况的证据来指导复苏实践,我们旨在系统地评估生存组成部分链的有效性,包括旁观者反应、紧急医疗服务(EMS)反应、高级生命支持和复苏后护理对自然循环恢复、存活到入院等结果的影响。存活至出院,以及这些情况下的神经预后。方法本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南,纳入了2004-2023年发表的中低收入和中低收入国家OHCA管理的观察性和干预性研究。PubMed, Embase, CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆使用预定义的术语进行检索。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,使用Utstein模板提取数据,并与第三位审稿人解决冲突。数据包括院前、患者和复苏后护理因素,以及短期和长期结果。进行了描述性分析和叙事综合,使用t检验比较了不同收入群体的自发循环回报率(ROSC)。结果纳入16项符合条件的研究。没有发现来自低收入国家的研究。ROSC率为0.7% - 44%,生存率为0.6% - 14.1%,良好的神经预后(CPC 1-2)为0.6% - 53.8%。虽然中高收入国家的ROSC率略高,但差异在统计上并不显著。由于选择偏倚、混淆控制不充分和报告不一致,偏倚风险为中等至高。这些发现强调了标准化报告和进一步研究的必要性,以改善资源有限国家的结果。结论:本综述强调,在资源有限的国家,OHCA的生存率较低,证据存在显著差异和差距。加强环境管理体系、采取针对具体情况的战略和标准化报告对改善结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Transthoracic echocardiography is superior to AHA guidelines location in identifying the left ventricle for chest compressions Ventilatory parameters during emergency department–based CPR and exploratory associations with return of spontaneous circulation Bystanders effect: does environment affect the way bystanders react in emergencies? A digital witness for cardiac arrest: are wearables ready for real-world use? First automated detection of a cardiac arrest using a commercially available smartwatch: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1