Analyzing topographic change profiles in coastal foredune systems: Methodological recommendations

IF 3.1 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geomorphology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109610
Bernard O. Bauer , Jeff Ollerhead , Irene Delgado-Fernandez , Robin G.D. Davidson-Arnott
{"title":"Analyzing topographic change profiles in coastal foredune systems: Methodological recommendations","authors":"Bernard O. Bauer ,&nbsp;Jeff Ollerhead ,&nbsp;Irene Delgado-Fernandez ,&nbsp;Robin G.D. Davidson-Arnott","doi":"10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estimates of total sand volume in foredunes are commonly made for purposes of predicting coastal erosion and inundation potential during major storms, which is of critical importance for resource management and engineering purposes. However, changes in dune volume through time are potentially of greater relevance to process geomorphologists because volume changes are diagnostic of the long-term evolution of beach-dune systems and can be related to drivers of change (e.g., storm climatology, sediment supply, human action). The methods by which dune volume change estimates are made vary widely in the literature because there are no established protocols that provide guidance on the horizontal distances over which volume integration should be performed. In addition, identifying a diagnostic geomorphic feature such as the dune toe as a limit on integration is fraught with subjective uncertainties. In this paper, an objective methodology for quantifying dune volume change directly (rather than absolute volume) is proposed that is simple, intuitive, and robust. The horizontal limits of integration are identified by zero-crossings in the topographic change profiles between two transect surveys taken at different times, and this avoids challenges associated with identification of the dune toe as a fixed profile feature. Instead, the proposed method focuses on locations of morphodynamic significance where there has been a transition from erosion to accretion in the time interval between surveys.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55115,"journal":{"name":"Geomorphology","volume":"472 ","pages":"Article 109610"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomorphology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X25000200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimates of total sand volume in foredunes are commonly made for purposes of predicting coastal erosion and inundation potential during major storms, which is of critical importance for resource management and engineering purposes. However, changes in dune volume through time are potentially of greater relevance to process geomorphologists because volume changes are diagnostic of the long-term evolution of beach-dune systems and can be related to drivers of change (e.g., storm climatology, sediment supply, human action). The methods by which dune volume change estimates are made vary widely in the literature because there are no established protocols that provide guidance on the horizontal distances over which volume integration should be performed. In addition, identifying a diagnostic geomorphic feature such as the dune toe as a limit on integration is fraught with subjective uncertainties. In this paper, an objective methodology for quantifying dune volume change directly (rather than absolute volume) is proposed that is simple, intuitive, and robust. The horizontal limits of integration are identified by zero-crossings in the topographic change profiles between two transect surveys taken at different times, and this avoids challenges associated with identification of the dune toe as a fixed profile feature. Instead, the proposed method focuses on locations of morphodynamic significance where there has been a transition from erosion to accretion in the time interval between surveys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析海岸前丘系统的地形变化概况:方法学建议
预估前沙丘的总沙量通常是为了预测大风暴期间海岸侵蚀和淹没的可能性,这对资源管理和工程目的具有至关重要的意义。然而,沙丘体积随时间的变化可能与过程地貌学有更大的相关性,因为体积变化可以诊断海滩-沙丘系统的长期演变,并可能与变化的驱动因素(例如,风暴气候学、沉积物供应、人类活动)有关。在文献中,估算沙丘体积变化的方法差别很大,因为没有既定的协议来指导应该进行体积积分的水平距离。此外,确定诊断性地貌特征(如沙丘脚趾)作为整合的限制充满了主观的不确定性。本文提出了一种简单、直观、鲁棒的直接量化沙丘体积变化(而非绝对体积)的客观方法。通过在不同时间进行的两次样带调查之间的地形变化剖面中的零交叉来确定整合的水平极限,这避免了将沙丘脚趾识别为固定剖面特征的挑战。相反,所提出的方法侧重于形态动力学意义的位置,在两次调查之间的时间间隔内,这些位置已经从侵蚀过渡到增生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomorphology
Geomorphology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Our journal''s scope includes geomorphic themes of: tectonics and regional structure; glacial processes and landforms; fluvial sequences, Quaternary environmental change and dating; fluvial processes and landforms; mass movement, slopes and periglacial processes; hillslopes and soil erosion; weathering, karst and soils; aeolian processes and landforms, coastal dunes and arid environments; coastal and marine processes, estuaries and lakes; modelling, theoretical and quantitative geomorphology; DEM, GIS and remote sensing methods and applications; hazards, applied and planetary geomorphology; and volcanics.
期刊最新文献
Advantages of integrated geophysical, sedimentary, and dating approaches for reconstructing Holocene tidal inlet evolution: A case study from offshore the Belgian coastal plain Collapsing mountains: Where's next and how to avoid future disasters? CenterNet-GCA: An improved deep learning model for automated identification of gravel clusters in gravel-bed rivers Glacial cirques in the Aras Mountains, Southern Lesser Caucasus, Eastern Türkiye: Morphometry and controlling factors The role of intertidal slope in controlling swash bar characteristics and dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1