Framing locally led adaptation in a planned relocation in Fiji

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104196
Merewalesi Yee , Annah Piggott-McKellar , Celia McMichael , Karen E McNamara
{"title":"Framing locally led adaptation in a planned relocation in Fiji","authors":"Merewalesi Yee ,&nbsp;Annah Piggott-McKellar ,&nbsp;Celia McMichael ,&nbsp;Karen E McNamara","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Locally led adaptation (LLA) is a new paradigm that seeks to ensure that adaptation decision-making is driven by local people affected by climate risks to deliver context-specific and equitable solutions for local communities. LLA proposes a meaningful approach to decision-making about how, when, and where to adapt; however, there are several challenges associated with LLA including complex power dynamics at the local scale. Empirical research is needed to examine how to best utilise and put in practice LLA principles and processes for improved outcomes on-the-ground. This paper reports on findings from research undertaken in Cogea, Fiji, which is a village that planned to relocate following the destructive category 5 Tropical Cyclone (TC) Yasa and associated flooding in December 2020. This paper draws from <em>Talanoa</em> discussions with small groups and individuals and participant observation in December 2021 and January 2023, to contextualise experiences of the planned relocation process in the context of the eight principles of LLA: devolved decision-making, responsiveness to structural inequalities, reliable funding, investment in local capabilities, robust understanding of climate risk, flexible programming, transparency and accountability, and collaborative action and investment. As this paper explores, Cogea’s relocation was aligned, either strongly or partially, to these LLA principles, albeit with the involvement of donor and development partners in decision-making processes. The paper argues that it is not sufficient to devolve adaptation decision-making to the ‘local’ level; LLA requires ‘critical localism’ that is responsive to vernacular understandings of the local, and the agency of and power dynamics between different actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Locally led adaptation (LLA) is a new paradigm that seeks to ensure that adaptation decision-making is driven by local people affected by climate risks to deliver context-specific and equitable solutions for local communities. LLA proposes a meaningful approach to decision-making about how, when, and where to adapt; however, there are several challenges associated with LLA including complex power dynamics at the local scale. Empirical research is needed to examine how to best utilise and put in practice LLA principles and processes for improved outcomes on-the-ground. This paper reports on findings from research undertaken in Cogea, Fiji, which is a village that planned to relocate following the destructive category 5 Tropical Cyclone (TC) Yasa and associated flooding in December 2020. This paper draws from Talanoa discussions with small groups and individuals and participant observation in December 2021 and January 2023, to contextualise experiences of the planned relocation process in the context of the eight principles of LLA: devolved decision-making, responsiveness to structural inequalities, reliable funding, investment in local capabilities, robust understanding of climate risk, flexible programming, transparency and accountability, and collaborative action and investment. As this paper explores, Cogea’s relocation was aligned, either strongly or partially, to these LLA principles, albeit with the involvement of donor and development partners in decision-making processes. The paper argues that it is not sufficient to devolve adaptation decision-making to the ‘local’ level; LLA requires ‘critical localism’ that is responsive to vernacular understandings of the local, and the agency of and power dynamics between different actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Remaking land–water boundaries in the Rhone plain in Switzerland: A reinterpretation of past and present river training using a ‘postcolonial mirror’ “They’re probably quite used to this idea of us and them”: The racialising assemblage and development discourses in school geography in England Urbanization’s mediator: Reassembling rural tibetan lives through pig breed changes Can wild geese remake a zoo? The promise of more-than-human heterotopia for a politics of living with urban wildlife The ‘Borders of Berlin’: West African protests and the coloniality of Euro-African deportation cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1