Concomitant proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: an ancillary study from the PRODIGE 23 trial

ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100119
M. Bridoux , E. Aymes , T. Conroy , S. Gourgou , A. Carnot , C. Borg , M.-C. Le Deley , A. Turpin
{"title":"Concomitant proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: an ancillary study from the PRODIGE 23 trial","authors":"M. Bridoux ,&nbsp;E. Aymes ,&nbsp;T. Conroy ,&nbsp;S. Gourgou ,&nbsp;A. Carnot ,&nbsp;C. Borg ,&nbsp;M.-C. Le Deley ,&nbsp;A. Turpin","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately one in five cancer patients use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this work, we studied the effect of PPI co-medication during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the phase III PRODIGE 23 trial.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We gathered data on PPI exposure for patients from the PRODIGE 23 trial. PPI exposure was defined as PPI use during capecitabine treatment, either during CRT or as adjuvant therapy. The oncological outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of metastatic recurrence, and pathological response to preoperative treatment. The association of PPI use with RFS, metastatic recurrence, and histological complete response was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed data from 332 patients [165 in the NAC group with mFOLFIRINOX, capecitabine-based (CAP50) CRT, and surgery, and 167 in the standard-of-care control arm with CAP50 CRT and surgery]. Thirty-eight patients were co-administered a PPI during capecitabine administration. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the 3-year RFS rates were 74.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.6% to 78.8%] and 68.4% (95% CI 51.2% to 80.7%) in the non-PPI and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.16). The 3-year OS rates were 91.2% (95% CI 87.2% to 93.9%) and 83% (95% CI 65.7% to 92%) in the non-PPI group and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.38). We observed no difference in the pathological complete response rate between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We observed no significant association between PPI exposure and survival or pathological response of patients receiving capecitabine-based CRT for LARC, supporting earlier research findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Approximately one in five cancer patients use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this work, we studied the effect of PPI co-medication during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the phase III PRODIGE 23 trial.

Materials and methods

We gathered data on PPI exposure for patients from the PRODIGE 23 trial. PPI exposure was defined as PPI use during capecitabine treatment, either during CRT or as adjuvant therapy. The oncological outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of metastatic recurrence, and pathological response to preoperative treatment. The association of PPI use with RFS, metastatic recurrence, and histological complete response was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox models.

Results

We analyzed data from 332 patients [165 in the NAC group with mFOLFIRINOX, capecitabine-based (CAP50) CRT, and surgery, and 167 in the standard-of-care control arm with CAP50 CRT and surgery]. Thirty-eight patients were co-administered a PPI during capecitabine administration. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the 3-year RFS rates were 74.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.6% to 78.8%] and 68.4% (95% CI 51.2% to 80.7%) in the non-PPI and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.16). The 3-year OS rates were 91.2% (95% CI 87.2% to 93.9%) and 83% (95% CI 65.7% to 92%) in the non-PPI group and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.38). We observed no difference in the pathological complete response rate between both groups.

Conclusions

We observed no significant association between PPI exposure and survival or pathological response of patients receiving capecitabine-based CRT for LARC, supporting earlier research findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠癌联合质子泵抑制剂和卡培他滨放化疗:来自PRODIGE 23试验的辅助研究
大约五分之一的癌症患者使用质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)。在这项工作中,我们基于III期PRODIGE 23试验研究了局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)新辅助放化疗(NCRT)期间PPI联合用药的效果。材料和方法我们从PRODIGE 23试验中收集了患者PPI暴露的数据。PPI暴露被定义为在卡培他滨治疗期间使用PPI,无论是在CRT期间还是作为辅助治疗。肿瘤预后包括无复发生存期(RFS)、总生存期(OS)、累积转移性复发发生率和术前治疗的病理反应。使用单变量和多变量Cox模型评估PPI使用与RFS、转移性复发和组织学完全缓解的关系。结果:我们分析了332例患者的数据[165例在NAC组,采用mFOLFIRINOX、卡培他滨(CAP50) CRT和手术,167例在标准护理对照组,采用CAP50 CRT和手术]。38例患者在卡培他滨给药期间联合给予PPI。中位随访49.4个月后,非PPI组和PPI组的3年RFS率分别为74.1%[95%可信区间(CI) 68.6% ~ 78.8%]和68.4% (95% CI 51.2% ~ 80.7%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.16)。非PPI组和PPI组的3年OS分别为91.2% (95% CI 87.2% ~ 93.9%)和83% (95% CI 65.7% ~ 92%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.38)。我们观察到两组的病理完全缓解率无差异。结论:我们观察到PPI暴露与接受卡培他滨为基础的CRT治疗LARC患者的生存或病理反应之间无显著相关性,支持早期研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcomes and management of primary tumors in metastatic MSI/dMMR colorectal cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a cohort study Effectiveness of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab and impact of prior bevacizumab exposure in patients with mCRC: the Italian FLOWER study Additional benefit of standardized computed tomography-based lymph node assessment utilizing Node-RADS in esophageal adenocarcinoma Methodological limitations in interpreting the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan by CLDN18.2 status in single-arm studies Spatial immune profiling complements genomic sequencing in biliary tract cancer: hypothesis-generating use cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1