Concomitant proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: an ancillary study from the PRODIGE 23 trial

M. Bridoux , E. Aymes , T. Conroy , S. Gourgou , A. Carnot , C. Borg , M.-C. Le Deley , A. Turpin
{"title":"Concomitant proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: an ancillary study from the PRODIGE 23 trial","authors":"M. Bridoux ,&nbsp;E. Aymes ,&nbsp;T. Conroy ,&nbsp;S. Gourgou ,&nbsp;A. Carnot ,&nbsp;C. Borg ,&nbsp;M.-C. Le Deley ,&nbsp;A. Turpin","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately one in five cancer patients use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this work, we studied the effect of PPI co-medication during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the phase III PRODIGE 23 trial.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We gathered data on PPI exposure for patients from the PRODIGE 23 trial. PPI exposure was defined as PPI use during capecitabine treatment, either during CRT or as adjuvant therapy. The oncological outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of metastatic recurrence, and pathological response to preoperative treatment. The association of PPI use with RFS, metastatic recurrence, and histological complete response was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed data from 332 patients [165 in the NAC group with mFOLFIRINOX, capecitabine-based (CAP50) CRT, and surgery, and 167 in the standard-of-care control arm with CAP50 CRT and surgery]. Thirty-eight patients were co-administered a PPI during capecitabine administration. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the 3-year RFS rates were 74.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.6% to 78.8%] and 68.4% (95% CI 51.2% to 80.7%) in the non-PPI and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.16). The 3-year OS rates were 91.2% (95% CI 87.2% to 93.9%) and 83% (95% CI 65.7% to 92%) in the non-PPI group and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.38). We observed no difference in the pathological complete response rate between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We observed no significant association between PPI exposure and survival or pathological response of patients receiving capecitabine-based CRT for LARC, supporting earlier research findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Approximately one in five cancer patients use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this work, we studied the effect of PPI co-medication during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the phase III PRODIGE 23 trial.

Materials and methods

We gathered data on PPI exposure for patients from the PRODIGE 23 trial. PPI exposure was defined as PPI use during capecitabine treatment, either during CRT or as adjuvant therapy. The oncological outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of metastatic recurrence, and pathological response to preoperative treatment. The association of PPI use with RFS, metastatic recurrence, and histological complete response was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox models.

Results

We analyzed data from 332 patients [165 in the NAC group with mFOLFIRINOX, capecitabine-based (CAP50) CRT, and surgery, and 167 in the standard-of-care control arm with CAP50 CRT and surgery]. Thirty-eight patients were co-administered a PPI during capecitabine administration. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the 3-year RFS rates were 74.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.6% to 78.8%] and 68.4% (95% CI 51.2% to 80.7%) in the non-PPI and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.16). The 3-year OS rates were 91.2% (95% CI 87.2% to 93.9%) and 83% (95% CI 65.7% to 92%) in the non-PPI group and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.38). We observed no difference in the pathological complete response rate between both groups.

Conclusions

We observed no significant association between PPI exposure and survival or pathological response of patients receiving capecitabine-based CRT for LARC, supporting earlier research findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The South Australian 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy service: an 11-year review of toxicity, health-related quality of life, and survival GATA6 immunohistochemistry and prognosis after surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results from the ESPAC-4 trial Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma trends and treatment lines: real-world evidence from the French National Hospital Discharge database Continuous imaging to evaluate growth and drug responses of patient-derived colorectal tumouroids Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer: a multicenter observational study (NAPOLEON-2)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1