Beyond presentism in border externalization studies: Upcycled spatio-cultural geographies of imperial times

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104197
Sebastian Cobarrubias , Martin Lemberg-Pedersen
{"title":"Beyond presentism in border externalization studies: Upcycled spatio-cultural geographies of imperial times","authors":"Sebastian Cobarrubias ,&nbsp;Martin Lemberg-Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This Special Issue Introduction signals how post, decolonial and historical gazes enhance studies of border externalization efforts by European Union (EU) institutions and Member States in African countries. Research has only begun to acknowledge how economic, political and social geographies of extraterritorial migration management stretch back in time connecting to longer histories of empire. Predominantly, externalization studies have remained thoroughly embedded in a Eurocentric post-Cold War time frame where externalization was conceptualized as the spatial outgrowth of the European Union yielding a de-historicized spatiality, epistemology and narratives. This SI highlights the “methodological presentism” hitherto at work in border externalization research, and poses ways of challenging the associated epistemological boundaries. This introduction, and the themed articles therein, de-centre dominant spatio-temporal assumptions in border externalization research by applying a historical gaze on border practices through postcolonial and decolonial theory. We argue that future research on externalisation, and on the role of borders more broadly, would benefit from this approach, situating what seems an innovative spatial and political practice in a longer, and more instructive, timeframe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Special Issue Introduction signals how post, decolonial and historical gazes enhance studies of border externalization efforts by European Union (EU) institutions and Member States in African countries. Research has only begun to acknowledge how economic, political and social geographies of extraterritorial migration management stretch back in time connecting to longer histories of empire. Predominantly, externalization studies have remained thoroughly embedded in a Eurocentric post-Cold War time frame where externalization was conceptualized as the spatial outgrowth of the European Union yielding a de-historicized spatiality, epistemology and narratives. This SI highlights the “methodological presentism” hitherto at work in border externalization research, and poses ways of challenging the associated epistemological boundaries. This introduction, and the themed articles therein, de-centre dominant spatio-temporal assumptions in border externalization research by applying a historical gaze on border practices through postcolonial and decolonial theory. We argue that future research on externalisation, and on the role of borders more broadly, would benefit from this approach, situating what seems an innovative spatial and political practice in a longer, and more instructive, timeframe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边界外部化研究中的超越现在性:帝国时代的升级空间文化地理学
本特刊导言表明,后、非殖民和历史视角如何加强对欧洲联盟(欧盟)机构和非洲国家成员国边界外部化努力的研究。研究才刚刚开始认识到,域外移民管理的经济、政治和社会地理是如何追溯到更长的帝国历史的。主要的是,外化研究仍然完全植根于以欧洲为中心的冷战后时间框架中,在这个框架中,外化被概念化为欧盟的空间产物,产生了去历史化的空间性、认识论和叙事。本SI强调了迄今为止在边界外部化研究中工作的“方法论现场论”,并提出了挑战相关认识论边界的方法。本引言及其主题文章,通过后殖民和非殖民理论对边界实践进行历史审视,去中心化边界外化研究中占主导地位的时空假设。我们认为,未来对外部化和更广泛的边界作用的研究将受益于这种方法,将看似创新的空间和政治实践置于更长的时间框架中,更具启发性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Pearls of Influence: The Interactive Dynamics of Influencer and Place Branding in Shanxia Lake Town Pearl Cluster Platform Necropolitics: Digital Media Representations of Climate Change in the Pacific Islands Region Strategic dissonance: REDD+ implementation narratives and practices in Colombia Immobile mobility: Iranian migrant women between “here” and “there” Stakeholders’ conflicting orders and classifications of the environment and land use as drivers of environmental conflicts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1