Between binary- and mono-ontologies: The rewilding practice of Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Wetland Park

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104201
Zijing Shen , Junxi Qian , Hong Zhu , Shuang Tian
{"title":"Between binary- and mono-ontologies: The rewilding practice of Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Wetland Park","authors":"Zijing Shen ,&nbsp;Junxi Qian ,&nbsp;Hong Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuang Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article engages with the scholarships on rewilding, the Anthropocene, and urban nature to advance a case study of urban rewilding in Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Wetland Park (OCT Park), the only wetland park located in a megacity centre in China. We argue that the two philosophical underpinnings of rewilding, i.e., the ideal of a pristine baseline and human non-intervention, must be rethought in urban contexts. For one thing, Anthropocenic critiques of the Edenic imagination and the socio-nature dichotomy urge us to envision human-nature interactions as co-constituted and open-ended. For another, urban nature scattered and embedded in complex socio-natural negotiations provides different conditions for rewilding from remote natural reserves. To address these enquiries, we highlight three scenarios in OCT Park: (1) restoration and protection of the wetland; (2) establishment of Nature School and nature education; and (3) disciplining of tourists and the open-ended surprises. This paper reveals OCT Park’s future-focused approach to ecological restoration, its open attitude toward human participation, and the outcomes of human-nature interaction, which collectively constitute a potentially worthwhile model for rewilding practices in urban settings. In doing so, this article adds new knowledge to the rewilding framework by drawing the ontological positions advocated by the Anthropocene literature and an emphasis on urban contexts. Specifically, the paper reveals that human-nature relationships in urban rewilding practices manifest as dynamic negotiations, oscillating between the binary-ontology, which divides humans and non-humans into separate realms, and mono-ontology, which, in contrast, emphasises blurred boundaries and ontological positions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article engages with the scholarships on rewilding, the Anthropocene, and urban nature to advance a case study of urban rewilding in Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Wetland Park (OCT Park), the only wetland park located in a megacity centre in China. We argue that the two philosophical underpinnings of rewilding, i.e., the ideal of a pristine baseline and human non-intervention, must be rethought in urban contexts. For one thing, Anthropocenic critiques of the Edenic imagination and the socio-nature dichotomy urge us to envision human-nature interactions as co-constituted and open-ended. For another, urban nature scattered and embedded in complex socio-natural negotiations provides different conditions for rewilding from remote natural reserves. To address these enquiries, we highlight three scenarios in OCT Park: (1) restoration and protection of the wetland; (2) establishment of Nature School and nature education; and (3) disciplining of tourists and the open-ended surprises. This paper reveals OCT Park’s future-focused approach to ecological restoration, its open attitude toward human participation, and the outcomes of human-nature interaction, which collectively constitute a potentially worthwhile model for rewilding practices in urban settings. In doing so, this article adds new knowledge to the rewilding framework by drawing the ontological positions advocated by the Anthropocene literature and an emphasis on urban contexts. Specifically, the paper reveals that human-nature relationships in urban rewilding practices manifest as dynamic negotiations, oscillating between the binary-ontology, which divides humans and non-humans into separate realms, and mono-ontology, which, in contrast, emphasises blurred boundaries and ontological positions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Four seasons of border violence: The co-option of the seasons into the management of migration “The real truth about wolves”: Political ecology of wildlife conservation in the post-truth era The Infrastructural Time of resilience: Accounting for new (and old) forms of government in the South African grid Staging indigeneity and autochthony in Northern Eurasia Neoliberal changes and perspectives for financialization in the management of Brazil’s water and sanitation services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1