From real estate financialization to decentralization: A comparative review of REITs and blockchain-based tokenization

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104193
Ang Liu , Cheng Chen
{"title":"From real estate financialization to decentralization: A comparative review of REITs and blockchain-based tokenization","authors":"Ang Liu ,&nbsp;Cheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Blockchain-based tokenization represents a transformative force in the real estate sector, offering a compelling alternative to the well-established model of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). As the real estate industry evolves from financialization to decentralization, driven by technological advancements, these two models offer distinct approaches to democratizing real estate investment. REITs have long been a cornerstone of real estate financialization, allowing individual investors to participate in large-scale real estate ventures through fractional ownership of diversified property portfolios, thus advancing financial supply and share of the housing market. However, the advent of blockchain technology and decentralized finance (DeFi) introduces a new paradigm where real estate ownership can be fractionalized into digital tokens, enhancing liquidity, transparency, and accessibility through global 24/7 trading platforms. The findings suggest that while REITs have successfully broadened the investor base and improved market liquidity, blockchain-based tokenization has the potential to advance these achievements further by lowering entry barriers, reducing transaction costs, and decentralizing market operations. However, the adoption of blockchain technology in real estate also presents challenges, including regulatory uncertainties, technological risks, and the need for robust governance frameworks. As the lines between finance and technology continue to blur, this research underscores the necessity of adapting regulatory frameworks and investment strategies to navigate the evolving landscape of real estate investment. The critical review concludes by discussing the future implications of these trends, highlighting the need for continued research and regulatory innovation to fully realize the potential of decentralized real estate markets, particularly in examining housing inequality and affordability, as housing is not only an important investment vehicle but also as a fundamental shelter for people to live.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blockchain-based tokenization represents a transformative force in the real estate sector, offering a compelling alternative to the well-established model of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). As the real estate industry evolves from financialization to decentralization, driven by technological advancements, these two models offer distinct approaches to democratizing real estate investment. REITs have long been a cornerstone of real estate financialization, allowing individual investors to participate in large-scale real estate ventures through fractional ownership of diversified property portfolios, thus advancing financial supply and share of the housing market. However, the advent of blockchain technology and decentralized finance (DeFi) introduces a new paradigm where real estate ownership can be fractionalized into digital tokens, enhancing liquidity, transparency, and accessibility through global 24/7 trading platforms. The findings suggest that while REITs have successfully broadened the investor base and improved market liquidity, blockchain-based tokenization has the potential to advance these achievements further by lowering entry barriers, reducing transaction costs, and decentralizing market operations. However, the adoption of blockchain technology in real estate also presents challenges, including regulatory uncertainties, technological risks, and the need for robust governance frameworks. As the lines between finance and technology continue to blur, this research underscores the necessity of adapting regulatory frameworks and investment strategies to navigate the evolving landscape of real estate investment. The critical review concludes by discussing the future implications of these trends, highlighting the need for continued research and regulatory innovation to fully realize the potential of decentralized real estate markets, particularly in examining housing inequality and affordability, as housing is not only an important investment vehicle but also as a fundamental shelter for people to live.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Remaking land–water boundaries in the Rhone plain in Switzerland: A reinterpretation of past and present river training using a ‘postcolonial mirror’ “They’re probably quite used to this idea of us and them”: The racialising assemblage and development discourses in school geography in England Urbanization’s mediator: Reassembling rural tibetan lives through pig breed changes Can wild geese remake a zoo? The promise of more-than-human heterotopia for a politics of living with urban wildlife The ‘Borders of Berlin’: West African protests and the coloniality of Euro-African deportation cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1