Composite effects of forest harvests and seismic lines influence re-establishment of trees and shrubs in Alberta’s mesic upland boreal forest

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122506
Leonardo Viliani , Scott E. Nielsen
{"title":"Composite effects of forest harvests and seismic lines influence re-establishment of trees and shrubs in Alberta’s mesic upland boreal forest","authors":"Leonardo Viliani ,&nbsp;Scott E. Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the boreal biome, disturbances drive natural vegetation dynamics and forest recovery. However, as the frequency and extent of anthropogenic disturbances increase, there is a potential for composite or synergistic effects to emerge among disturbances, thereby affecting forest regeneration. This is particularly relevant in Alberta's boreal forest, where oil exploration through networks of narrow clearings called seismic lines dissect and fragment forests, but sometimes also overlap with other anthropogenic disturbances. A focus on the restoration of seismic lines without considering these composite disturbances may result in reduced efficacy. One question for seismic line restoration is whether forest harvesting “erases” seismic lines within them by restoring composition and structure, thus precluding the need for further restoration actions. To test this question, we measured responses in the abundance and composition of trees and shrubs at 15 mesic upland forest sites that were recently harvested and contained an existing conventional seismic line. For each site, we compared two pairs of plots on and off seismic lines with respect to inside and outside of forest harvests. We found that harvested seismic lines had ∼ 130 % more woody stems than untreated lines through adjacent mature forests, suggesting that forest harvesting was facilitating the structural recovery of the forest inside the line. Moreover, the simultaneous occurrence of both disturbances led to increases in deciduous tree stems while decreasing shrub abundance, potentially helping to achieve the reforestation goals for seismic lines. Finally, we observed interactive effects between the two disturbances on the relative abundance for ∼ 40 % of the species assemblage. We demonstrate that the spatial overlap of seismic lines and forest harvesting can facilitate restoration of forest structure, but also results in a distinct “composite” legacy signature on species composition. While forest harvesting appeared effective in “erasing” seismic lines without further active restoration efforts, emerging composite effects can significantly influence forest composition, with potential long-term implications for regeneration that require further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 122506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the boreal biome, disturbances drive natural vegetation dynamics and forest recovery. However, as the frequency and extent of anthropogenic disturbances increase, there is a potential for composite or synergistic effects to emerge among disturbances, thereby affecting forest regeneration. This is particularly relevant in Alberta's boreal forest, where oil exploration through networks of narrow clearings called seismic lines dissect and fragment forests, but sometimes also overlap with other anthropogenic disturbances. A focus on the restoration of seismic lines without considering these composite disturbances may result in reduced efficacy. One question for seismic line restoration is whether forest harvesting “erases” seismic lines within them by restoring composition and structure, thus precluding the need for further restoration actions. To test this question, we measured responses in the abundance and composition of trees and shrubs at 15 mesic upland forest sites that were recently harvested and contained an existing conventional seismic line. For each site, we compared two pairs of plots on and off seismic lines with respect to inside and outside of forest harvests. We found that harvested seismic lines had ∼ 130 % more woody stems than untreated lines through adjacent mature forests, suggesting that forest harvesting was facilitating the structural recovery of the forest inside the line. Moreover, the simultaneous occurrence of both disturbances led to increases in deciduous tree stems while decreasing shrub abundance, potentially helping to achieve the reforestation goals for seismic lines. Finally, we observed interactive effects between the two disturbances on the relative abundance for ∼ 40 % of the species assemblage. We demonstrate that the spatial overlap of seismic lines and forest harvesting can facilitate restoration of forest structure, but also results in a distinct “composite” legacy signature on species composition. While forest harvesting appeared effective in “erasing” seismic lines without further active restoration efforts, emerging composite effects can significantly influence forest composition, with potential long-term implications for regeneration that require further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林收成和地震线的复合效应影响了阿尔伯塔mesic高地北方森林中树木和灌木的重建
在北方生物群系中,干扰驱动自然植被动态和森林恢复。然而,随着人为干扰的频率和程度的增加,干扰之间可能出现复合或协同效应,从而影响森林更新。这在艾伯塔省的北方森林尤其重要,在那里,石油勘探通过被称为地震线的狭窄间隙网络解剖和破坏森林,但有时也与其他人为干扰重叠。如果只关注地震线的恢复而不考虑这些综合干扰,可能会降低恢复效果。恢复地震线的一个问题是,森林采伐是否通过恢复组成和结构来“抹去”其中的地震线,从而排除进一步恢复行动的需要。为了验证这个问题,我们测量了15个最近采伐的山地森林地点树木和灌木的丰度和组成的响应,这些地点包含现有的常规地震线。对于每个地点,我们比较了地震线上和线下的两对地块,分别是森林采伐的内部和外部。我们发现,通过邻近成熟森林,采伐的地震线比未经处理的地震线多出约130 %的木本茎,这表明森林采伐促进了线内森林的结构恢复。此外,这两种干扰的同时发生导致落叶乔木茎的增加而灌木丰度的减少,可能有助于实现地震线的再造林目标。最后,我们观察到两种干扰之间的相互作用对物种组合的相对丰度产生了~ 40% %的影响。研究表明,地震线和森林采伐的空间重叠可以促进森林结构的恢复,但也会导致物种组成上明显的“复合”遗产特征。虽然森林采伐在无需进一步积极恢复努力的情况下似乎有效地“抹去”地震线,但新出现的复合效应可能对森林组成产生重大影响,对再生可能产生的长期影响需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Forest age and mixed mycorrhizal strategies mediate functional diversity contributions to ecosystem stability Cessation of management for Phyllostachys edulis forests exacerbates soil microbial C limitation and expands particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon pools The paradox of attraction: Why push-and-pull doesn’t always work for spruce protection against bark beetles Responses of understory plant diversity to fire regimes in temperate forests Effects of different stand densities and pruning on timber volume and ecosystem carbon sink in subtropical secondary forests: A Case study from Zhejiang Province, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1