Composite effects of forest harvests and seismic lines influence re-establishment of trees and shrubs in Alberta’s mesic upland boreal forest

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122506
Leonardo Viliani , Scott E. Nielsen
{"title":"Composite effects of forest harvests and seismic lines influence re-establishment of trees and shrubs in Alberta’s mesic upland boreal forest","authors":"Leonardo Viliani ,&nbsp;Scott E. Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the boreal biome, disturbances drive natural vegetation dynamics and forest recovery. However, as the frequency and extent of anthropogenic disturbances increase, there is a potential for composite or synergistic effects to emerge among disturbances, thereby affecting forest regeneration. This is particularly relevant in Alberta's boreal forest, where oil exploration through networks of narrow clearings called seismic lines dissect and fragment forests, but sometimes also overlap with other anthropogenic disturbances. A focus on the restoration of seismic lines without considering these composite disturbances may result in reduced efficacy. One question for seismic line restoration is whether forest harvesting “erases” seismic lines within them by restoring composition and structure, thus precluding the need for further restoration actions. To test this question, we measured responses in the abundance and composition of trees and shrubs at 15 mesic upland forest sites that were recently harvested and contained an existing conventional seismic line. For each site, we compared two pairs of plots on and off seismic lines with respect to inside and outside of forest harvests. We found that harvested seismic lines had ∼ 130 % more woody stems than untreated lines through adjacent mature forests, suggesting that forest harvesting was facilitating the structural recovery of the forest inside the line. Moreover, the simultaneous occurrence of both disturbances led to increases in deciduous tree stems while decreasing shrub abundance, potentially helping to achieve the reforestation goals for seismic lines. Finally, we observed interactive effects between the two disturbances on the relative abundance for ∼ 40 % of the species assemblage. We demonstrate that the spatial overlap of seismic lines and forest harvesting can facilitate restoration of forest structure, but also results in a distinct “composite” legacy signature on species composition. While forest harvesting appeared effective in “erasing” seismic lines without further active restoration efforts, emerging composite effects can significantly influence forest composition, with potential long-term implications for regeneration that require further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 122506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the boreal biome, disturbances drive natural vegetation dynamics and forest recovery. However, as the frequency and extent of anthropogenic disturbances increase, there is a potential for composite or synergistic effects to emerge among disturbances, thereby affecting forest regeneration. This is particularly relevant in Alberta's boreal forest, where oil exploration through networks of narrow clearings called seismic lines dissect and fragment forests, but sometimes also overlap with other anthropogenic disturbances. A focus on the restoration of seismic lines without considering these composite disturbances may result in reduced efficacy. One question for seismic line restoration is whether forest harvesting “erases” seismic lines within them by restoring composition and structure, thus precluding the need for further restoration actions. To test this question, we measured responses in the abundance and composition of trees and shrubs at 15 mesic upland forest sites that were recently harvested and contained an existing conventional seismic line. For each site, we compared two pairs of plots on and off seismic lines with respect to inside and outside of forest harvests. We found that harvested seismic lines had ∼ 130 % more woody stems than untreated lines through adjacent mature forests, suggesting that forest harvesting was facilitating the structural recovery of the forest inside the line. Moreover, the simultaneous occurrence of both disturbances led to increases in deciduous tree stems while decreasing shrub abundance, potentially helping to achieve the reforestation goals for seismic lines. Finally, we observed interactive effects between the two disturbances on the relative abundance for ∼ 40 % of the species assemblage. We demonstrate that the spatial overlap of seismic lines and forest harvesting can facilitate restoration of forest structure, but also results in a distinct “composite” legacy signature on species composition. While forest harvesting appeared effective in “erasing” seismic lines without further active restoration efforts, emerging composite effects can significantly influence forest composition, with potential long-term implications for regeneration that require further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Complexity in long-term stand dynamics of mixed-species, multi-cohort stands using an imputation/copula tree growth model Short-interval fires homogenise the structure of diverse temperate forests Effects of cultivation on soil carbon and nitrogen along an altitudinal gradient in the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau Sustained superiority of biochar over straw for enhancing soil biological-phosphorus via the mediation of phoD-harboring bacteria in subtropical Moso bamboo forests Mediterranean shrub assemblage of holm oak forests (Quercus ilex L.) is driven by aridity and soil texture rather than forest biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1