Cefazolin Alone Versus Cefazolin With Tobramycin or Gentamicin as Intraoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101613
Meera M. Dhodapkar MD, MHS, Scott J. Halperin MD, MHS, Zachary Radford MD, Lee E. Rubin MD, FAAOS, FAOA, Jonathan N. Grauer MD, Mengnai Li FAAOS, MD, PhD
{"title":"Cefazolin Alone Versus Cefazolin With Tobramycin or Gentamicin as Intraoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty","authors":"Meera M. Dhodapkar MD, MHS,&nbsp;Scott J. Halperin MD, MHS,&nbsp;Zachary Radford MD,&nbsp;Lee E. Rubin MD, FAAOS, FAOA,&nbsp;Jonathan N. Grauer MD,&nbsp;Mengnai Li FAAOS, MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). While cefazolin is the standard prophylactic antibiotic, some groups have considered adding aminoglycosides (gentamycin or tobramycin) to this regimen.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult primary THA and TKA patients were identified from 2010-2021 Q1 PearlDiver M151 database. Inclusion criteria were activity in the database ≥ 90 days postoperative and no infectious, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses within 90 days preoperative. Intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were determined using Current Procedural Terminology J codes. For both THA and TKA, 2 subcohorts were created: (1) Patients who received cefazolin alone and (2) cefazolin and tobramycin or gentamicin. Differences in 90-day postoperative adverse outcomes were assessed with multivariable logistic regression controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Five-year implant survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For THA, 32,882 patients were identified, prophylactic cefazolin alone was given to 30,527 (92.8%), and cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin was given to 2355 (7.2%). For TKA, 119,611 patients were identified, prophylactic cefazolin alone was given to 110,469 (92.4%), and cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin was given to 9142 (7.6%). Overall SSI rate for THA was 1.1% and for TKA 0.8%. For both THA and TKA, antibiotic subgroups were clinically similar with regard to age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. On univariable and multivariable analysis, no 90-day outcomes varied significantly. Five-year implant survivals were not significantly different.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For THA and TKA, cefazolin alone vs cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin were not found to have differences in rates of perioperative adverse outcomes (including SSI/prosthetic joint infection) or 5-year revision rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234412400298X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). While cefazolin is the standard prophylactic antibiotic, some groups have considered adding aminoglycosides (gentamycin or tobramycin) to this regimen.

Methods

Adult primary THA and TKA patients were identified from 2010-2021 Q1 PearlDiver M151 database. Inclusion criteria were activity in the database ≥ 90 days postoperative and no infectious, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses within 90 days preoperative. Intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were determined using Current Procedural Terminology J codes. For both THA and TKA, 2 subcohorts were created: (1) Patients who received cefazolin alone and (2) cefazolin and tobramycin or gentamicin. Differences in 90-day postoperative adverse outcomes were assessed with multivariable logistic regression controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Five-year implant survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests.

Results

For THA, 32,882 patients were identified, prophylactic cefazolin alone was given to 30,527 (92.8%), and cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin was given to 2355 (7.2%). For TKA, 119,611 patients were identified, prophylactic cefazolin alone was given to 110,469 (92.4%), and cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin was given to 9142 (7.6%). Overall SSI rate for THA was 1.1% and for TKA 0.8%. For both THA and TKA, antibiotic subgroups were clinically similar with regard to age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. On univariable and multivariable analysis, no 90-day outcomes varied significantly. Five-year implant survivals were not significantly different.

Conclusions

For THA and TKA, cefazolin alone vs cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin were not found to have differences in rates of perioperative adverse outcomes (including SSI/prosthetic joint infection) or 5-year revision rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Robotic-assisted Conversion of Arthrodesis to Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Sequential Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in a Patient With Pfeifer-Weber-Christian Disease Femoral Nail and Cement Static Spacer Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Knee Infection Understanding Hip Pain Through Social Media: An Initial Overview of an International Web-Based Survey Reply to "Comment on: A Contemporary Analysis of Discharge Disposition Following Total Joint Arthroplasty"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1