Cefazolin Alone Versus Cefazolin With Tobramycin or Gentamicin as Intraoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101613
Meera M. Dhodapkar MD, MHS, Scott J. Halperin MD, MHS, Zachary Radford MD, Lee E. Rubin MD, FAAOS, FAOA, Jonathan N. Grauer MD, Mengnai Li FAAOS, MD, PhD
{"title":"Cefazolin Alone Versus Cefazolin With Tobramycin or Gentamicin as Intraoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty","authors":"Meera M. Dhodapkar MD, MHS,&nbsp;Scott J. Halperin MD, MHS,&nbsp;Zachary Radford MD,&nbsp;Lee E. Rubin MD, FAAOS, FAOA,&nbsp;Jonathan N. Grauer MD,&nbsp;Mengnai Li FAAOS, MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). While cefazolin is the standard prophylactic antibiotic, some groups have considered adding aminoglycosides (gentamycin or tobramycin) to this regimen.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult primary THA and TKA patients were identified from 2010-2021 Q1 PearlDiver M151 database. Inclusion criteria were activity in the database ≥ 90 days postoperative and no infectious, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses within 90 days preoperative. Intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were determined using Current Procedural Terminology J codes. For both THA and TKA, 2 subcohorts were created: (1) Patients who received cefazolin alone and (2) cefazolin and tobramycin or gentamicin. Differences in 90-day postoperative adverse outcomes were assessed with multivariable logistic regression controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Five-year implant survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For THA, 32,882 patients were identified, prophylactic cefazolin alone was given to 30,527 (92.8%), and cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin was given to 2355 (7.2%). For TKA, 119,611 patients were identified, prophylactic cefazolin alone was given to 110,469 (92.4%), and cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin was given to 9142 (7.6%). Overall SSI rate for THA was 1.1% and for TKA 0.8%. For both THA and TKA, antibiotic subgroups were clinically similar with regard to age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. On univariable and multivariable analysis, no 90-day outcomes varied significantly. Five-year implant survivals were not significantly different.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For THA and TKA, cefazolin alone vs cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin were not found to have differences in rates of perioperative adverse outcomes (including SSI/prosthetic joint infection) or 5-year revision rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234412400298X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). While cefazolin is the standard prophylactic antibiotic, some groups have considered adding aminoglycosides (gentamycin or tobramycin) to this regimen.

Methods

Adult primary THA and TKA patients were identified from 2010-2021 Q1 PearlDiver M151 database. Inclusion criteria were activity in the database ≥ 90 days postoperative and no infectious, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses within 90 days preoperative. Intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were determined using Current Procedural Terminology J codes. For both THA and TKA, 2 subcohorts were created: (1) Patients who received cefazolin alone and (2) cefazolin and tobramycin or gentamicin. Differences in 90-day postoperative adverse outcomes were assessed with multivariable logistic regression controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Five-year implant survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests.

Results

For THA, 32,882 patients were identified, prophylactic cefazolin alone was given to 30,527 (92.8%), and cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin was given to 2355 (7.2%). For TKA, 119,611 patients were identified, prophylactic cefazolin alone was given to 110,469 (92.4%), and cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin was given to 9142 (7.6%). Overall SSI rate for THA was 1.1% and for TKA 0.8%. For both THA and TKA, antibiotic subgroups were clinically similar with regard to age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. On univariable and multivariable analysis, no 90-day outcomes varied significantly. Five-year implant survivals were not significantly different.

Conclusions

For THA and TKA, cefazolin alone vs cefazolin + gentamicin/tobramycin were not found to have differences in rates of perioperative adverse outcomes (including SSI/prosthetic joint infection) or 5-year revision rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头孢唑林单独与头孢唑林联合妥布霉素或庆大霉素作为全关节置换术中预防抗生素的比较
背景:人工关节感染是全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)的严重并发症。虽然头孢唑林是标准的预防性抗生素,但一些研究小组已经考虑在该方案中加入氨基糖苷类药物(庆大霉素或妥布霉素)。方法从2010-2021 Q1 PearlDiver M151数据库中筛选成人原发性THA和TKA患者。纳入标准为术后≥90天数据库活动,术前90天无感染性、肿瘤性或创伤性诊断。术中抗生素预防方案采用现行程序术语J规范确定。对于THA和TKA,创建了2个亚队列:(1)单独接受头孢唑林的患者和(2)头孢唑林联合妥布霉素或庆大霉素的患者。采用控制年龄、性别和Elixhauser合并症指数的多变量logistic回归评估术后90天不良结局的差异。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和log-rank检验评估种植体5年存活率。结果共发现32882例THA患者,其中预防性头孢唑林用药30527例(92.8%),头孢唑林+庆大霉素/妥布霉素用药2355例(7.2%)。确诊TKA患者119611例,预防性头孢唑林用药110469例(92.4%),头孢唑林+庆大霉素/妥布霉素用药9142例(7.6%)。THA的总体SSI率为1.1%,TKA为0.8%。对于THA和TKA,抗生素亚组在年龄、性别和Elixhauser合并症指数方面临床相似。在单变量和多变量分析中,90天的结果没有显著差异。种植体5年存活率无显著差异。结论对于全髋关节置换术和全髋关节置换术,头孢唑林单用与头孢唑林+庆大霉素/妥布霉素在围手术期不良事件发生率(包括SSI/假关节感染)或5年翻修率方面均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Bone Morphogenetic Protein Augmentation of Large Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Viable Option for Massive Bone Loss Incidence and Reasons for Direct Transfers Among Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Performed at Ambulatory Surgical Centers Low Preoperative Platelet Count Is Associated With Deep Surgical Site Infection in Knee Arthroplasty Quantifying the Opportunity Cost of Resident Involvement in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty No Additive Analgesic Effect of Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee Block Over Local Infiltration Analgesia Only Around Arthrotomy Site in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1