Assessment of performance and quality indices of glutinous rice under different drying methods

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2024.104161
Kabiru Ayobami Jimoh , Norhashila Hashim , Rosnah Shamsudin , Hasfalina Che Man , Mahirah Jahari
{"title":"Assessment of performance and quality indices of glutinous rice under different drying methods","authors":"Kabiru Ayobami Jimoh ,&nbsp;Norhashila Hashim ,&nbsp;Rosnah Shamsudin ,&nbsp;Hasfalina Che Man ,&nbsp;Mahirah Jahari","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2024.104161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drying is an energy-intensive process that prolongs grain shelf life and reduces postharvest losses from moisture-induced spoilage. Stakeholders in the grain supply chain have diverse interests regarding grain quality, energy efficiency, environmental impact, and the economic performance of the drying process. Therefore, the processing industries are highly concerned with the selection of most appropriate drying method for grain. This study experimentally evaluated various performance indices of glutinous rice under different drying methods, including hot air box drying (BD: 50 °C−70 °C), convective oven drying (COD: 50 °C−70 °C), infrared drying (IRD, at 200 W/m<sup>2</sup>−600 W/m<sup>2</sup>) and microwave drying (MWD: 1000 W/kg−3000 W/kg). The results demonstrated that MWD outperformed other methods in terms of drying kinetics, with an average production rate of ∼1.65, ∼2.02, and ∼2.37 times higher than IRD, BD, and COD, respectively. Also, MWD has the most promising economic performance with least environmental impact which was ∼28.64, ∼16.31 and ∼2.21 times lower than BD, COD and IRD, respectively. Despite the excellent drying efficiency, sustainability indices, energy and exergy efficiency exhibited by IRD and MWD compared to other methods, they are still characterized with low milling quality and macronutrients retention in the final product. Therefore, while IRD and MWD excel in drying efficiency and sustainability, they need further quality improvements before widespread industrial use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 104161"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138824005575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drying is an energy-intensive process that prolongs grain shelf life and reduces postharvest losses from moisture-induced spoilage. Stakeholders in the grain supply chain have diverse interests regarding grain quality, energy efficiency, environmental impact, and the economic performance of the drying process. Therefore, the processing industries are highly concerned with the selection of most appropriate drying method for grain. This study experimentally evaluated various performance indices of glutinous rice under different drying methods, including hot air box drying (BD: 50 °C−70 °C), convective oven drying (COD: 50 °C−70 °C), infrared drying (IRD, at 200 W/m2−600 W/m2) and microwave drying (MWD: 1000 W/kg−3000 W/kg). The results demonstrated that MWD outperformed other methods in terms of drying kinetics, with an average production rate of ∼1.65, ∼2.02, and ∼2.37 times higher than IRD, BD, and COD, respectively. Also, MWD has the most promising economic performance with least environmental impact which was ∼28.64, ∼16.31 and ∼2.21 times lower than BD, COD and IRD, respectively. Despite the excellent drying efficiency, sustainability indices, energy and exergy efficiency exhibited by IRD and MWD compared to other methods, they are still characterized with low milling quality and macronutrients retention in the final product. Therefore, while IRD and MWD excel in drying efficiency and sustainability, they need further quality improvements before widespread industrial use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
期刊最新文献
LCA and TEA analyses of bio-jet fuel prepared from Arundo donax Peer-to-peer energy trading of hydrogen-producing prosumers in power distribution network Performance enhancement of oscillating heat pipes by structural modification: A comprehensive review The integration of a fully printed carbon nanotube-based thermoelectric generator as a functional structural lamina within CFRP laminate composite: Powering electronic devices and wireless data transmission from multifunctional composites Robust optimization-based energy management system for integrating renewable energy resources and smart grid technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1