Repeated intravenous infusions of esketamine in inpatients with bipolar depression: A retrospective real-world study

Q3 Psychology Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100870
Naima Guhad Shire , Michael Ioannou , Örjan Falk , Ane Bakken Wold , Caroline Wass , Zoltán Szabó , Steinn Steingrimsson
{"title":"Repeated intravenous infusions of esketamine in inpatients with bipolar depression: A retrospective real-world study","authors":"Naima Guhad Shire ,&nbsp;Michael Ioannou ,&nbsp;Örjan Falk ,&nbsp;Ane Bakken Wold ,&nbsp;Caroline Wass ,&nbsp;Zoltán Szabó ,&nbsp;Steinn Steingrimsson","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ketamine shows promise for treating bipolar depression, particularly in severe cases. However, the optimal administration route and enantiomer (esketamine, arketamine, or racemic mixture) remain unclear. This case series presents data on intravenous (IV) esketamine in bipolar depression, addressing a gap in published literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective chart review included adult inpatients with bipolar depression treated with multiple IV esketamine infusions. Outcomes were measured using the self-rated Montgomery Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS-S) and clinician-rated improved Global Clinical Impression Scale-Severity Index (rCGI-S). Tolerability data were also collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen patients received 4–6 IV esketamine infusions over two weeks. Statistically significant improvements were observed in MADRS-S total scores (<em>p</em> = 0.002) and rCGI-S scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) but not in MADRS-S suicidal thoughts item (<em>p</em> = 0.125). Infusions were generally well-tolerated, with treatment-emergent hypomania in two patients (15.4 %).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>The retrospective design without a control group limited effectiveness evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preliminary results of IV esketamine for bipolar depression are promising, but its role in treatment algorithms requires clarification. Randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate its effectiveness further.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100870"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ketamine shows promise for treating bipolar depression, particularly in severe cases. However, the optimal administration route and enantiomer (esketamine, arketamine, or racemic mixture) remain unclear. This case series presents data on intravenous (IV) esketamine in bipolar depression, addressing a gap in published literature.

Methods

This retrospective chart review included adult inpatients with bipolar depression treated with multiple IV esketamine infusions. Outcomes were measured using the self-rated Montgomery Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS-S) and clinician-rated improved Global Clinical Impression Scale-Severity Index (rCGI-S). Tolerability data were also collected.

Results

Thirteen patients received 4–6 IV esketamine infusions over two weeks. Statistically significant improvements were observed in MADRS-S total scores (p = 0.002) and rCGI-S scores (p < 0.001) but not in MADRS-S suicidal thoughts item (p = 0.125). Infusions were generally well-tolerated, with treatment-emergent hypomania in two patients (15.4 %).

Limitations

The retrospective design without a control group limited effectiveness evaluation.

Conclusions

Preliminary results of IV esketamine for bipolar depression are promising, but its role in treatment algorithms requires clarification. Randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate its effectiveness further.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双相抑郁症住院患者反复静脉输注艾氯胺酮:一项回顾性现实世界研究
背景氯胺酮显示出治疗双相抑郁症的希望,特别是在严重的病例中。然而,最佳给药途径和对映体(艾氯胺酮、阿氯胺酮或外消旋混合物)仍不清楚。本病例系列介绍了静脉注射(IV)艾氯胺酮治疗双相抑郁症的数据,解决了已发表文献中的空白。方法回顾性分析多次静脉注射艾氯胺酮治疗的成年双相抑郁症患者。结果采用自评Montgomery Åsberg抑郁量表(MADRS-S)和临床评定改良的全球临床印象量表-严重程度指数(rCGI-S)进行测量。还收集了耐受性数据。结果13例患者在2周内静脉滴注艾氯胺酮4 ~ 6次。MADRS-S总分(p = 0.002)和rCGI-S评分(p <;0.001),但在MADRS-S自杀念头项中无差异(p = 0.125)。输注总体耐受良好,2例患者(15.4%)出现治疗后出现的轻度躁狂。局限性:没有对照组的回顾性设计限制了有效性评估。结论静脉注射艾氯胺酮治疗双相抑郁症的初步结果是有希望的,但其在治疗算法中的作用有待明确。需要随机对照研究进一步调查其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
The roles of neuroticism and schizotypy in emotional abuse and mental health association: a replication and extension of Alnassar et al. (2024) Variability exists across outcomes measured and reported in studies assessing interventions for generalized anxiety disorder during the perinatal period: A scoping review Perceived stigma and quality of life among people living with mental illness in Ethiopia: An institutional cross-sectional study Reduction of suicidality with high-frequency vertex magnetic seizure therapy in treatment-resistant depression: A pooled secondary analysis Depression trajectories amongst individuals with opioid use disorder treated with extended-release naltrexone during 52-weeks, followed by a 52-week post-treatment period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1