Behind bars: A trauma-informed examination of mental health through importation and deprivation models in prisons

Sania Mazher, Takashi Arai
{"title":"Behind bars: A trauma-informed examination of mental health through importation and deprivation models in prisons","authors":"Sania Mazher,&nbsp;Takashi Arai","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2025.100516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prisons are designed as institutions to punish criminal behavior, protect society from offenders, and rehabilitate individuals to reduce reoffending. However, research increasingly indicates that incarceration can exacerbate vulnerabilities and worsen mental health. Studies from numerous countries reveal that mental illness rates among prisoners are significantly higher than those in the general population. Evidence suggests that many inmates face considerable hardships prior to incarceration, which may contribute to their mental health challenges. Yet, other findings point to the prison environment itself as a factor that fosters mental health issues. This discussion centers on two key theories: the importation and deprivation models. The Importation Model (Irwin &amp; Cressey, 1962) posits that inmates bring their pre-existing social backgrounds, values, and behaviors into prison, which influence how they interact with the institution. In contrast, the Deprivation Model (Skyes, 1958) emphasizes that prison conditions, such as the loss of autonomy and social connections, shape inmate behavior. Contemporary research (Dye, 2010; Edgemon, 2016; Kuo et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2020; integrates both models, recognizing that individual characteristics and institutional deprivations interact to influence behavior. This paper explores these models through the lens of trauma, recognizing that trauma frequently precedes imprisonment and is often compounded within prison walls. This systematic review explored the association between childhood maltreatment, prison environment and mental health of prisoners (importation and deprivation model) based on systematic searches of five databases. In total, 31 studies met our inclusion criteria. Results suggested that both childhood maltreatment and prison environment had positive association with various mental health problems in prisoners. The review highlights the need for more research on deprivation model as researchers found only two studies. It further highlighted the importance of addressing childhood maltreatment, prison environment, and mental health issues in prisoners through prevention programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 100516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749925000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prisons are designed as institutions to punish criminal behavior, protect society from offenders, and rehabilitate individuals to reduce reoffending. However, research increasingly indicates that incarceration can exacerbate vulnerabilities and worsen mental health. Studies from numerous countries reveal that mental illness rates among prisoners are significantly higher than those in the general population. Evidence suggests that many inmates face considerable hardships prior to incarceration, which may contribute to their mental health challenges. Yet, other findings point to the prison environment itself as a factor that fosters mental health issues. This discussion centers on two key theories: the importation and deprivation models. The Importation Model (Irwin & Cressey, 1962) posits that inmates bring their pre-existing social backgrounds, values, and behaviors into prison, which influence how they interact with the institution. In contrast, the Deprivation Model (Skyes, 1958) emphasizes that prison conditions, such as the loss of autonomy and social connections, shape inmate behavior. Contemporary research (Dye, 2010; Edgemon, 2016; Kuo et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2020; integrates both models, recognizing that individual characteristics and institutional deprivations interact to influence behavior. This paper explores these models through the lens of trauma, recognizing that trauma frequently precedes imprisonment and is often compounded within prison walls. This systematic review explored the association between childhood maltreatment, prison environment and mental health of prisoners (importation and deprivation model) based on systematic searches of five databases. In total, 31 studies met our inclusion criteria. Results suggested that both childhood maltreatment and prison environment had positive association with various mental health problems in prisoners. The review highlights the need for more research on deprivation model as researchers found only two studies. It further highlighted the importance of addressing childhood maltreatment, prison environment, and mental health issues in prisoners through prevention programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Behind bars: A trauma-informed examination of mental health through importation and deprivation models in prisons Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder among general medicine residents Characteristic and frequency of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) in homosexual conscripts referred to a military Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran, Iran between 2014_2020 Developing a model of experiential avoidance based on childhood trauma and victimization, mediated by insecure attachment styles Addressing students’ traumatic experiences and impact of social supports: Scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1