Comparisons of pretreatment extraction methods for tree-ring radiocarbon analysis

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Chemical Geology Pub Date : 2025-04-05 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122648
Jingdi Qin , Zhenchuan Niu , Weijian Zhou , Yunfei Huang , Xue Feng , Dan Liang , Guowei Wang , Xuefeng Lu , Yu Huang , Hong Wang
{"title":"Comparisons of pretreatment extraction methods for tree-ring radiocarbon analysis","authors":"Jingdi Qin ,&nbsp;Zhenchuan Niu ,&nbsp;Weijian Zhou ,&nbsp;Yunfei Huang ,&nbsp;Xue Feng ,&nbsp;Dan Liang ,&nbsp;Guowei Wang ,&nbsp;Xuefeng Lu ,&nbsp;Yu Huang ,&nbsp;Hong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An appropriate method for tree-ring pretreatment is essential to ensure the reliability of <sup>14</sup>C data. This study compared three pretreatment methods for tree rings: acid-base-acid-bleaching (ABA-B), Jayme-Wise and an improved method proposed in this research. The improved method utilizes an ultrasonic bath instead of Soxhlet extraction in the Jayme-Wise method. We assessed the <sup>14</sup>C results of the three methods using subfossil tree-ring samples from the Sixth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison and contemporary tree-ring samples from Shangdianzi. The <sup>14</sup>C results showed that both the improved and the Jayme-Wise methods were effective for extracting α-cellulose from subfossil and modern tree-ring samples. The ABA-B method was sufficient only for subfossil wood, while unstable for the modern tree-ring samples when the heartwood-sapwood transition was presence. The Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy results indicated that the purity of α-cellulose extracted by the improved method was similar to that of pure α-cellulose. In comparison to the Jayme-Wise method, the improved method reduced the extraction time and the amount of organic solvent, while increased batch processing capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9847,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology","volume":"678 ","pages":"Article 122648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254125000385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An appropriate method for tree-ring pretreatment is essential to ensure the reliability of 14C data. This study compared three pretreatment methods for tree rings: acid-base-acid-bleaching (ABA-B), Jayme-Wise and an improved method proposed in this research. The improved method utilizes an ultrasonic bath instead of Soxhlet extraction in the Jayme-Wise method. We assessed the 14C results of the three methods using subfossil tree-ring samples from the Sixth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison and contemporary tree-ring samples from Shangdianzi. The 14C results showed that both the improved and the Jayme-Wise methods were effective for extracting α-cellulose from subfossil and modern tree-ring samples. The ABA-B method was sufficient only for subfossil wood, while unstable for the modern tree-ring samples when the heartwood-sapwood transition was presence. The Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy results indicated that the purity of α-cellulose extracted by the improved method was similar to that of pure α-cellulose. In comparison to the Jayme-Wise method, the improved method reduced the extraction time and the amount of organic solvent, while increased batch processing capacity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树轮放射性碳分析预处理提取方法的比较
合理的树轮预处理方法是保证14C数据可靠性的关键。本研究比较了三种树木年轮预处理方法:酸-碱-酸-漂白(ABA-B)、Jayme-Wise和本研究提出的改进方法。改进后的方法采用超声浴代替了Jayme-Wise法中的索氏提取。我们利用第六次国际放射性碳比对的亚化石树木年轮样本和上店子当代树木年轮样本对三种方法的14C结果进行了评估。14C实验结果表明,改进方法和Jayme-Wise方法均能有效地从亚化石和现代树木年轮样品中提取α-纤维素。ABA-B方法仅适用于亚化石木材,而对于存在心材-边材过渡的现代年轮样品则不稳定。傅里叶变换红外光谱结果表明,改进方法提取的α-纤维素纯度与纯α-纤维素相似。与Jayme-Wise法相比,改进后的方法减少了提取时间和有机溶剂的用量,同时提高了批量处理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Geology
Chemical Geology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Geology is an international journal that publishes original research papers on isotopic and elemental geochemistry, geochronology and cosmochemistry. The Journal focuses on chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary petrology, low- and high-temperature aqueous solutions, biogeochemistry, the environment and cosmochemistry. Papers that are field, experimentally, or computationally based are appropriate if they are of broad international interest. The Journal generally does not publish papers that are primarily of regional or local interest, or which are primarily focused on remediation and applied geochemistry. The Journal also welcomes innovative papers dealing with significant analytical advances that are of wide interest in the community and extend significantly beyond the scope of what would be included in the methods section of a standard research paper.
期刊最新文献
High-pressure experimental constraints of carbonates + pyrite ± water interactions: implications for coupled C-H-O-S cycling in subduction zones Contribution of Fe K-edge XANES spectroscopy to the characterization of Fe distribution in clay minerals. Application during experimental alteration of swelling clay minerals A central position for the South China Block in Rodinia: New evidence from a non-subduction origin of the 827 ± 22 Ma episode mafic–ultramafic rocks Exploring biogeochemical processes through untargeted screening of solvent-extracted molecular signatures HF(aq) thermodynamics in hydrothermal fluids and implications for metal transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1