Exploring artificial intelligence-powered virtual assistants to understand their potential to support older adults’ search needs

Emily M. Langston , Varitnan Hattakitjamroen , Mario Hernandez , Hye Soo Lee , Hannah Ç. Mason , Willencia Louis-Charles , Neil Charness , Sara J. Czaja , Wendy A. Rogers , Joseph Sharit , Walter R. Boot
{"title":"Exploring artificial intelligence-powered virtual assistants to understand their potential to support older adults’ search needs","authors":"Emily M. Langston ,&nbsp;Varitnan Hattakitjamroen ,&nbsp;Mario Hernandez ,&nbsp;Hye Soo Lee ,&nbsp;Hannah Ç. Mason ,&nbsp;Willencia Louis-Charles ,&nbsp;Neil Charness ,&nbsp;Sara J. Czaja ,&nbsp;Wendy A. Rogers ,&nbsp;Joseph Sharit ,&nbsp;Walter R. Boot","doi":"10.1016/j.hfh.2025.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We investigated the accuracy and amount of information provided by artificial intelligence (AI)-powered virtual assistants in response to queries relevant to aging adults in the domains of Medicare, long-term care insurance, and resource access.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Older adults are faced with complex decisions and must gather and integrate information from diverse sources to help support these decisions (e.g., across various websites and online resources). Information-seeking, integration, and decision-making are cognitively demanding and can be impacted by age-related cognitive changes. Virtual assistants powered by AI have the potential to provide older adults with easy access to information and answers to their queries. However, it is unclear how accurate this information and these answers might be.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Alexa, Google Assistant, Bard, and ChatGPT-4 were queried. Coders assessed the accuracy of these responses, and the amount of supplemental information provided as a measure of response complexity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, Large Language Model (LLM)-based virtual assistants (Bard, ChatGPT-4) responded more accurately than non-LLM assistants (e.g., 6 % inaccurate responses for Bard vs. 60 % for Alexa) and provided substantially more supplemental information (79 % of responses with high supplemental information for Bard and 37 % for Chat-GPT, vs. 20 % or less for others). We note, however, that responses can vary over time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on their ability to provide largely accurate responses, LLMs may be helpful tools for older adults seeking information related to health, insurance, and available resources. However, the potential for error, high response complexity, and response variability should be considered.</div></div><div><h3>Application</h3><div>LLM-based virtual assistants may be a helpful tool for older adults seeking information to support health and financial decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93564,"journal":{"name":"Human factors in healthcare","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human factors in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277250142500003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We investigated the accuracy and amount of information provided by artificial intelligence (AI)-powered virtual assistants in response to queries relevant to aging adults in the domains of Medicare, long-term care insurance, and resource access.

Background

Older adults are faced with complex decisions and must gather and integrate information from diverse sources to help support these decisions (e.g., across various websites and online resources). Information-seeking, integration, and decision-making are cognitively demanding and can be impacted by age-related cognitive changes. Virtual assistants powered by AI have the potential to provide older adults with easy access to information and answers to their queries. However, it is unclear how accurate this information and these answers might be.

Method

Alexa, Google Assistant, Bard, and ChatGPT-4 were queried. Coders assessed the accuracy of these responses, and the amount of supplemental information provided as a measure of response complexity.

Results

Overall, Large Language Model (LLM)-based virtual assistants (Bard, ChatGPT-4) responded more accurately than non-LLM assistants (e.g., 6 % inaccurate responses for Bard vs. 60 % for Alexa) and provided substantially more supplemental information (79 % of responses with high supplemental information for Bard and 37 % for Chat-GPT, vs. 20 % or less for others). We note, however, that responses can vary over time.

Conclusion

Based on their ability to provide largely accurate responses, LLMs may be helpful tools for older adults seeking information related to health, insurance, and available resources. However, the potential for error, high response complexity, and response variability should be considered.

Application

LLM-based virtual assistants may be a helpful tool for older adults seeking information to support health and financial decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human factors in healthcare
Human factors in healthcare Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
145 days
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of bed falls among inpatients in Iranian hospitals: A meta-analysis Exploring artificial intelligence-powered virtual assistants to understand their potential to support older adults’ search needs Engineered testbeds for investigating syringe injection performance in human factors studies Is your medical device “easy to use”? Supplemental oxygen patients’ experiences and tradeoffs around portable oxygen concentrators and tanks Team adaptive capacity and adaptation in dynamic environments: A scoping review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1