Jorge Armando Bedoya-Cadavid , Angela María Lanzas-Duque , Harold Salazar
{"title":"Common risk factors for Latin American electric utilities","authors":"Jorge Armando Bedoya-Cadavid , Angela María Lanzas-Duque , Harold Salazar","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Investment in electric power infrastructure is needed to ensure access to affordable, secure, and sustainable energy in Latin America by 2030. A determining factor to stimulate this type of investment is the rate of return approved by the regulatory commissions. The return expected by investors (cost of equity) depends on the risks associated with these investments. Regulatory commissions commonly use the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), for which only market risk is relevant. Market risk is low for regulated firms, ignoring other risk types, and is measured with firms and variables outside the Latin American region. This procedure, however, does not consider the risks these types of investments are exposed to in Latin America. In this analysis, six risk factors were initially proposed to explain the risk-return relationship of these types of investments; nevertheless, after an exploratory analysis of the factors, two factors were eliminated to form a four-factor model (Electric-4). Then, the CAPM model was contrasted with the Electric-4 model. Both models used Latin American firms and market variables, and both were evaluated between July 2010 and July 2022. The analysis sample comprises 28 electric utilities dedicated to transmission and distribution. Through regression analysis, we found that the Electric-4 model explains a higher percentage of the variations in the portfolio returns of electric utilities in the Latin American Integrated Market (MILA), São Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&F), and Buenos Aires Stock Exchange (BCBA). These results help to understand the risk-return relationship of electric power infrastructure investments in the Americas for investment decision-making. In addition, the proposed model aids the regulatory commissions in Latin America in establishing an adequate return on equity cost of capital that encourages investments in electric power infrastructure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101812"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872400105X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Investment in electric power infrastructure is needed to ensure access to affordable, secure, and sustainable energy in Latin America by 2030. A determining factor to stimulate this type of investment is the rate of return approved by the regulatory commissions. The return expected by investors (cost of equity) depends on the risks associated with these investments. Regulatory commissions commonly use the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), for which only market risk is relevant. Market risk is low for regulated firms, ignoring other risk types, and is measured with firms and variables outside the Latin American region. This procedure, however, does not consider the risks these types of investments are exposed to in Latin America. In this analysis, six risk factors were initially proposed to explain the risk-return relationship of these types of investments; nevertheless, after an exploratory analysis of the factors, two factors were eliminated to form a four-factor model (Electric-4). Then, the CAPM model was contrasted with the Electric-4 model. Both models used Latin American firms and market variables, and both were evaluated between July 2010 and July 2022. The analysis sample comprises 28 electric utilities dedicated to transmission and distribution. Through regression analysis, we found that the Electric-4 model explains a higher percentage of the variations in the portfolio returns of electric utilities in the Latin American Integrated Market (MILA), São Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&F), and Buenos Aires Stock Exchange (BCBA). These results help to understand the risk-return relationship of electric power infrastructure investments in the Americas for investment decision-making. In addition, the proposed model aids the regulatory commissions in Latin America in establishing an adequate return on equity cost of capital that encourages investments in electric power infrastructure.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.