Performance evaluation of lightweight pattern recognition algorithms for portable environmental monitoring electronic noses

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building and Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112446
Lei Wang , Fei Li , Chengwen Yang , Lihang Feng , Xiaodong Cao
{"title":"Performance evaluation of lightweight pattern recognition algorithms for portable environmental monitoring electronic noses","authors":"Lei Wang ,&nbsp;Fei Li ,&nbsp;Chengwen Yang ,&nbsp;Lihang Feng ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bionic electronic nose mimics the olfactory system of living organisms, enabling the detection and differentiation of odors or gas mixtures. With appropriate data processing and pattern recognition algorithms, it can be used in environmental quality analysis and process control. The existing electronic nose algorithms have problems such as data processing difficulties, model complexity and high computational cost. In this study, we investigated the performances of various pattern recognition algorithms for classifying and identifying different gases, especially the performances of the lightweight algorithms, based on publicly available dataset. First, the response signals from the sensor array were converted into response maps. Then, several pattern recognition algorithms, including HOG_SVM, VGG16, SqueezeNet, ShuffleNet v2, MobileNet v3, and GhostNet were used to identify the gas species in unmixed and mixed gas datasets. And the performances of the pattern recognition algorithms were evaluated. The results show that VGG16 achieves the highest accuracy, attaining a perfect 100% on the unmixed gas dataset and 95.14% on the mixed gas dataset. Among lightweight models, SqueezeNet demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 94.44% on the mixed gas dataset. Furthermore, SqueezeNet has the fewest parameters, totaling just 0.74 million. Meanwhile, MobileNet v3 is notable for its minimal computational cost, requiring only 0.059 billion Floating Point Operations Per Second (FLOPs). Deployment on an edge computing platform, such as the NVIDIA Jetson Xavier, enabled MobileNet v3 to achieve optimal performance in terms of inference latency and memory consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 112446"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324012873","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bionic electronic nose mimics the olfactory system of living organisms, enabling the detection and differentiation of odors or gas mixtures. With appropriate data processing and pattern recognition algorithms, it can be used in environmental quality analysis and process control. The existing electronic nose algorithms have problems such as data processing difficulties, model complexity and high computational cost. In this study, we investigated the performances of various pattern recognition algorithms for classifying and identifying different gases, especially the performances of the lightweight algorithms, based on publicly available dataset. First, the response signals from the sensor array were converted into response maps. Then, several pattern recognition algorithms, including HOG_SVM, VGG16, SqueezeNet, ShuffleNet v2, MobileNet v3, and GhostNet were used to identify the gas species in unmixed and mixed gas datasets. And the performances of the pattern recognition algorithms were evaluated. The results show that VGG16 achieves the highest accuracy, attaining a perfect 100% on the unmixed gas dataset and 95.14% on the mixed gas dataset. Among lightweight models, SqueezeNet demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 94.44% on the mixed gas dataset. Furthermore, SqueezeNet has the fewest parameters, totaling just 0.74 million. Meanwhile, MobileNet v3 is notable for its minimal computational cost, requiring only 0.059 billion Floating Point Operations Per Second (FLOPs). Deployment on an edge computing platform, such as the NVIDIA Jetson Xavier, enabled MobileNet v3 to achieve optimal performance in terms of inference latency and memory consumption.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
期刊最新文献
The nonlinear climatological impacts of urban morphology on extreme heats in urban functional zones: An interpretable ensemble learning-based approach Parametric analysis and experimental investigation on lighting quality in tunnel due to invalid luminaires Natural light control to improve awakening quality Innovative green roof technologies in Mediterranean climate: Implications for sustainable design of the built environment Adaptive model-based advanced natural ventilation control strategy for mixed-mode residential buildings in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1