Validation study of cross-ventilation in a realistic building geometry: RANS, SAS and LES

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building and Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112354
Mutmainnah Sudirman , Twan van Hooff , Stefanie Gillmeier , Bert Blocken
{"title":"Validation study of cross-ventilation in a realistic building geometry: RANS, SAS and LES","authors":"Mutmainnah Sudirman ,&nbsp;Twan van Hooff ,&nbsp;Stefanie Gillmeier ,&nbsp;Bert Blocken","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of natural cross-ventilation flow with wind tunnel (WT) measurements is important in view of accurate and reliable numerical simulations. A review of the literature indicates that the majority of previous CFD and WT measurement studies employed a simplified generic single-zone building with a prismatic shape. The objective of this study is the validation of isothermal CFD simulations of two different realistic building models resembling a pitched roof single-story house, both without (case 1) and with internal partition (case 2). The CFD simulations were conducted using the 3D steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach with the SST k-ω, RLZ k-ε and RNG k-ε turbulence models, scale-adaptive simulations (SAS) with the SST k-ω model, and large eddy simulations (LES) with the Smagorinsky-Lilly subgrid-scale model. The evaluation was performed in two parts: impact of turbulence model and impact of internal partition. The results show that LES and SAS exhibit a good agreement with WT results, outperforming RANS for the two cases. When considering only indoor streamwise mean velocity, for case 1, 97 % and 73 % of the sampled LES and SAS velocities fall with the uncertainty band of the WT measurements. For case 2, these values are 92 % and 75 % for LES and SAS, respectively. Steady RANS provides an agreement of only 56 % and 63 % for case 1 and case 2, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 112354"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013232401196X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of natural cross-ventilation flow with wind tunnel (WT) measurements is important in view of accurate and reliable numerical simulations. A review of the literature indicates that the majority of previous CFD and WT measurement studies employed a simplified generic single-zone building with a prismatic shape. The objective of this study is the validation of isothermal CFD simulations of two different realistic building models resembling a pitched roof single-story house, both without (case 1) and with internal partition (case 2). The CFD simulations were conducted using the 3D steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach with the SST k-ω, RLZ k-ε and RNG k-ε turbulence models, scale-adaptive simulations (SAS) with the SST k-ω model, and large eddy simulations (LES) with the Smagorinsky-Lilly subgrid-scale model. The evaluation was performed in two parts: impact of turbulence model and impact of internal partition. The results show that LES and SAS exhibit a good agreement with WT results, outperforming RANS for the two cases. When considering only indoor streamwise mean velocity, for case 1, 97 % and 73 % of the sampled LES and SAS velocities fall with the uncertainty band of the WT measurements. For case 2, these values are 92 % and 75 % for LES and SAS, respectively. Steady RANS provides an agreement of only 56 % and 63 % for case 1 and case 2, respectively.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实建筑几何结构中交叉通风的验证研究:RANS, SAS和LES
考虑到数值模拟的准确性和可靠性,利用风洞测量验证计算流体力学(CFD)模拟自然交叉通风流的有效性具有重要意义。对文献的回顾表明,以前的大多数CFD和WT测量研究采用了简化的具有棱柱形状的通用单区建筑。本研究的目的是验证两种类似斜屋顶单层房屋的真实建筑模型的等温CFD模拟,两种模型都没有(案例1)和有内部隔板(案例2)。CFD模拟采用三维稳态reynolds -平均Navier-Stokes (RANS)方法,采用SST k-ω, RLZ k-ε和RNG k-ε湍流模型,尺度自适应模拟(SAS)采用SST k-ω模型,使用Smagorinsky-Lilly亚网格尺度模型进行大涡模拟(LES)。评估分为两部分:湍流模型的影响和内部隔板的影响。结果表明,在两种情况下,LES和SAS与WT结果表现出良好的一致性,优于RANS。当只考虑室内流向平均速度时,在例1中,97%和73%的采样LES和SAS速度落在WT测量的不确定带内。对于情况2,LES和SAS的这些值分别为92%和75%。对于情形1和情形2,稳定RANS分别提供了56%和63%的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
期刊最新文献
A calculation model for particulate matter concentration on subway platform based on 2D dimensionality reduction and equivalent emission rates Multi-indicator performance prediction in residential buildings: A multimodal fusion method based on cross-attention Urban areas have higher heat exposure, but rural areas face greater exposure inequality Electroencephalography-based assessment of pressure comfort in high-speed train cabins: From neural mechanisms to explainable evaluation model Analysis and optimization of air distribution and anti-condensation performance for high-speed train in severe cold regions using attached airflow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1