{"title":"Anaesthesia for endovascular aneurysm repair","authors":"Simon Hatton, Sian Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) can be done via an open or endovascular approach; surgical and patient factors determine which is most appropriate. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is usually done in specialist centres with a multidisciplinary team involving surgeons, interventional radiologists and anaesthetists. Benefits of this approach include reduced physiological insult, shorter hospital stays and more favourable early mortality but it also requires lifelong follow-up, and mortality in the mid to long term is no better than open repair (OR). As a result, there was initial hesitancy by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to recommend EVAR in elective AAA repair but this was revised and can now be considered where open repair is contraindicated. Indeed, the majority of elective AAA repair is done endovascularly. Patients undergoing EVAR are usually more comorbid and frailer than OR patients and so comprehensive preoperative assessment and optimization is paramount. The often-remote location of, and associated radiation exposure in hybrid theatres can present additional challenges to the anaesthetist. General, regional or local anaesthesia can be employed, each with associated benefits and disadvantages. Intraoperative management can vary depending on patient, anaesthetic and surgical factors. Specific considerations include providing a balance between the potential for significant blood loss whilst also requiring a level of anticoagulation, the physiological changes around stent deployment and facilitating optimal imaging. Postoperatively complications are usually minimal but patients require lifelong follow-up, making it a more intrusive and expensive option compared to OR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45856,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472029924002418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) can be done via an open or endovascular approach; surgical and patient factors determine which is most appropriate. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is usually done in specialist centres with a multidisciplinary team involving surgeons, interventional radiologists and anaesthetists. Benefits of this approach include reduced physiological insult, shorter hospital stays and more favourable early mortality but it also requires lifelong follow-up, and mortality in the mid to long term is no better than open repair (OR). As a result, there was initial hesitancy by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to recommend EVAR in elective AAA repair but this was revised and can now be considered where open repair is contraindicated. Indeed, the majority of elective AAA repair is done endovascularly. Patients undergoing EVAR are usually more comorbid and frailer than OR patients and so comprehensive preoperative assessment and optimization is paramount. The often-remote location of, and associated radiation exposure in hybrid theatres can present additional challenges to the anaesthetist. General, regional or local anaesthesia can be employed, each with associated benefits and disadvantages. Intraoperative management can vary depending on patient, anaesthetic and surgical factors. Specific considerations include providing a balance between the potential for significant blood loss whilst also requiring a level of anticoagulation, the physiological changes around stent deployment and facilitating optimal imaging. Postoperatively complications are usually minimal but patients require lifelong follow-up, making it a more intrusive and expensive option compared to OR.
期刊介绍:
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, an invaluable source of up-to-date information, with the curriculum of both the Primary and Final FRCA examinations covered over a three-year cycle. Published monthly this ever-updating text book will be an invaluable source for both trainee and experienced anaesthetists. The enthusiastic editorial board, under the guidance of two eminent and experienced series editors, ensures Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine covers all the key topics in a comprehensive and authoritative manner. Articles now include learning objectives and eash issue features MCQs, facilitating self-directed learning and enabling readers at all levels to test their knowledge. Each issue is divided between basic scientific and clinical sections. The basic science articles include anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics and clinical measurement, while the clinical sections cover anaesthetic agents and techniques, assessment and perioperative management. Further sections cover audit, trials, statistics, ethical and legal medicine, and the management of acute and chronic pain.