Nexus of sustainability and organizational resilience: The role of operational slack

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103167
Fangxu Yan , Fu Jia , Lujie Chen , Asif Nazrul
{"title":"Nexus of sustainability and organizational resilience: The role of operational slack","authors":"Fangxu Yan ,&nbsp;Fu Jia ,&nbsp;Lujie Chen ,&nbsp;Asif Nazrul","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The outbreak of COVID-19 provides a unique opportunity to examine new challenges for organizational resilience. This study empirically investigates the relationship between a firm's sustainability performance (in the form of an environmental, social, and governance [ESG] score) and its organizational resilience while considering the moderating effects of operational slack. To address these issues, we collected 1167 cross-sectional data points with samples in manufacturing firms from the China Stock Market &amp; Accounting Research and the Wind Financial Terminal databases in the year 2020, when the manufacturing industry is severely hit by COVID. Using the ordinary least squares and Cox survival methods to conduct regression analyses, our results reveal that a firm's ESG performance has positive impacts on its resilience in the form of stability and flexibility. We also find that three types of operational slack (production capacity, labor productivity, and inventory slack) positively moderate the relationship between ESG performance and stability. Additionally, production capability slack and labor slack positively moderate the relationship between ESG performance and flexibility. By doing so, we contribute to the emergent stream of research on the nexus of sustainability and resilience in the context of a global pandemic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 103167"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224002177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 provides a unique opportunity to examine new challenges for organizational resilience. This study empirically investigates the relationship between a firm's sustainability performance (in the form of an environmental, social, and governance [ESG] score) and its organizational resilience while considering the moderating effects of operational slack. To address these issues, we collected 1167 cross-sectional data points with samples in manufacturing firms from the China Stock Market & Accounting Research and the Wind Financial Terminal databases in the year 2020, when the manufacturing industry is severely hit by COVID. Using the ordinary least squares and Cox survival methods to conduct regression analyses, our results reveal that a firm's ESG performance has positive impacts on its resilience in the form of stability and flexibility. We also find that three types of operational slack (production capacity, labor productivity, and inventory slack) positively moderate the relationship between ESG performance and stability. Additionally, production capability slack and labor slack positively moderate the relationship between ESG performance and flexibility. By doing so, we contribute to the emergent stream of research on the nexus of sustainability and resilience in the context of a global pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
In pursuit of the third mission: Exploring women's participation in academic engagement activities in sub-Saharan Africa Across disciplines, to make an impact. The technological impact of boundary-spanning research projects Strategic NFT adoption to combat digital piracy From new venture idea to viable business: Breakthrough innovation capability in established firms Drivers for the emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge areas: An actor-level perspective on building legitimacy for the case of synthetic life sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1