{"title":"Approaching Indigenous theoretical frameworks and quantitative research methods to improve Indigenous data","authors":"Jameson D. Lopez, Ruth Cuasialpud-Canchala","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper reflects on the challenges faced by researchers in utilizing institutional and national datasets to study Indigenous educational outcomes, proposing a transformative approach through Indigenous theoretical frameworks and quantitative research methods. The intention of the following is to provide quasi-completed and proposed studies within Indigenous communities to illustrate the needs and principles we need to take while collecting data in Indigenous populations. We present three examples examining 1. How researchers might integrate an Indigenous theoretical framework, Quechan warrior tradition (Kwanamii), with critical quantitative methods to measure postsecondary outcomes. 2. The collaboration of Native American non-profits to create some of the best data on Native American college students to date. And 3. to addresses the need for critical quantitative approaches in international contexts, using the example of Colombia and the <em>SABER 11</em> test dataset, to highlight the importance of disaggregated data for meaningful analysis. We conclude with a call to develop culturally responsive research informed by Indigenous knowledge, aiming to catalyze transformative change in educational systems and practices for the benefit of Indigenous communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper reflects on the challenges faced by researchers in utilizing institutional and national datasets to study Indigenous educational outcomes, proposing a transformative approach through Indigenous theoretical frameworks and quantitative research methods. The intention of the following is to provide quasi-completed and proposed studies within Indigenous communities to illustrate the needs and principles we need to take while collecting data in Indigenous populations. We present three examples examining 1. How researchers might integrate an Indigenous theoretical framework, Quechan warrior tradition (Kwanamii), with critical quantitative methods to measure postsecondary outcomes. 2. The collaboration of Native American non-profits to create some of the best data on Native American college students to date. And 3. to addresses the need for critical quantitative approaches in international contexts, using the example of Colombia and the SABER 11 test dataset, to highlight the importance of disaggregated data for meaningful analysis. We conclude with a call to develop culturally responsive research informed by Indigenous knowledge, aiming to catalyze transformative change in educational systems and practices for the benefit of Indigenous communities.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.