{"title":"Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with cytology and human papillomavirus co-testing: A 12-year retrospective study in Oyama district, Japan","authors":"Hiroyuki Fujiwara , Yuji Takei , Yasushi Saga , Seung Chik Jwa , Akiyo Taneichi , Takahiro Koyanagi , Yoshifumi Takahashi , Suzuyo Takahashi , Kohei Tamura , Miki Shinohara , Mitsuaki Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2025.102762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) co-testing in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted in Oyama district, Japan, where cytology and HPV co-testing has been implemented since 2012. Data for 2012–2020 were retrospectively analyzed; results were compared with those of cytology-alone screening conducted from 2009 to 2011. Screening outcomes, including referral rate and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2, CIN3/adenocarcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma detection rates, were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Co-testing and cytology-alone screening were performed in 62,155 and 34,040 individuals, respectively; the corresponding referral rates were 4.1 % and 1.9 %. Co-testing resulted in significantly higher referral rates but decreasing trends over time (4.6 %, 4.0 %, and 3.8 % in 2012–2014, 2015–2017, and 2018–2020, respectively). The CIN2 detection rate, which was 0.2 % during the era of cytology alone, significantly increased to 0.49 % during 2012–2014 after the introduction of co-testing and remained higher at 0.31 % during 2015–2017 and 0.37 % during 2018–2020. In contrast, the CIN3 + detection rate increased from 0.13 % during the era of cytology alone to 0.19 % during 2012–2014 but significantly decreased to 0.14 % and 0.06 % during 2015–2017 and 2018–2020, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our long-term data and comparison with historical controls indicate that co-testing resulted in a higher CIN2 detection rate, potentially reducing CIN3 + community incidence. Although referral rate initially increased with co-testing, a decreasing trend was noted over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102762"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782125000219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) co-testing in Japan.
Methods
The study was conducted in Oyama district, Japan, where cytology and HPV co-testing has been implemented since 2012. Data for 2012–2020 were retrospectively analyzed; results were compared with those of cytology-alone screening conducted from 2009 to 2011. Screening outcomes, including referral rate and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2, CIN3/adenocarcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma detection rates, were assessed.
Results
Co-testing and cytology-alone screening were performed in 62,155 and 34,040 individuals, respectively; the corresponding referral rates were 4.1 % and 1.9 %. Co-testing resulted in significantly higher referral rates but decreasing trends over time (4.6 %, 4.0 %, and 3.8 % in 2012–2014, 2015–2017, and 2018–2020, respectively). The CIN2 detection rate, which was 0.2 % during the era of cytology alone, significantly increased to 0.49 % during 2012–2014 after the introduction of co-testing and remained higher at 0.31 % during 2015–2017 and 0.37 % during 2018–2020. In contrast, the CIN3 + detection rate increased from 0.13 % during the era of cytology alone to 0.19 % during 2012–2014 but significantly decreased to 0.14 % and 0.06 % during 2015–2017 and 2018–2020, respectively.
Conclusion
Our long-term data and comparison with historical controls indicate that co-testing resulted in a higher CIN2 detection rate, potentially reducing CIN3 + community incidence. Although referral rate initially increased with co-testing, a decreasing trend was noted over time.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including:
• Descriptive epidemiology
• Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis
• Screening and early detection
• Prevention and control
• Methodological issues
The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.