Digital communication and tie formation amongst freshmen students during and after the pandemic

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Social Networks Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2024.12.002
Judith Gilsbach , Johannes Stauder
{"title":"Digital communication and tie formation amongst freshmen students during and after the pandemic","authors":"Judith Gilsbach ,&nbsp;Johannes Stauder","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the network evolution among sociology freshmen students during and after the Covid-19 pandemic as a natural experiment on the impacts of digitalised communication. The first surveyed cohort (N = 42) began their studies under lockdown in October 2020, when all classes were taught online (lockdown cohort). The second cohort (N = 66) started one year later when the lockdown measures were released partly and most classes were taught in a hybrid mode (hybrid cohort). We use Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models (SAOM) for model estimation; missing relations due to actor non-response are multiply imputed using SAOM-based procedures. The findings show (1) that the network among students of the lockdown cohort developed slower and reached a lower density at the end of the first term, (2) that the probability of triadic closure was significantly lower in the lockdown than in the hybrid cohort and (3) that in both cohorts, students have a stronger tendency to get acquainted if they share classes, but (4) that shared classes were more important for tie formation during lockdown. We conclude that digital communication will mitigate the opportunities to make new acquaintances and friends.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"81 ","pages":"Pages 53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the network evolution among sociology freshmen students during and after the Covid-19 pandemic as a natural experiment on the impacts of digitalised communication. The first surveyed cohort (N = 42) began their studies under lockdown in October 2020, when all classes were taught online (lockdown cohort). The second cohort (N = 66) started one year later when the lockdown measures were released partly and most classes were taught in a hybrid mode (hybrid cohort). We use Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models (SAOM) for model estimation; missing relations due to actor non-response are multiply imputed using SAOM-based procedures. The findings show (1) that the network among students of the lockdown cohort developed slower and reached a lower density at the end of the first term, (2) that the probability of triadic closure was significantly lower in the lockdown than in the hybrid cohort and (3) that in both cohorts, students have a stronger tendency to get acquainted if they share classes, but (4) that shared classes were more important for tie formation during lockdown. We conclude that digital communication will mitigate the opportunities to make new acquaintances and friends.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
期刊最新文献
Digital communication and tie formation amongst freshmen students during and after the pandemic Corrigendum to “Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures” [Soc. Netw. 29 (2007) 300–315] Revising the Borgatti-Everett core-periphery model: Inter-categorical density blocks and partially connected cores Estimating policy effects in a social network with independent set sampling Why distinctiveness centrality is distinctive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1