Has corporate greed driven inflation in the European Union? An analysis of the food and beverage industry

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics Letters Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112164
Maximilian Koppenberg , Stefan Wimmer , Stefan Hirsch
{"title":"Has corporate greed driven inflation in the European Union? An analysis of the food and beverage industry","authors":"Maximilian Koppenberg ,&nbsp;Stefan Wimmer ,&nbsp;Stefan Hirsch","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The EU has recently experienced high inflation rates, particularly in food prices. This observation led to claims in the news and by retailers that large food and beverage manufacturers take advantage of high inflation, and increase prices more than necessary (“greedflation”) to compensate for increases in their raw material prices. To test whether this claim is true, we estimate a production function to determine markups of output price over marginal costs for a sample of 88,717 European food and beverage manufactures covering the years 2013–2022. Our results do not support the greedflation hypothesis as markups have decreased over the considered period. In addition, there is a negative correlation between raw material prices and markups which is stronger for large firms, suggesting that these firms cannot be generally accused of taking advantage of high inflation. Our results imply that claimed “greedflation” does not justify additional pro-competitive policies in the food and beverage manufacturing sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 112164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525000011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The EU has recently experienced high inflation rates, particularly in food prices. This observation led to claims in the news and by retailers that large food and beverage manufacturers take advantage of high inflation, and increase prices more than necessary (“greedflation”) to compensate for increases in their raw material prices. To test whether this claim is true, we estimate a production function to determine markups of output price over marginal costs for a sample of 88,717 European food and beverage manufactures covering the years 2013–2022. Our results do not support the greedflation hypothesis as markups have decreased over the considered period. In addition, there is a negative correlation between raw material prices and markups which is stronger for large firms, suggesting that these firms cannot be generally accused of taking advantage of high inflation. Our results imply that claimed “greedflation” does not justify additional pro-competitive policies in the food and beverage manufacturing sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业贪婪是否推动了欧盟的通胀?对食品和饮料行业的分析
欧盟最近经历了高通货膨胀率,尤其是食品价格。这一观察结果导致新闻和零售商声称,大型食品和饮料制造商利用高通胀,将价格提高到不必要的水平(“贪婪通胀”),以补偿原材料价格的上涨。为了检验这种说法是否正确,我们估计了一个生产函数,以确定2013-2022年88,717家欧洲食品和饮料制造商的产出价格高于边际成本的加价。我们的结果不支持贪婪通货膨胀假说,因为加价在考虑的时期有所下降。此外,原材料价格和加价之间存在负相关关系,大公司的负相关关系更强,这表明这些公司通常不能被指责利用高通胀。我们的研究结果表明,所谓的“贪婪通胀”并不能证明在食品和饮料制造业采取额外的有利于竞争的政策是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
期刊最新文献
Why strong regulators move slowly: A global paradox in central bank digital currency adoption Editorial Board European booms and busts over six centuries A copula-quantile density approach to affiliated private value auctions A tree-based mixture model for heterogeneous mediation analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1