Transforming education with AI: A systematic review of ChatGPT's role in learning, academic practices, and institutional adoption

IF 7.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Results in Engineering Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103837
Sayeed Salih , Omayma Husain , Mosab Hamdan , Samah Abdelsalam , Hashim Elshafie , Abdelwahed Motwakel
{"title":"Transforming education with AI: A systematic review of ChatGPT's role in learning, academic practices, and institutional adoption","authors":"Sayeed Salih ,&nbsp;Omayma Husain ,&nbsp;Mosab Hamdan ,&nbsp;Samah Abdelsalam ,&nbsp;Hashim Elshafie ,&nbsp;Abdelwahed Motwakel","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of AI tools like ChatGPT into education has generated significant interest due to their potential to transform learning environments by providing personalized learning, automating tasks, and improving student engagement. However, gaps remain in the literature, particularly in comparing AI-supported education methods with traditional approaches and understanding ChatGPT's specific role in academic writing, literature reviews, and teacher development. This study addresses these gaps through a systematic literature review (SLR), evaluating the effectiveness of AI tools versus traditional teaching approaches. It focuses on ChatGPT's application in areas such as academic writing, lesson planning, student assessment, and the professional development of educators. Additionally, the study explores institutional strategies for balancing the benefits of AI with the need to maintain academic integrity and educational quality. The methodology involved a systematic search across academic databases with a structured analysis of key studies in AI-supported education. The main contributions include identifying the comparative advantages and limitations of AI in enhancing student learning, offering best practices for incorporating AI tools into teaching, and examining prompt engineering as a crucial factor in optimizing AI usage. The study reveals that ChatGPT and other AI tools significantly enhance educational efficiency and engagement, but they require careful management to prevent over-reliance. The study advocates for a balanced approach, integrating both AI and traditional methods to achieve optimal educational outcomes while maintaining academic integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 103837"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024020802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of AI tools like ChatGPT into education has generated significant interest due to their potential to transform learning environments by providing personalized learning, automating tasks, and improving student engagement. However, gaps remain in the literature, particularly in comparing AI-supported education methods with traditional approaches and understanding ChatGPT's specific role in academic writing, literature reviews, and teacher development. This study addresses these gaps through a systematic literature review (SLR), evaluating the effectiveness of AI tools versus traditional teaching approaches. It focuses on ChatGPT's application in areas such as academic writing, lesson planning, student assessment, and the professional development of educators. Additionally, the study explores institutional strategies for balancing the benefits of AI with the need to maintain academic integrity and educational quality. The methodology involved a systematic search across academic databases with a structured analysis of key studies in AI-supported education. The main contributions include identifying the comparative advantages and limitations of AI in enhancing student learning, offering best practices for incorporating AI tools into teaching, and examining prompt engineering as a crucial factor in optimizing AI usage. The study reveals that ChatGPT and other AI tools significantly enhance educational efficiency and engagement, but they require careful management to prevent over-reliance. The study advocates for a balanced approach, integrating both AI and traditional methods to achieve optimal educational outcomes while maintaining academic integrity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用人工智能改变教育:对ChatGPT在学习、学术实践和机构采用中的作用的系统回顾
像ChatGPT这样的人工智能工具与教育的整合引起了人们的极大兴趣,因为它们有可能通过提供个性化学习、自动化任务和提高学生参与度来改变学习环境。然而,文献中仍然存在差距,特别是在比较人工智能支持的教育方法与传统方法以及理解ChatGPT在学术写作、文献综述和教师发展中的具体作用方面。本研究通过系统文献综述(SLR)来解决这些差距,评估人工智能工具与传统教学方法的有效性。它侧重于ChatGPT在学术写作、课程规划、学生评估和教育工作者专业发展等领域的应用。此外,该研究还探讨了平衡人工智能的好处与保持学术诚信和教育质量的需要的制度战略。该方法包括在学术数据库中进行系统搜索,并对人工智能支持教育的关键研究进行结构化分析。主要贡献包括确定人工智能在增强学生学习方面的比较优势和局限性,提供将人工智能工具纳入教学的最佳实践,以及将即时工程作为优化人工智能使用的关键因素进行研究。研究表明,ChatGPT和其他人工智能工具显著提高了教育效率和参与度,但它们需要仔细管理,以防止过度依赖。该研究倡导一种平衡的方法,将人工智能和传统方法结合起来,在保持学术诚信的同时实现最佳的教育成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Hybrid CNN-Transformer models for industrial defect detection: A systematic review Recent advances in MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems: A review of classical (P&O, IC), intelligent (ANN), optimization (PSO) and hybrid (ANN-PSO) methods Bio-binders in sustainable asphalt technologies: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis Review of thermal comfort, health risks, and environmental control strategies in small- and medium-scale indoor swimming venues Electrochemical remediation of polychlorinated biphenyls: Critical review of status, challenges and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1